Investigation of the Relationship Between Peripheral and Central Metabolic Changes Induced by GLP-1 Agonists (GLPsy)

February 4, 2025 updated by: Nils Opel
This study aims to investigate the acute effects of Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist established in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, on brain metabolism, brain network function, and executive functioning as well as mood in healthy, normal-weight individuals. Given the emerging evidence of GLP-1's impact on brain function, including the modulation of reward processing and cognitive functions, this study will focus on the physiological changes induced by Liraglutide and their potential implications for brain health. The overall goal of this study is to assess how acute GLP-1 administration influences systemic and brain metabolism to modulate brain signalling and behaviour.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a hormone secreted primarily by intestinal epithelial cells that plays a central role in promoting insulin secretion and reducing hunger and food intake. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, has established benefits in regulating blood glucose and appetite and also directly acts on the brain through GLP-1 receptors. These receptors are widely distributed across brain regions, with high densities in the hypothalamus, brain stem, hippocampus, and in reward-related areas such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). However, the underlying effects of GLP-1 receptor activation on brain metabolism and functional brain networks remain poorly understood.

This study will address several key questions regarding the molecular, cellular, and cognitive changes that occur following the acute administration of Liraglutide. In particular, the investigation will focus on how GLP-1 administration modulates peripheral and central metabolism and on the influence of changes in brain metabolism on signaling. Furthermore, the relationship between brain metabolism, signaling, and psychological as well as cognitive outcomes will be examined.

Magnet resonance spectroscopy (MRS) will be used to measure changes in brain metabolism, with a focus on alterations in key metabolic pathways involved in neuronal function and energy homeostasis. In addition, biochemical profiles in blood will be examined to assess how peripheral metabolic changes may reflect or influence brain metabolism. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will also be employed to determine whether the observed alterations in brain metabolism correlate with changes in brain network connectivity and activity. Finally, correlations between these metabolic and connectivity changes and improvements in cognitive function and psychological parameters, such as executive function and mood (compared to placebo), will be evaluated.

The expected outcomes of this study are important insights into the neurobiological effects of Liraglutide and its potential to influence brain metabolism and functional dynamics. By elucidating the impact of GLP-1 analogues on brain metabolism and cognitive function, a better understanding of how metabolic regulation can affect brain signaling is anticipated. Given the prevalence of cognitive deficits in various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including obesity and type 2 diabetes, this research has the potential to contribute to the development of future therapeutic strategies involving GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thuringia
      • Jena, Thuringia, Germany, 07743
        • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Jena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Normal weight at study inclusion (BMI 18.5-25)
  • Generally good physical condition without serious previous illnesses

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI contraindication: cardiac pacemakers, hearing aids, neurostimulation, insulin pumps, other potentially ferromagnetic implants, screws, clips, prostheses, metal splinters, etc., pregnancy, claustrophobia, extensive tattoos, medication that impairs thermoregulation
  • Comorbidity: neurological or psychiatric conditions, cognitive impairments, chronic somatic disorders
  • Intake of more than 40g of pure alcohol (for men) or more than 20g of pure alcohol (for women), smoking, regular drug use
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Current or within the past five years eating disorder, vegan diet or fasting within the past six months
  • Regular medication intake
  • Liraglutide contraindications: Hypersensitivity to liraglutide or other components of the medication, medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN2) in personal or family history, history of pancreatitis, current pregnancy or breastfeeding, severe gastrointestinal motility disorders including gastroparesis, severe or terminal renal insufficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GLP-1 then Placebo
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive equivalent volumes of either Placebo (NaCl) or 0.6 mg of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector Liraglutide (GLP-1 Agonist) in a randomized, counterbalanced order. The administration will occur at two time points: T1 and T3 with a washout period of at least 1 day between the two interventions to minimize carryover effects.
0.6 mg of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector Liraglutide (GLP-1 Agonist)
Other Names:
  • GLP-1 Agonist
0.1 mL NaCl
Experimental: Placebo then GLP-1
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive equivalent volumes of either Placebo (NaCl) or 0.6 mg of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector Liraglutide (GLP-1 Agonist) in a randomized, counterbalanced order. The administration will occur at two time points: T1 and T3 with a washout period of at least 1 day between the two interventions to minimize carryover effects.
0.6 mg of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector Liraglutide (GLP-1 Agonist)
Other Names:
  • GLP-1 Agonist
0.1 mL NaCl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychology: Processing speed
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Number Symbol Test, Letter-Number-Symbol Test, TMT-A. A composite score for processing speed will be derived from the Number Symbol Test, Letter-Number Symbol Test, and TMT-A. First, raw scores from each test will be normalized (e.g., converted into z-scores), taking into account that lower completion times on the TMT-A indicate better performance. The normalized scores will then be combined-after adjusting the direction of scores if necessary-by calculating their average to yield a single, unified measure of processing speed.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Neuropsychology: Attention
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
TMT-B, D2-Test. A composite attention score will be created using the D2-Test and TMT-B. Raw scores from both tests will be standardized (e.g., as z-scores). For tests such as the TMT-B, if necessary, the scores will be adjusted (e.g., reverse-coded) so that higher values indicate better attention performance. The resulting standardized scores will be averaged to form a unified attention measure.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Neuropsychology: Memory
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
VLMT-A, block span. A composite memory score will be computed from the VLM-T and Block Span test. Raw scores from each test will be standardized (e.g., into z-scores). These z-scores will then be averaged to yield a single measure of memory performance, reflecting both verbal and visuospatial working memory components.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Neuropsychology: Verbal Fluency
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
MWT-B, Regensburg Word Fluency Test. A composite score for verbal fluency will be derived from the Regensburg Word Fluency Test and the MWT-B. First, raw scores for each test will be converted to standardized scores (e.g., z-scores). If needed, scores will be adjusted so that higher values consistently represent better performance. The standardized scores will then be averaged to create a single composite measure of verbal fluency.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
MR spectroscopy
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
metabolites between 0-4 ppm in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), medial cingulate cortex (MCC), and anterior insula
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Exploratory Proteomics of Autophagy Processes I
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
protein levels of autophagy biomarkers (e.g. LC3II & p62) of isolated PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) by Western Blotting
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Exploratory Proteomics of Autophagy Processes II
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
protein levels and protein phosphorylation by targeted and untargeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics and phosphoproteomics of isolated PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells)
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional MRI
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
resting state connectivity
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Structural MR imaging
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
cortical thickness, grey matter volume
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Sleep
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The 19 self-rated questions of the PSQI are grouped into 7 components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3 points. The scores of the 7 components are then summed to yield a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Depression
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Beck's depression inventory (BDI-II). The questionnaire consists of 21 questions. Each question is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from no impairment (0) to severe impairment (3). The maximum score is 63.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
State-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S). For the STAI-S assessment, specific items (1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, and 20) were reverse-coded because they represent aspects of anxiety expressed in a negative direction. After recoding, responses for all STAI-S items were summed to obtain the final test score for state anxiety.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Anhedonia
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure-Scale (SHAPS). For scoring, each non-affirmative response ("does not apply" or "does not apply at all") is assigned 1 point, while each affirmative response is assigned 0 points. The points are summed across all items, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of anhedonia.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Life quality
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Positive Mental Health Scale. 9 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("do not agree") to 3 ("completely agree"). A total score is computed by summing the responses to all items, with higher scores indicating greater positive mental health.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Numeric Analog Scales
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Assessing mood on 0-10 points and sleep duration on 0-13 points scale
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Fatigue
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), 10-item self-assessment scale. For scoring, responses to items 1-3 and 5-9 are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, while items 4 and 10 are reverse-coded (scored from 5 to 1). The scores for all items are then summed to produce the total FAS score.
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Metabolic processes
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Targeted and quantitative analysis by mass spectrometry
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Lipid profiling
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Targeted and quantitative analysis by mass spectrometry
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Transcription expression patterns
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Gene expression profile by RNA sequencing of isolated PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells)
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Proteome/phosphoproteome/ubiquitinome patterns
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
proteome expression patterns through blood based proteome, phosphoproteome, and ubiquitinome analysis
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Exosomal protein patterns
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months
Evaluate exosomal protein content through blood based metabolome analysis
Outcome measures are assessed during a one-week on-site visit per participant (placebo vs. liraglutide days) within an overall study period of 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, PD Dr med, Goethe University
  • Principal Investigator: Nils Gassen, Prof Dr, University Hospital, Bonn

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe