Analgesia From Conscious Sedation Versus Paracervical Block for Manual Vacuum Aspiration

August 2, 2024 updated by: Darlington-Peter Chibuzor Ugoji

Analgesia From Conscious Sedation Versus Paracervical Block for Manual Vacuum Aspiration for First Trimester Incomplete Miscarriage in Abakaliki: A Randomized Trial

Miscarriage is one of the major causes of early pregnancy losses. Incomplete miscarriage is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Analgesia from both conscious sedation and paracervical could be utilized during manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester incomplete miscarriage. The objectives of this study are to review the existing studies and to compare analgesia from conscious sedation with that of paracervical block among women selected for manual vacuum aspiration following first trimester incomplete miscarriages in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki [AEFUTHA].

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

SUMMARY

Background:

First trimester pregnancy losses are estimated to occur in 14-19% of all clinically confirmed pregnancies and account for about 80% of all the pregnancy losses. Miscarriage is one of the major causes of early pregnancy losses. Incomplete miscarriage is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.

Analgesia from both conscious sedation and paracervical could be utilized during manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester incomplete miscarriage. In my center, conscious sedation is mostly used but because of the pronounced systemic side effect of drowsiness, weakness etc, there is a shift to paracervical block hence this study.

Objectives:

The objectives of this study are to review the existing studies and to compare analgesia from conscious sedation with that of paracervical block among women selected for manual vacuum aspiration following first trimester incomplete miscarriages in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki [AEFUTHA].

Methodology:

This was a randomized control trial equivalent study that compared the analgesia from conscious sedation with that of the paracervical block in women selected for manual vacuum aspiration following first trimester incomplete miscarriage in AEFUTHA. Patients were categorized into groups: A and B. Those in group A received conscious sedation using intravenous diazepam 10 mg and intravenous pentazocine 30 mg stat while those in the other group B received paracervical block via the use of 10ml of 1% lidocaine with 4ml at 4:00 clock and 8:00 clock respectively and 2ml at the anterior lip of the cervix. After analgesic effect has occurred, manual vacuum aspiration was done and there after pain assessment was be carried out at 10 mins, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours respectively. The vital signs and oxygen saturation pre and post operatively were monitored with chart kept for analysis.

Analysis:

The data were analyzed using Spss, version 28.0 (2022). Continuous variables were compared with t- test while categorical variables were compared with Chi- square and the p-value determined. P- value less than 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ebonyi
      • Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria, 480101
        • AEFUTHA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Between the ages of 18- 45 years.
  • Spontaneous incomplete miscarriage at less than 13 weeks.
  • Not allergic to drugs for the study
  • Patients that give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients who do not consent to MVA [ Manual vacuum aspiration].
  • Those with known allergy history to the drug agents.
  • Those with septic incomplete miscarriage.
  • Patients with infection at the cervical blocking sites.
  • Those with active pelvic inflammatory disease.
  • Patients with neurological or psychiatric disease.
  • Incomplete miscarriage at greater than 13 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GROUP A (Conscious Sedation)
30mg of pentazocine was given intravenously, over one minute and a latency period of about 2 minutes was allowed before starting the procedure for analgesic function to take effect.
The Paracervical Block with lidocaine for manual vacuum aspiration
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
Experimental: GROUP B (The Paracervical Block)
Received 10 ml of 1% lidocaine, for the blocks with 4ml at 4 O' clock and 8 O'clock positions and 2 ml at the anterior cervical lip.
The Paracervical Block with lidocaine for manual vacuum aspiration
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean pain score using the Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: Pain and side effects experienced following the use of the analgesic agents at about 10 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours following the procedure was noted. Higher score showed more pain and lower score showed lower pain
The primary outcome measure is the mean pain score of the participants in the study groups.
Pain and side effects experienced following the use of the analgesic agents at about 10 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours following the procedure was noted. Higher score showed more pain and lower score showed lower pain

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: DARLINTON-PETER CHIBUZOR C UGOJI, MBBS, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This will only be after full defense of the work at the college

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Effect of Drug

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Subscribe