Impact of Nasal High-flow vs Venturi Mask Oxygen Therapy on Weaning Outcome: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (RINO)

July 18, 2017 updated by: Salvatore Maurizio MAGGIORE, MD, PhD, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
The purpose of this study is to determine whether, as compared with the Venturi mask, a nasal, high-flow oxygenation device (Optiflow) may reduce the extubation failure rate in patients needing oxygen therapy after extubation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study compares the effects of two devices for oxygen therapy, the nasal, high-flow (Optiflow, intervention) and the Venturi mask (control), on the outcome of extubation. Available data suggest that Optiflow can improve oxygenation and patient's comfort in critically ill patients after extubation. The study hypothesis is that Optiflow may reduce the extubation failure rate in these patients.

In the intervention group, patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and not presenting any of the exclusion criteria will receive high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., New Zealand) after extubation. The oxygen concentration (FiO2) will be set to reach an oxygenation target similar to control patients (see below), while the gas flow rate will be set at 50 L/min.

In the control group, patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and not presenting any of the exclusion criteria will receive oxygen through a standard Venturi mask after extubation. The FiO2 will be set to obtain a arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) between 92% and 98% (or between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients). Further FiO2 modifications will be performed by the attending physicians to meet the oxygenation target.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France
        • Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital
      • Montpellier, France
        • Lapeyronie University Hospital
      • Montpellier, France
        • Saint Eloi University Hospital
      • Paris, France
        • La Pitie-Salpetriere University Hospital
      • Paris, France
        • Louis Mourier University Hospital
      • Paris, France
        • Saint-Louis University Hospital
      • Poitiers, France
        • University Hospital
      • Athens, Greece
        • Evangelismos University Hospital
      • Bari, Italy
        • Policlinico University Hospital
      • Novara, Italy
        • Università del Piemonte Orientale, Ospedale della Carità
      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital
      • Turin, Italy
        • Le Molinette University Hospital
      • Vercelli, Italy
        • Università del Piemonte Orientale, Sant'Andrea Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Sant Pau University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Mechanical ventilation > 24 hours
  3. Signed Informed Consent
  4. Successful spontaneous breathing trial
  5. PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 (or SpO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 if SpO2 is lower than 98%) within 30 min after extubation while breathing through a Venturi mask with a delivered FiO2 of 31%

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Presence of tracheostomy
  3. Need for immediate post-extubation Non-Invasive Ventilation (>3 consecutive failures of the spontaneous breathing trial and/or a PaCO2 > 45 mmHg before the spontaneous breathing trial, with a respiratory rate ≥ 25/min)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nasal high-flow oxygen therapy
High-flow, fully humidified oxygen delivered through nasal cannula (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare) after extubation up to ICU discharge
This device delivers high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula
Active Comparator: Venturi mask oxygen therapy
Oxygen delivered through standard Venturi mask after extubation up to ICU discharge
This device delivers low-flow oxygen at predetermined concentrations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reintubation
Time Frame: within 72 hours after extubation or at ICU discharge
within 72 hours after extubation or at ICU discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Need for Non-Invasive Ventilation
Time Frame: at day 28 after inclusion in the study or at ICU discharge
at day 28 after inclusion in the study or at ICU discharge
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: at day 28 from the inclusion in the study or at ICU discharge
at day 28 from the inclusion in the study or at ICU discharge
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: at day 28 from the inclusion in the study or at hospital discharge
at day 28 from the inclusion in the study or at hospital discharge
ICU readmission
Time Frame: at day 28 from inclusion in the study
at day 28 from inclusion in the study
ICU mortality
Time Frame: at day 28 from inclusion in the study
at day 28 from inclusion in the study
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: at day 28 from inclusion in the study
at day 28 from inclusion in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, MD, PhD, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weaning Failure

Clinical Trials on Optiflow (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare)

3
Subscribe