The Effect of Walking and Grounding in Women With Breast Cancer

August 10, 2025 updated by: Baise Bicav, Ankara University

The Effect of Walking and Grounding on Pain Intensity, Fatigue Level, and Sleep Quality in Women With Breast Cancer

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine the effect of walking and grounding on pain intensity, fatigue level and sleep quality in women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Grounding is the flow of electrons by direct contact of the body's natural electric charge with the earth. There are many methods of grounding. Earthing systems can be used while sitting or sleeping, or the cheapest and easiest way is to walk barefoot in a grassy park, garden or beach. Earthing improves circulation by increasing blood flow and oxygenation of each organ system, positively affecting cardiovascular function. Hormones normalize, cortisol drops, blood sugar stabilizes, sleep improves, energy increases and inflammation decreases. When electrical contact between the body and the earth is re-established through grounding, organ system function begins to optimize again. When people are grounded, they feel more alive, healthy and energized than when they are ungrounded. The literature reports that human grounding has many positive effects on pain, sleep and fatigue. Grounding can be an effective method in managing pain, fatigue and sleep problems, which are among the most common problems in patients with breast cancer. Earthing is one of the biggest challenges of the modern world. City life, contact with the land The decline of the earth's energy supply, living and working indoors, and wearing plastic shoes disrupt our natural energy circuit. Although barefoot walking is the cheapest and easiest way to become grounded, dirty soil, foot This method may be a disadvantage for women with breast cancer due to conditions such as wounding of the base. In this study, a conductive device is used for grounding cancer patients by providing indirect contact with the soil.

grounding will be ensured while walking with the stick. While grounding has many positive effects on health, no grounding study was found in the literature review in the field of nursing. This study is a part of both the It is thought to positively affect the pain, fatigue and sleep problems of women with breast cancer by walking with shoes and providing grounding in order to use the positive effects of grounding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Gazi University Health Research and Application Center Gazi Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older,
  • Can read and write and speak Turkish,
  • Diagnosed with primary breast cancer and know the diagnosis,
  • Volunteered to participate in the research,
  • Living in Ankara province,
  • Paclitaxel or Paclitaxel-Transtuzumab based chemotherapy treatment initiated,
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale 0 or 1,
  • NCI-CTCAE v5.0 Pain, fatigue and sleep toxicity grade 1 or 2,
  • You have a phone with an iOS or Android processor,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open wounds or edema of the hands and feet,
  • NCI-CTCAE v5.0 motor and sensory peripheral neuropathy with toxicity grade 3,4 or 5,
  • People with a disability that would prevent them from walking,
  • Diagnosed cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders,
  • Diagnosed psychiatric illness,
  • Communication problems,
  • Bone metastases,
  • Bilateral mastectomies,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Walking Group
Patients will walk for 30 minutes at least 3 times a week.
Patients will be asked to walk for 30 minutes at least 3 times for 8 weeks. In order to ensure regular follow-up, patients will be asked to write on the walking tracking form when they walk and the number of steps before they start walking and the number of steps after walking using the application.
Experimental: Grounding Group
Patients will walk with a grounding stick for 30 minutes at least 3 times a week.
Patients will be asked to walk with a grounding stick for 30 minutes at least 3 times for 8 weeks. Patients will be asked to fill in the walking follow-up form and grounding follow-up form for regular follow-up.
No Intervention: Control Group
Routine follow-up will be done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 0,4,8 weeks

It will be used in the study to measure pain, fatigue, and sleep severity. The VAS consists of a measured horizontal or vertical line with definitions such as "no symptoms" or "severe symptoms" at both ends. The severity of the patient's symptoms is measured by marking a numbered point on this line. For pain symptoms, the severity is marked on a 10 cm (100 mm) ruler with "no pain" at one end and "unbearable pain" at the other. The intervals for pain severity are defined as follows: <3 mild pain, 3-6 moderate pain, >6 severe pain. The VAS is a reliable and valid method for assessing pain intensity (Arslan et al., 2016). The VAS will also be used to assess fatigue and sleep intensity. It is marked as 0 none to 10 very much.

It is measured as 0 none, 1-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and 7-9 severe.

0,4,8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Similarity Scale for Fatigue
Time Frame: 0,4,8 weeks
The scale consists of 18 items and two subscales: fatigue (items 1-5, 11-18) and energy (items 6-10). There are 10 cm long horizontal lines with positive and negative statements at one end and negative statements at the other end of the FLSS, respectively. While the items of the fatigue subscale progress from positive to negative, the energy subscale has the opposite order. The lowest score obtained from the fatigue subscale is 0 and the highest score is 130. In the energy subscale, the scores are in the range of 0 to 50. A high score on the fatigue subscale and a low score on the energy subscale indicates that the severity of fatigue is high. In the validity and reliability study of the scale, it was reported that the Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficient for the 13-item fatigue subscale was 0.90 and 0.74 for the 5-item energy subscale.
0,4,8 weeks
Pittssburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 0,4,8 weeks
The Pittsburgh sleep quality index is a reliable and consistent sleep questionnaire that includes 24 questions to assess sleep quality, amount of sleep, presence and severity of sleep disturbance in the last one month. Its diagnostic sensitivity is 89.6% and specificity is 86.5%. The PSQI consists of seven components assessing subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency-established sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, sleep medication use, and impairment in daytime activities. Some of these components consist of a single question, while others are a grouping of several questions. Scoring consists of the scores given to the questions or groups of questions covered by these components. The sum of the scores of the seven components gives the total PDQI score. Each question is evaluated on a 0-3 point scale. The total score has a value between 0-21. A high total score indicates poor sleep quality
0,4,8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Baise Bicav, MSc, Ankara University
  • Principal Investigator: Sevinç Kutlutürkan, PhD, Ankara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AÜ-HEM-BB-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Walking Group

Subscribe