Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony Detection With a Machine Learning Algorithm

Automated Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony With a Machine Learning Algorithm

This is a diagnostic study aiming to compare accuracy to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies by a machine learning algorithm, compared to the gold-standard defined as dyssynchronies diagnosed and classified by mechanical ventilator and esophageal pressure waveforms analyzed by experts.

The main question of this study is:

• Are patient-ventilator dyssynchronies accurately detected and classified by an artificial intelligence algorithm when compared to experts analyzing esophageal pressure and mechanical ventilator waveforms?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a diagnostic, observational study, aiming to assess patient-ventilator dyssynchrony automated detection and classification by a machine learning algorithm. Accuracy of the machine learning algorithm will be compared with the gold-standard, defined as dyssynchronies detected and classified by mechanical ventilation experts.

Experts will analyzed airway pressure, flow, volume and esophageal pressure waveforms to detect and classify dyssynchronies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403900
        • Recruiting
        • Heart Institute, University of São Paulo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult subjects under mechanical ventilation, with an assisted or assist-controlled mode, who are monitored with an esophageal pressure balloon due to clinical indication are eligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects under assisted or assist-controlled mechanical ventilation and monitored with esophageal pressure balloon.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal from patient's family or attending physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchronies
This is a single arm study, since all subjects included will be exposed to both diagnostic methods (artificial intelligence and experts). The proposed diagnostic method is a machine learning algorithm integrated in the mechanical ventilator FlexiMag Max 700 (Magnamed, Brazil), which will continuously record data from mechanical ventilation of included subjects for a time period of up to 72 hours. The gold-standard involves esophageal pressure waveform recording and offline analysis by experts.
Machine learning algorithm to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies, which is integrated in the mechanical ventilator (Fleximag Max, Magnamed, Brazil).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence algorithm
Time Frame: 3 days
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the artificial intelligence algorithm to detect and classify patient-ventilator dyssynchronies. These accuracy indexes will be estimated for each kind of dyssinchrony: ineffective effort, autotriggering, double triggering, reverse triggering, reverse triggering with a double cycle
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pendelluft detection
Time Frame: 3 days
Percentage of cycles with pendelluft detected with the artificial intelligence algorithm compared to the percentage of cycles with pendelluft detected with the esophageal pressure
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eduardo LV Costa, MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 24, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchronies

Subscribe