Comparative Effectiveness of Prescribed Adapted Physical Activity (APA), Either Practiced Independently After Training, or Supervised by an APA Teacher, on Glycemic Regulation in People With Unbalanced Type 2 Diabetes. (ACTIDIAB)

Comparative Effectiveness on Glycemic Balance of a Non-pharmacological Treatment, Adapted Physical Activity (APA), Either Supervised by a Qualified APA Instructor or Unsupervised in Autonomy, in Individuals With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes, Under Diet Alone or Non-insulin Treatment.

Comparative effectiveness on glycemic balance of a non-pharmacological treatment, Adapted Physical Activity (APA), either supervised by a qualified APA instructor or unsupervised in autonomy, in individuals with inadequately controlled Type 2 Diabetes, under diet alone or non-insulin treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Évry, France, 91058
        • CERITD (Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches pour l'Intensification du Traitement du Diabète),

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has given consent to participate in the study and has signed an informed consent form.
  • Patient aged 18 to 67 years
  • Patient diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
  • Patient newly diagnosed or on non-insulin treatment (metformin +/- DPP4 inhibitor, GLP1 analogue +/- SGLT2 inhibitor) for whom it is considered to initiate or intensify antidiabetic treatment by introducing a new therapeutic class.
  • Patient insufficiently controlled (> 1.30 g/L fasting blood glucose measured in the laboratory twice a few days apart in a city laboratory)
  • Patient with good venous access.
  • Patient capable of engaging in regular physical activity
  • Patient who has undergone a coronary artery disease screening test in the year prior to inclusion according to the new recommendations of an expert consensus.
  • Patient agrees to wear a FitBit Charge 6 bracelet for the entire duration of the study, including the run-in period, and agrees to recharge it and transmit the data.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosed with type 1 diabetes
  • Patient treated with sulfonylureas
  • Patient with a history of severe cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or stroke in the past year)
  • Patient presenting a medical contraindication to performing a physical activity session (uncontrolled resting hypertension, i.e., systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg, unstable coronary artery disease, heart failure, severe proliferative or non-proliferative evolving retinopathy (unstabilized), or having undergone recent surgical laser treatment of the eye, plantar perforating ulcer, disabling osteoarthritis of the lower limbs, respiratory failure, severe renal impairment, liver failure, severe dysautonomia, i.e., risk of chronotropic insufficiency during exercise, peripheral neuropathy)
  • Patient with a history of severe hypoglycemia in the 6 months prior to entering the study and/or not feeling their hypoglycemia at all
  • Patient with an IPAQ score in the high category
  • Patient with a known latex allergy
  • Patient with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m²)
  • Other conditions that may interfere with glycemic variation: particularly the use of corticosteroids during the study
  • Patient treated with beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers with negative chronotropic action (such as isoptin)
  • Breastfeeding woman
  • Pregnant woman* or wishing to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control
after initial APA training, patients will be asked to implement APA sessions on their own for the duration of the study. They will then be asked to return to the investigating center for a visit at 3 months (Visit 3) to assess the effect of the APA carried out during this period.
Experimental: experimental

after initial APA training, patients will receive regular support from an APA teacher, and will be asked to carry out 3 APA sessions a week, if possible in a Sport-Santé centre close to their home, for the duration of the study. The content of additional APA sessions (up to 2 additional sessions per week) can be discussed with the APA teacher.

They will also be asked to return to the investigating center for a visit at 3 months (Visit 3) to assess the effect of the APA carried out during this period.

After the initial training in adapted physical activity (APA), patients will receive regular support from an APA instructor, and they will be asked to participate in 3 sessions per week of APA, if possible in a Sport-Health center close to their home, for the entire duration of the study. The content of the additional APA sessions (up to 2 additional sessions per week) can be discussed with the APA instructor. They will also be asked to return to the study center for a visit at 3 months (Visit 3) to assess the effect of the APA conducted during this period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month re-training program, by comparing glycemic averages (measured for 10 consecutive days at 3 months, by a continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM) between experimental group (APA) vs control group.
Time Frame: 10 days after 3-month re-training program
Measurement of glucose by CGM
10 days after 3-month re-training program

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on adapted physical activity

Subscribe