Evaluating a Water Quality Assurance Fund Intervention in Ghana and Kenya

August 22, 2024 updated by: The Aquaya Institute
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel financial and capacity strengthening intervention (the 'Water Quality Assurance Fund' program) on water safety management in rural Ghana and Kenya. The investigators hypothesize the intervention will improve water system operator knowledge, chlorination practices, and water quality at the point of collection, as well as improve consumer satisfaction, awareness, and willingness-to-pay for water that is tested and treated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regular water quality monitoring by water suppliers is essential for maintaining adequate treatment processes and verifying safe water quality to protect public health. Yet, many small water suppliers are unable to conduct regular water quality tests due to financial, logistical, and capacity constraints. The goals of the Water Quality Assurance Fund program are to address these constraints by incentivizing established laboratories to extend their services to these smaller water systems and, in parallel, promote the use of water quality data for better water safety management.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel financial and capacity strengthening intervention (the 'Water Quality Assurance Fund' program) on water safety management in rural Ghana and Kenya. As part of the intervention, written legal agreements between water systems, centralized laboratories, and the organization facilitating the Assurance Fund will provide water systems with regular water quality testing and provide laboratories a guarantee of payments if water systems fail to pay for testing services on time. The Assurance Fund program will also deliver capacity strengthening, technical guidance, and community sensitization activities.

The investigators hypothesize the intervention will improve water system operator knowledge, chlorination practices, and water quality at the point of collection, as well as improve consumer satisfaction, awareness, and willingness-to-pay for water that is tested and treated. A secondary aim is to assess implementation challenges and enabling factors associated with the expansion of water testing services by existing professional water quality laboratories to rural water suppliers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Accra, Ghana
        • Recruiting
        • The Aquaya Institute
        • Contact:
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Recruiting
        • The Aquaya Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Eligibility to receive the intervention was determined by water system criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The district or county government was interested in participating in the Assurance Fund program and water systems within the district/county were accessible to a partner central laboratory that was able to provide water sample collection and testing services for a fee.
  • Water systems were functional.
  • Water systems were piped water systems (Kenya, Ghana) or mechanized boreholes with a single tapstand (Ghana).
  • Water systems could afford regular water quality testing from the selected laboratory.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Water systems did not meet above inclusion criteria.

To be eligible to participate in household surveys, participants need to be at least 18 years of age and a customer of a eligible water system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Assurance Fund Intervention Arm 1
In this study arm, intervention activities will start after initial baseline data collection.
  • At the water system level: Written legal agreements between water systems, centralized laboratories, and the organization facilitating the Assurance Fund will provide water systems with regular water quality testing and provide laboratories a guarantee of payments if water systems fail to pay for testing services on time (for up to three concurrent unpaid invoices). Regular debrief meetings will be held with water operators and local government authorities to discuss test results and water treatment options, and to encourage water systems to share water quality information with their consumers. Technical guidance to improve water treatment will be provided, if requested by water system operators or local government authorities.
  • At the community level: Community engagement, primarily at the onset, to inform the community about the water quality testing program and answer questions.
Experimental: Assurance Fund Intervention Arm 2
The intervention activities are the same as those described in Arm 1. However, in this study arm, the intervention activities will start 6 months later than those in Arm 1. This arm will serve as a controlled comparison during those initial 6 months.
  • At the water system level: Written legal agreements between water systems, centralized laboratories, and the organization facilitating the Assurance Fund will provide water systems with regular water quality testing and provide laboratories a guarantee of payments if water systems fail to pay for testing services on time (for up to three concurrent unpaid invoices). Regular debrief meetings will be held with water operators and local government authorities to discuss test results and water treatment options, and to encourage water systems to share water quality information with their consumers. Technical guidance to improve water treatment will be provided, if requested by water system operators or local government authorities.
  • At the community level: Community engagement, primarily at the onset, to inform the community about the water quality testing program and answer questions.
Experimental: Assurance Fund Intervention Arm 3
The intervention activities are the same as those described in Arm 1. However, in this study arm, the intervention activities will start 12 months later than those in Arm 1. This arm will serve as a controlled comparison during those initial 12 months.
  • At the water system level: Written legal agreements between water systems, centralized laboratories, and the organization facilitating the Assurance Fund will provide water systems with regular water quality testing and provide laboratories a guarantee of payments if water systems fail to pay for testing services on time (for up to three concurrent unpaid invoices). Regular debrief meetings will be held with water operators and local government authorities to discuss test results and water treatment options, and to encourage water systems to share water quality information with their consumers. Technical guidance to improve water treatment will be provided, if requested by water system operators or local government authorities.
  • At the community level: Community engagement, primarily at the onset, to inform the community about the water quality testing program and answer questions.
Experimental: Non-randomized Arm
In Ghana only, there is a fourth study arm that will receive the intervention one month prior to Arm 1. This group was non-randomly selected and will primarily serve to support qualitative lessons learned from the Assurance Fund program.
  • At the water system level: Written legal agreements between water systems, centralized laboratories, and the organization facilitating the Assurance Fund will provide water systems with regular water quality testing and provide laboratories a guarantee of payments if water systems fail to pay for testing services on time (for up to three concurrent unpaid invoices). Regular debrief meetings will be held with water operators and local government authorities to discuss test results and water treatment options, and to encourage water systems to share water quality information with their consumers. Technical guidance to improve water treatment will be provided, if requested by water system operators or local government authorities.
  • At the community level: Community engagement, primarily at the onset, to inform the community about the water quality testing program and answer questions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequate free chlorine residual in water at the point of collection
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Free chlorine residual in water at the point of collection above targeted levels of 0.2 mg/L.
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detectable free chlorine residual in water at the point of collection
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Free chlorine residual in water at the point of collection above detectable levels of 0.1 mg/L.
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
E. coli in water at the point of collection
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
E. coli in water at point of collection (binary and categorical).
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Water system operator knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Water system operator knowledge related to water quality (score out of 32 points on a knowledge assessment).
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Consumer awareness
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Household respondent is aware enrolled water is tested or treated
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Consumer satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Household respondent is satisfied with water supplier. They will be considered satisfied if they report they are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the water supplier. They will be considered dissatisfied if they report they are either very dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied with the water supplier.
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Willingness-to-pay
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Stated willingness-to-pay for treated and tested water for standpipe and private tap users (% increase and absolute increase in local currency).
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Adequate free chlorine residual in household stored water
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Free chlorine residual in household stored water above targeted levels of 0.2 mg/L.
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Detectable free chlorine residual in household stored water
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Free chlorine residual in household stored water above detectable levels of 0.1 mg/L.
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
E. coli in household stored water
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
E. coli in household stored water (binary and categorical).
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Water system chlorination frequency
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Water system operator reports weekly chlorinating frequency.
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Water system revenue
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Revenue reported by water systems.
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months
Households use of enrolled water for drinking
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-months, 24-months
Households use of enrolled water for drinking (binary).
Baseline, 12-months, 24-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REAL-Water Assurance Fund

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be made available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Water Quality Assurance Fund

Subscribe