Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Acute Sinusitis (NOSES)

February 27, 2026 updated by: Daniel Merenstein
Sinus infections (also called acute rhinosinusitis or ARS) affect about 15% of adults each year, and are one of the top reasons people receive antibiotics in outpatient settings. Since most sinus infections are caused by viruses, many patients who take antibiotics for this condition do not actually benefit. Even though this has decreased over recent years, 70% of people are still prescribed them after a visit for ARS. Our goal is to better understand which patients truly benefit from antibiotics and which other treatment options can help people with sinus infections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One in seven adults are diagnosed with acute sinus infections (also known as rhinosinusitis or ARS) every year in the United States, for an annual total of 30 million office visits. The majority of physician-diagnosed, acute sinus infections in outpatient setting are caused by viral infection, but antibiotics are prescribed in over 70% of these visits--without significant benefits to patients compared to placebo. Most ARS cases resolve without antibiotics; however, some patients do benefit from antibiotics. Previous research suggests that individuals with an elevated c-reactive protein level, double-sickening (worsening of sinus symptoms after initial improvement), or evidence of purulence on clinical examination, are more likely to respond to antibiotic treatment. The overarching goal of this study is to improve outcomes for patients with ARS by better understanding which groups of patients are most likely to benefit from antibiotics, supportive care, watchful waiting, intranasal corticosteroids (INCS), or a combination of treatments.

To assess the comparative effectiveness of the treatments, a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial, will be conducted in primary and urgent care clinics within six geographical areas. This trial will enroll adults 18-75 years of age who present to a clinician with symptoms consistent with ARS. Patients participating in this study will enter one of two phases. Phase 1 is a pre-randomization, waiting period of 9 or more days, with options for supportive care. Participants who do not improve by the end of 9 days, had symptoms for more than 9 days at enrollment, or have experienced double-sickening, will proceed to Phase 2 and be randomly assigned to one of the four intervention arms. Sixty percent of the 3,720 enrolled are estimated to participate in Phase 2, resulting in a sample size of 1,860 randomized after attrition. During Phase 1 (up to 9 days) and Phase 2 (14 days), all participants complete a two-minute daily diary and periodic follow-ups about their symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3720

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Derjung Mimi Tarn, MD, PhD
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Recruiting
        • Georgetown University Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Merenstein, MD
    • Maryland
      • Hyattsville, Maryland, United States, 20782
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Medstar Health Research Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nawar Shara, PhD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Recruiting
        • Penn State College of Medicine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Rabago, MD
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23219
        • Recruiting
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexander Krist, MD, MPH
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sebastian Tong, MD, MPH
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • Recruiting
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruce Barrett, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-75 years old; AND are experiencing either:
  2. "persistent" symptoms or signs compatible with ARS or sinus infection lasting for 1-21 days without any evidence of clinical improvement (Symptoms include facial pain or pressure, facial congestion or fullness, nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, no or reduced sense of smell, fever ≤39°C or 102°F, headache, bad smelling breath, fatigue, ear pain or pressure, and dental pain); OR
  3. onset with worsening symptoms or signs characterized by the new onset of fever, headache, or increase in nasal discharge following a typical viral upper respiratory infection (URI) that lasted 5-6 days and were initially improving (''double-sickening'').

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy or intolerance to penicillin
  • received systemic antibiotic therapy in the past 4 weeks
  • prior sinus surgery (cosmetic surgery, such as rhinoplasty, septal deviation, etc. are not exclusionary)
  • complications of sinusitis (facial edema (swelling), cellulitis), or orbital, meningeal or cerebral signs)
  • health care clinician determined IV (intravenous) antibiotics or hospital admission are required
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • presence of a comorbidity or medication that may impair a patient's immune response as determined by a health care clinician
  • hospitalization in past 5 days
  • unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or comply with study protocol requirements
  • fever >39°C or 102°F today
  • taking intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) regularly in the past two weeks and unwilling to stop its use while in the study; OR
  • previously enrolled or participated in the feasibility phase or this stage of study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: antibiotic
amoxicillin/clavulanate
Amoxicillin/clavulanate, oral, 875mg/125mg twice daily for 7 days
Other Names:
  • Augmentin
Active Comparator: antibiotic plus intranasal corticosteroid
amoxicillin/clavulanate plus budesonide
Budesonide nasal spray, 32 mcg per spray, 2 sprays per nostril, once per day
Other Names:
  • Rhinocort
Amoxicillin/clavulanate, oral, 875mg/125mg twice daily for 7 days
Other Names:
  • Augmentin
Other: placebo antibiotic plus intranasal corticosteroid
placebo antibiotic plus budesonide
Budesonide nasal spray, 32 mcg per spray, 2 sprays per nostril, once per day
Other Names:
  • Rhinocort
Placebo for amoxicillin/clavulanate, oral, twice daily for 7 days
Other Names:
  • Control
  • Inactive
Placebo Comparator: placebo antibiotic
placebo antibiotic (for amoxicillin/clavulanate)
Placebo for amoxicillin/clavulanate, oral, twice daily for 7 days
Other Names:
  • Control
  • Inactive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Improvement
Time Frame: Change from Day 1 to Day 3 in Phase 2; differences in longitudinal trends across groups during Phase 2
Improvement of symptoms will be assessed using the Modified Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (mSNOT-16), a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. Sixteen sinus symptoms are self-assessed on a 0-3 point scale, with 0=No Problem, 1=Mild or Slight Problem, 2=Moderate Problem, 3=Severe Problem. The mean of the total score is used to assess symptom severity. Daily measures will be collected both in Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Change from Day 1 to Day 3 in Phase 2; differences in longitudinal trends across groups during Phase 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent improved beyond minimal clinically important difference
Time Frame: Phase 1: Baseline to Day 9; Phase 2: Day 1 to Day 3
Percent of patients who improved more than 0.5; improvement of symptoms will be assessed using the Modified Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (mSNOT-16), a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. Sixteen sinus symptoms are self-assessed on a 0-3 point scale, with 0=No Problem, 1=Mild or Slight Problem, 2=Moderate Problem, 3=Severe Problem.
Phase 1: Baseline to Day 9; Phase 2: Day 1 to Day 3
Patient non-randomization rate
Time Frame: Phase 1: baseline to Day 9
Percentage of patients who were enrolled in Phase 1 but did not proceed to randomization because they reported their condition had improved. This is determined by the patient at the Day 9 assessment, by decreased mSNOT-16 scores from baseline, or no longer reports symptoms listed in the inclusion criteria.
Phase 1: baseline to Day 9
Supportive care
Time Frame: Phase 1: Baseline to Day 9; Phase 1: Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14
Types and frequency of supportive care used.
Phase 1: Baseline to Day 9; Phase 1: Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
Time Frame: Phase 1: Baseline, Day 9 day; Phase 2: Days 1, 7, and 14
Work and activity impairment due to acute sinusitis; the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem 2.0 is a 6-question self-reported questionnaire on the effects of sinus symptoms on the amount of absenteeism (percent work time missed), presenteeism (percent impairment while working), overall work impairment, and daily activity impairment. Higher percentages indicate greater impairment and less productivity (scale 0-100%).
Phase 1: Baseline, Day 9 day; Phase 2: Days 1, 7, and 14
Global Rating of Improvement as Quality of Life
Time Frame: Phase 1: Baseline, Day 9; Phase 2: Days 1, 7, and 14
Self-assessment of current sinus symptoms at each follow-up interview using a 6-point categorical scale (1=no symptoms, 2=a lot better, 3=a little better, 4=the same, 5=a little worse, or 6=a lot worse).
Phase 1: Baseline, Day 9; Phase 2: Days 1, 7, and 14
Symptomatic care
Time Frame: Phase 1: daily; Phase 2: daily
Use patterns of over-the-counter medicines or supplements.
Phase 1: daily; Phase 2: daily
Adverse events
Time Frame: Phase 1: daily; Phase 2: daily
Adverse events reported during a follow-up or on the diary. Events are graded form 1-5 using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Phase 1: daily; Phase 2: daily
Adherence
Time Frame: Phase 2: Days 1-7
Self-reported adherence to study pill and nasal spray are calculated by [number of doses taken]/[prescribed number of doses] x 100, over the 7-day intervention period.
Phase 2: Days 1-7
Prevalence of double-sickening
Time Frame: Direct randomization to Phase 2
Worsening of symptoms after an initial improvement.
Direct randomization to Phase 2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Saline nasal irrigation - Concentration
Time Frame: Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
Number who used 0.9 or 2% saline concentration
Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
Saline nasal irrigation - Frequency
Time Frame: Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
Number who used SNI 1, 2 or 3 times per day
Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
Saline nasal irrigation - Timing
Time Frame: Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
Number who used SNI before 12 pm or after 12 pm
Phase 1: daily; Phase 2; daily
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Phase 1 and Phase 2
Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) level as a predictor of bacterial infection, of not improving in Phase 1 and proceeding to Phase 2, and of poorer outcomes in non-antibiotic groups
Phase 1 and Phase 2
Clinician's Estimation of the Likelihood of Bacterial Infection and/or Benefit From Antibiotics
Time Frame: Enrollment day
Number of clinicians who responded low, intermediate, or high probability
Enrollment day
Seasonal/Geographical Fluctuations in Symptom Severity
Time Frame: Enrollment day
Difference in baseline mSNOT-16s score across sites and seasons
Enrollment day
Change in mSNOT-16 scores from symptom start day to 14 days post-randomization
Time Frame: Symptom start day to 14 days post-randomization
Longitudinal differences between daily mSNOT-16 scores from symptom start day, baseline and and visit days: Day 1-9 before randomization to Days 1-14 post-randomization. A decrease in mSNOT-16 score would indicate an improvement in symptoms.
Symptom start day to 14 days post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Infection

Clinical Trials on Budesonide nasal spray

Subscribe