Telehealth Intervention for Ostomy Self-Management

March 3, 2026 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

Perioperative Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth Intervention for Cancer Survivors

Over one million individuals in the U.S. have ostomies. An ostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal wall that allows bodily waste (urinary or fecal) to pass through into an external pouch; in essence, it is the externalization of the gastrointestinal or urinary structures to the abdominal wall. For cancer, ostomies are most commonly placed for rectal cancers, followed by urinary bladder cancer. The health-related quality of life impact of an ostomy is tremendous and greater than many other cancer treatments. The goal of this study is to pilot-test a perioperative ostomy self-management telehealth intervention (Periop-OSMT) in patients with colorectal and bladder cancer and their family caregivers. Participants will receive seven group telehealth sessions before and after ostomy surgery. This pilot clinical trial will study the feasibility of the methods/interventions and determine the preliminary efficacy to support a larger confirmatory trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An ostomy is a disability that adversely affects the HRQOL of cancer survivors and their support persons/family caregivers (FCGs) at all phases of cancer survivorship. More than half of survivors experience stoma-related challenges such as pain, troublesome odor, skin problems around the stoma, and leakage. Ongoing problems include pouching care, travel out of the home (especially relevant for rural populations), social interactions, intimacy, and acceptance of/satisfaction with appearance. Studies document persistent challenges including sexuality, psychological problems, and interference with work, and recreation and sporting activities. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of a perioperative ostomy self-management telehealth intervention (Periop-OSMT) and to determine the preliminary efficacy of the intervention on participant-reported outcomes, compared to the usual care arm. We hypothesize that the intervention will be feasible, acceptable and will demonstrate preliminary improvements in outcomes compared to the usual care arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Virginia Sun, PhD, RN
  • Phone Number: 626-218-3122
  • Email: vsun@coh.org

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • Recruiting
        • City of Hope Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Virginia Sun, PhD, RN
          • Phone Number: 626-359-8111
          • Email: vsun@coh.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient Eligibility Criteria:

  • Patient with bladder or colorectal cancer
  • Scheduled to undergo a surgical procedure that includes the creation of an intestinal stoma (fecal or urinary, permanent or temporary)
  • For bladder cancer, only patients with incontinent urostomies (ileal conduit) are eligible.
  • Age: ≥ 18 years
  • Ability to read and understand English for Questionnaires

Family Caregiver Eligibility Criteria:

  • A family member or friend identified by the patient and defined as a person who knows the patient well and is involved in the patient's care before and after surgery
  • Age: ≥ 18 years
  • Ability to read and understand English for Questionnaires
  • Pregnant FCGs are eligible for participation. Participation in this behavioral/educational intervention should not impact the pregnancy/fetus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Periop-OSMT Telehealth Intervention Arm
Arm 1 includes the following key components: 1) assignment to a peer ostomate; 2) ostomy self-management skills building delivered through group telehealth sessions and led by trained ostomy nurses and peer ostomates; 3) intervention resource manual. The intervention is delivered through 2 telephone and 5 telehealth sessions over a 16 week period.
This includes the following key components: 1) assignment to a peer ostomate; 2) ostomy self-management skills building delivered through group telehealth sessions and led by trained ostomy nurses and peer ostomates; 3) intervention resource manual.
Other: Standard of Care Arm
Arm 2 involves standard of care, where patients and family caregivers are managed by the oncology care team. Care may include clinic visits for follow-up, cancer directed treatments, referrals to other medical specialties as needed, and institutional ostomy nurse support before and after surgery as needed.
standard of care, where patients and family caregivers are managed by the oncology care team. Care may include clinic visits for follow-up, cancer directed treatments, referrals to other medical specialties as needed, and institutional ostomy nurse support before and after surgery as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy for Ostomy Self-Management
Time Frame: At 13 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the Self-Efficacy to Perform Self-management Behaviors Scale, an outcome measure for Chronic Disease Management Interventions, this scale represents 8 domains: physical activity, information seeking, support, communication with HC providers, ostomy management, social and recreational, symptom management, and depression. Higher scores reflect better self-efficacy. Study arm differences at 13 weeks will be assessed via repeated measures linear regression models with adjustment for baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors including cancer type (bladder versus colorectal) and whether the patient has a caregiver.
At 13 weeks post-randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the Intervention
Time Frame: at baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks post randomization
Will be measured by a) at least 60% of eligible participants enrolled, b) at least 60% of participants completing at least ≥80% of the intervention (at least one of sessions 1-2 and all of sessions 3-6), c) at least 60% of participants that complete any follow-up assessments after randomization, and d) exploring participant experience with the intervention through structured exit interviews).
at baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks post randomization
Patient Activation
Time Frame: At 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). The measure assessed four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. Higher scores reflect higher activation. Study arm differences at 13 weeks and 26 weeks will be assessed via repeated measures linear regression models with adjustment for baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors including cancer type (bladder versus colorectal) and whether the patient has a caregiver.
At 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Patient and Family Caregiver Psychological Distress
Time Frame: At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the Distress Thermometer. The tool evaluates psychological distress over the past week, based on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extremely distressed). A cut-off of 3/10 indicates a need for intervention. Study arm differences at 13 weeks and 26 weeks will be assessed via repeated measures linear regression models with adjustment for baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors including cancer type (bladder versus colorectal) and whether the patient has a caregiver.
At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Quality of Life
Time Frame: At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the City of Hope-Quality of Life-Colorectal Cancer (COH-QOL-CRC). Evaluates overall HRQOL and four dimensions: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being. Higher score reflect better quality of life. Study arm differences at 13 weeks and 26 weeks will be assessed via repeated measures linear regression models with adjustment for baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors including cancer type (bladder versus colorectal) and whether the patient has a caregiver.
At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Family Caregiver Quality of Life
Time Frame: At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the City of Hope-Quality of Life-Family (COH-QOL-Family) tool. Measures the FCG QOL in the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being domains. Ordinal scale ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating better QOL. Study arm differences at 13 weeks and 26 weeks will be assessed via repeated measures linear regression models with adjustment for baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors including cancer type (bladder versus colorectal) and whether the patient has a caregiver.
At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Colostomy Impact
Time Frame: At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization
Will be measured by the Colostomy Impact Score and used in patients with colorectal cancer only. Identifies patients with stoma dysfunction that impairs HRQOL by dividing patients into 'minor' and 'major' CI groups.
At Baseline, 13 and 26 weeks post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Virginia Sun, PhD, RN, City of Hope Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 4, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 4, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer

  • University of California, San Francisco
    Completed
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Terminated
    Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Cancer Survivor | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Recruiting
    Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas...
    United States Department of Defense
    Active, not recruiting
    Colorectal Adenoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Completed
    Cancer Survivor | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • Emory University
    Bristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of...
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Metastatic | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Refractory Colorectal Carcinoma | Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Carcinoma | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer
    United States
  • University of Roma La Sapienza
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Stage II | Colorectal Cancer Stage III | Colorectal Cancer Stage IV | Colorectal Cancer Stage 0 | Colorectal Cancer Stage I
    Italy
  • Wuhan Union Hospital, China
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Metastatic | Colorectal Cancer Screening | Colorectal Cancer Recurrent | Colorectal Cancer Control and Prevention
    China

Clinical Trials on Telehealth Intervention

Subscribe