USG-Guided Infiltration Popliteal Artery Capsule Knee Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Application as Postoperative Analgesia

July 13, 2023 updated by: asım erçelik, Siirt Training and Research Hospital

Comparison Between USG-Guided Infiltration Popliteal Artery Capsule Knee Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Application as Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Prosthesis Under General Anesthesia: Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of USG-guided adductor canal block and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block combination on postoperative analgesia before total knee arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the present study, the purpose was to evaluate the effect of Ultrasound(USG)-guided adductor canal block(ACB) and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block(IPACK) combination on postoperative analgesia before total knee arthroplasty(TKA). A total of 40 patients,who were aged 18-75 with the American Society of Anesthesiologists score(ASA) I-III physical status,and who were scheduled for TKA under general anesthesia,were included in the present study.ACB and IPACK were performed in group A(ACB+IPACK) accompanied by USG, Bupivacaine and 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride were applied in each block application.No block was applied to the patients in group B.Patient-controlled analgesia was administered to both groups 30 minutes before the end of the surgery.Tramadol HCL was infused at a concentration of 4mg/ml.A bolus of 20 mg of tramadol hydrochloride was given with a lock-in interval of 30 minutes.Postoperative systolic arterial pressure(SAP),diastolic arterial pressure(DAP),mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),visual analog scale(VAS),analgesic consumption,nausea,vomiting, and patient satisfaction scores were recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bolu, Turkey, 14030
        • Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 18-75 years
  • who were scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty in Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Training and Research Hospital Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hypersensitivity to the drugs to be used in the study or the substances in their composition
  • pregnant women
  • severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal disease
  • a history of chronic opioid use and chronic pain syndrome
  • patients who were not suitable for regional anesthesia (bleeding diathesis, infection in the procedure area), and those who could not apply patient controlled anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: adductor canal block and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block
Adductor canal block and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block were performed accompanied by USG, Bupivacaine and 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl were applied in each block application.
ACB and IPACK were performed in USG-guided adductor canal block and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block accompanied by USG, Bupivacaine and 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl were applied in each block application.
No block was applied to the patients in control
Sham Comparator: Control
No block performed
ACB and IPACK were performed in USG-guided adductor canal block and infiltration popliteal artery capsule knee block accompanied by USG, Bupivacaine and 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl were applied in each block application.
No block was applied to the patients in control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
tramadol consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
tramadol consumption amounts were 0-1 hours, 1-12 hours, 12-24 hours
24 hours
using morphine as rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
rescue analgesia was evaluated for 0-1 hour, 1-12 hours, and 12-24, the number of patients who used morphine
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kutay Engin Özturan, Professor, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
  • Study Chair: Cengiz Işık, Professor, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
  • Study Chair: Asım İlker İtal, MD, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
  • Study Chair: Mustafa Türkoğlu, MD, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This study is a thesis that I did and presented two years ago. The raw data has not been backed up after going through statistical analysis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe