Ophthalmic Multimodal AI-Assisted Medical Decision-Making

April 16, 2025 updated by: Kang Zhang, The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

A Study on Ophthalmic Multimodal AI-Assisted Medical Decision-Making Based on Imaging and Electronic Medical Record Data

This is a multi-center, retrospective clinical study designed to evaluate the application and effectiveness of an AI-assisted medical decision support system, leveraging multimodal data fusion, in ophthalmic clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Visual impairments significantly affect an individual's quality of life. Early screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ocular diseases are crucial for preventing the onset and progression of vision disorders. In clinical practice, ophthalmologists often need to integrate a wide range of patient data, including demographic information, medical history, biochemical markers such as blood glucose and lipid levels, risk factors, as well as various ophthalmic data, such as fundus images, OCT scans, and visual field tests, to make an accurate diagnosis and develop an appropriate treatment plan. In an era where precision and personalized medicine are at the forefront of healthcare, the early detection and diagnosis of eye diseases, as well as the selection of suitable diagnostic and therapeutic strategies at different stages of the disease, have become significant challenges in clinical settings. Recent advancements in medical imaging and analysis techniques have greatly enhanced the accuracy and effectiveness of ocular disease diagnosis. This study aims to develop an ophthalmic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making system by integrating multimodal data from imaging and electronic medical records, in combination with deep learning techniques. The objective is to improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline clinical workflows, and provide more personalized treatment options for patients. Ultimately, this system seeks to enhance treatment outcomes and improve the overall quality of life for patients suffering from ocular diseases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • ZhuHai Hospital, zhuhai, guangdong
        • Contact:
    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical Universit
        • Contact:
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Macau, Macau
        • Recruiting
        • Macau University of Science and Technology Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who have received treatment at multiple centers, including The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, ZhuHai Hospital, and Macau University of Science and Technology Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1.All patients who have received treatment at multiple centers, including The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, ZhuHai Hospital, and Macau University of Science and Technology Hospital.

2.Availability of comprehensive electronic health records (EHR), including: Ophthalmic images (e.g., fundus photography, OCT, or slit-lamp images). Electronic medical records (e.g., diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up notes). Examination results (e.g., visual acuity, intraocular pressure, or laboratory tests). 3.Patients with a clear and confirmed diagnosis of one or more ocular diseases. 4.Patients with sufficient follow-up records to allow assessment of disease progression or prognosis, if applicable.

  1. All ophthalmology patients who have previously received treatment at the Department of Ophthalmology, the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhuhai People's Hospital, and the University Hospital.
  2. Availability of comprehensive electronic health records (EHR), including: Ophthalmic images (e.g., fundus photography, OCT, or slit-lamp images). Electronic medical records (e.g., diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up notes). Examination results (e.g., visual acuity, intraocular pressure, or laboratory tests).
  3. Patients with a clear and confirmed diagnosis of one or more ocular diseases.
  4. Patients with sufficient follow-up records to allow assessment of disease progression or prognosis, if applicable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Incomplete or missing critical EHR components.
  2. Cases with ambiguous or unverified diagnoses that cannot be clearly categorized.
  3. Duplicated or redundant data from the same patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
normal
patients who do not have the ocular diseases
ocular diseases
patients who have ocular diseases
This intervention involves an AI system that leverages multimodal data fusion to support the clinical decision-making and evaluation of ophthalmic diseases. It integrates multi-modal data, including fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient clinical records, to provide real-time, precise, and personalized diagnostic support. Unlike other models, this system utilizes a longitudinal patient dataset to predict disease progression and treatment outcomes.Key distinguishing features include: 1. Multi-Modal Data Integration: Combines imaging, clinical, and genetic data for comprehensive analysis. 2. Predictive Capability: Offers advanced prognostic predictions, enabling personalized treatment plans. 3. Deep Learning Framework: Employs state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. 4. Real-World Validation: Validated using a large cohort of diverse patient data, ensuring generalizability and robustness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: 1 years
AUC of the ROC curve, used to quantify diagnostic accuracy. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a number between 0 and 1).
1 years
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 years
Sensitivity (also called True Positive Rate) is a measure of how well a model identifies positive instances. It is defined as the proportion of actual positive cases correctly identified by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
1 years
Accuracy Accuracy Accuracy
Time Frame: 1 years
Accuracy measures the proportion of all correct predictions (true positives and true negatives) out of the total number of cases evaluated by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
1 years
Specificity
Time Frame: 1 years
Specificity (also called True Negative Rate) measures the proportion of actual negative cases correctly identified by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
1 years
False Positive Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
False Positive Rate (FPR) measures the proportion of actual negative cases that are incorrectly identified as positive by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
1 years
False Negative Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
False Negative Rate (FNR) measures the proportion of actual positive cases that are incorrectly identified as negative by the model. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a percentage).
1 years
Postoperative Complication Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
Percentage (%) of patients experiencing postoperative complications.
1 years
Recurrence Risk Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
Percentage (%) of patients experiencing recurrence during the follow-up period.
1 years
Survival Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
Percentage (%) of patients alive, calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
1 years
Effectiveness of Decision Support
Time Frame: 1 years
Percentage (%) improvement in the accuracy of treatment decisions with AI assistance compared to traditional decisions.
1 years
Decision Time Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 years
Average time (seconds) required for physicians to make diagnostic and treatment decisions, before and after AI assistance.
1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Score
Time Frame: 1 years
Evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS), with scores ranging from 0-100.
1 years
AI System Response Time
Time Frame: 1 years
Average time (seconds) taken for the AI to provide recommendations after data input.
1 years
System Failure Rate
Time Frame: 1 years
Frequency of AI system failures, measured as failures per thousand hours of use (failures/thousand hours).
1 years
User Interface Design Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 years
Evaluated using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), with scores ranging from 1-7.
1 years
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 1 years
Measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), with scores ranging from 8-32.
1 years
Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: 1 years
Percentage (%) of patients adhering to personalized treatment plans and regular follow-up visits.
1 years
Physician Acceptance of AI System
Time Frame: 1 years
Evaluated using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) scale, with scores ranging from 1-7.
1 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kang Zhang, PhD., The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Test: AI-Based Diagnostic and Prognostic Model for Ocular Diseases

Subscribe