Long-term Success Rate of Transvaginal Mesh for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Extended RCT Study

July 9, 2023 updated by: Lan Zhu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
The original RCT trial is designed to compare self-tailored titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with mesh-kit in the treatment of POP stage III-IV in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effective at 1-year follow-up. This study will follow women in the original RCT study for up to 10 years from the time of the surgery to compare success and complication rates in the two groups. Recruitment into this study is open only to women that already participated in previous RCT, no new treatment interventions will be given. Recruitment into the previous RCT is closed. Women will be strongly encouraged to participate in annual examinations and annual telephone surveys but may participate in only one of these study parts if needed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The previous study is a randomized trial designed to compare the composite success rate between patients with self-cut mesh procedure and those with mesh-kit procedure. The original RCT study includes a 1-year follow up from the time of surgery, which is too short to evaluate the long-term sequelae of the surgical procedures. The goal of this long-term follow-up study is to extend the follow-up of women in the previous RCT study up to 10 years from the time of surgery and to compare the success and complication rates of the two surgical treatment groups over this extended time period.

The primary aim is to determine whether treatment success in women who undergo the above strategies differ at time points through 10 years. A supplemental study investigates the long-term success rate and complications of transvaginal mesh procedure in women in both of the study arms.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

336

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Juan Chen
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Foshan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Yuling Wang
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College
        • Contact:
          • Xiaowei Zhang
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Changsha Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Binan Wang
      • Changsha, Hunan, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Secong Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
        • Contact:
          • Guangshi Tao
    • Jiangsu
      • Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
        • Recruiting
        • Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jian Gong
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:
          • Peishu Liu
    • Shanxi
      • Xi'an, Shanxi, China
        • Recruiting
        • Shanxi Provincial People's Hosptial
        • Contact:
          • Xiangyang Jiang
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ping Wang
    • Xiangjiang
      • Ürümqi, Xiangjiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hosptial of Xinjiang Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Gulina Ababaikeli
    • Xinjiang
      • Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • The People's hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
        • Contact:
          • Hatiguli Nisier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All women enrolled in previous RCT study are invited to this extended study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women enrolled in previous RCT study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent. Informed consent will be obtained prior to each telephone interview and each in-person visit.
  • Subjects who appear to have cognitive deficits during the in-person visit or site telephone interview will be withdrawn from the study by the study coordinator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
self-cut mesh procedure
This procedure is transvaginal mesh implantation surgery for POP patients. Self-cut mesh procedure is an economic pelvic reconstructive surgical operation with use of specially designed puncture needles and self-cut mesh, which mainly provide anterior and apical compartments support, with posterior compartment reinforced by bridge technique repair. The mesh pieces used in this surgery was cut from a single piece of mesh material(TiLOOP 10*15cm) which is much cheaper and readily available. Patients could have transvaginal hysterectomy concomitantly.
transvaginal mesh procedure using self-cut mesh
mesh-kit procedure
This procedure is transvaginal mesh implantation surgery for POP patients.Mesh-kit procedure is refered to pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with titanium-coated meshes kit(TiLOOP TOTAL6).Patients could have transvaginal hysterectomy concomitantly.
transvaginal mesh procedure using mesh-kit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite success
Time Frame: up to 10 years after procedure
To determine the long-term (up to 10 years) composite success rate of both procedure (defined as leading edge above the hymen (i.e Ba, C, Bp<0 cm) AND deny vaginal bulging symptoms indicated by a negative response question 3 of the pelvic floor distress inventory- 20 (PFDI-20): "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area? AND no re-operation or pessary treatment for POP), and whether composite success rate differs between women who had self-cut mesh procedure vs. those who had mesh-kit procedure; This outcome measure is cumulative across the original RCT trial and continued through the extended trial follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)
up to 10 years after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
anatomic outcomes
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
Anatomic failure was defined as POPQ system leading edge at or beyond the hymen (i.e Ba, C, Bp≥0 cm). This outcome measure is cumulative across the original RCT trial and continued through the extended follow-up study with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)
up to 10 years after operation
Change From Baseline PFIQ-7 Score
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year [up to 10 years] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.
up to 10 years after operation
Change From Baseline PFDI-20 Score
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of responses for the CRADI is: 0-400 with 0 (least distress) to 400 (most distress). Change = (Year [up to 10 years] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.
up to 10 years after operation
Change From Baseline PISQ-12 Score
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, (PISQ-12) is a questionnaire measuring the impact of POP symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The PISQ-12 Score ranges from 0 to 48 with higher scores indicating better function/satisfaction. Change = (Year [up to 10 years] Score - Baseline Score). Higher scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.
up to 10 years after operation
Symptomatic improvement using patient global impression of change (PGI-C)
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) is a patient-reported measure of perceived change with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).
up to 10 years after operation
Complications
Time Frame: up to 10 years after operation
Using IUGA/ICS Joint Terminology CTS coding system and Clavien-Dindo classification
up to 10 years after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 12, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 12, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • extended TVM

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe