Precision Ablation For Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Targeting Pulmonary Vein Myocardial Sleeves (PVMS) With Omnipolar Mapping Technology (PVS-PVI)

January 26, 2026 updated by: Ramesh Hariharan, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Precision Ablation For Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Targeting Pulmonary Vein Myocardial Sleeves With Omnipolar Mapping Technology - A Randomized Pilot Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare procedural times and Radiofrequency (RF)applications required for Pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves targeted pulmonary vein ablation (PVS-PVI) , to compare the efficacy of PVS-PVI , to compare the safety of PVS-PVI and to assess other clinical outcomes of PVS-PVI in individuals with symptomatic paroxysmal Atrial fibrillation (AF) using Omnipolar Technology with conventional Wide area circumferential ablation (WACA).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic paroxysmal AF refractory to at least one Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic medication, intolerance to antiarrhythmic medications, or a preference to not trial antiarrhythmic medications
  • A minimum of one documented AF episode via 12-lead ECG, Holter monitor, or loop recorder
  • Capability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent or permanent AF
  • Prior history of catheter or surgical ablation for AF or left atrial ablation for atypical flutter
  • Reversible causes of AF
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Significant valve disease (moderate or severe mitral/aortic stenosis or regurgitation)
  • Pregnancy
  • Known presence of intracardiac thrombus
  • Systemic oral anticoagulation therapy contraindicated, including a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  • Broad vortex-like connections and no clear PVMS to be targeted

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PVS-PVI

Omnipolar technology will be used to analyze all PVs and delineate the PVMS. Once identified, PVMS will be marked and described in a clockface fashion using a lateral view of the vein.Ablation will target the PVMS using the same power and force parameters as described for the WACA procedure. Effective ablation lesions and distance between ablation spots will be represented in the same manner too. Lesions should cover at least 5 mm outside the PVMS delineation on both PVMS borders of each myocardial sleeve. PVI will be demonstrated with the same technique described in the WACA procedure.

The PVI will be verified for each vein 10 minutes after the initial achievement of PVI.

Active Comparator: WACA
After generating the 3D electroanatomical map of the heart to understand where treatment needs to be applied,using a tool called radiofrequency (RF) ablation, small burns will be made around the veins to block abnormal electrical signals. Each burn is applied with up to 50 watts of power and lasts up to 10 seconds.The ablation tool will press down with a force of around 10-20 grams.The mapping system (NAVX software) shows the burns on the 3D map

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of minutes taken from Initial puncture to transseptal access
Time Frame: From time of Initial puncture to time of transseptal access (an average of 10 minutes)
From time of Initial puncture to time of transseptal access (an average of 10 minutes)
Number of minutes taken from transseptal access to left atrium 3D map completion
Time Frame: From time of transseptal access to time of left atrium 3D map completion (an average of 15 minutes)
From time of transseptal access to time of left atrium 3D map completion (an average of 15 minutes)
Number of minutes taken from left atrium 3D map completion to when all pulmonary veins are isolated
Time Frame: From time of left atrium 3D map completion to time when all pulmonary veins are isolated (an average of 30-60 minutes)
From time of left atrium 3D map completion to time when all pulmonary veins are isolated (an average of 30-60 minutes)
Number of minutes with catheters in the left atrium
Time Frame: from time catheters are inserted to time catheters are removed (an average of 45-80 minutes)
from time catheters are inserted to time catheters are removed (an average of 45-80 minutes)
Time from initial puncture till all sheaths removed
Time Frame: From time of initial puncture to time when all sheaths removed (an average of 90 minutes)
From time of initial puncture to time when all sheaths removed (an average of 90 minutes)
Total time of radiofrequency applications in seconds
Time Frame: from start of radiofrequency application to end of radiofrequency applications(an average of 300-900 seconds)
from start of radiofrequency application to end of radiofrequency applications(an average of 300-900 seconds)
Number of radiofrequency applications used
Time Frame: end of procedure (an average of 1.5 hours after baseline)
end of procedure (an average of 1.5 hours after baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Day and time to first recurrence of any documented atrial arrhythmias
Time Frame: an average of 91 days after catheter ablation
This will be remotely monitored with the Internal loop recorder (ILR) monthly and in clinic every 3 months until the end of the follow up
an average of 91 days after catheter ablation
Time in sinus rhythm as assessed by the percentage of time that the patient remains in sinus rhythm during the pre-established monitoring
Time Frame: 3 months follow up
This will be remotely monitored with the ILR monthly and in clinic every 3 months until the end of the follow up
3 months follow up
Time in sinus rhythm as assessed by the percentage of time that the patient remains in sinus rhythm during the pre-established monitoring
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
This will be remotely monitored with the ILR monthly and in clinic every 3 months until the end of the follow up
6 months follow up
Number of Procedure-related complications
Time Frame: end of study (6 months after procedure)
Complications include Atrio-esophageal fistula, Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), Pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, PV stenosis , Vascular access-related complications , Diaphragmatic paralysis , other severe complications or other non-severe complications 0.37%
end of study (6 months after procedure)
Number of deaths
Time Frame: end of study (6 months after procedure)
end of study (6 months after procedure)
Total radiation exposure dose
Time Frame: end of procedure (about 1.5 hours after start of procedure)
end of procedure (about 1.5 hours after start of procedure)
Number of participants that need a repeat catheter ablation procedure due to documented recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmia
Time Frame: end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
Number of occurrences of any AF (symptomatic or asymptomatic) documented on ECG or ILR
Time Frame: during the first 90 days following catheter ablation.
during the first 90 days following catheter ablation.
Number of participants that visit the emergency room
Time Frame: end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
Number of participants that are hospitalized
Time Frame: end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
Number of incidences of stroke
Time Frame: end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
Change in quality of life as assessed by the Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months after procedure
This is a 6 item questionnaire and the first 5 questions are each is scored from 1(no problem)-5(unable to) for a maximum score of 25, higher number indicating worse outcome. The 6th question is score on likert scale from 0(worst health you can imagine)-100(best health you can imagine), higher score indicating worse outcome
Baseline, 6 months after procedure
Number of participants that show a need for electrical cardioversion
Time Frame: end of procedure till 6 months after procedure
end of procedure till 6 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramesh Hariharan, D, MRCP,FACC, FHRS, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on PVS-PVI targeted ablation

Subscribe