Preoperative Cardiology Consultation and the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events(MACE) (MACE)

March 25, 2025 updated by: Jingsheng Lou, Chinese PLA General Hospital

The Relationship Between Preoperative Cardiology Consultation and the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Without Cardiac Surgery--A Retrospective Cohort Study

This cohort study aims to determine when preoperative cardiology consultation is needed to reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The study collected data on elderly patients with preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) results who underwent non-cardiac surgery. It was conducted at the First Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2015 to August 2019. MACE was defined as a composite event occurring within 30 days postoperatively, including acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, new-onset severe arrhythmias, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and cardiac death. Data were extracted using structured query language (SQL) and reviewed by three experienced clinicians. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated. Additionally, the study aimed to identify which categories of ECG findings necessitate cardiology consultation to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events, thereby optimizing the cardiology consultation process.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the important methods for perioperative assessment. It can reflect the patient's cardiac condition to a certain extent and indicate the potential risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). When a patient has an abnormal preoperative ECG, the standard medical procedure is to consult with a cardiologist to assess cardiac risk and adjust cardiac function, thereby reducing the incidence of adverse cardiac events. However, some studies suggest that cardiology consultation may delay surgery for elderly fracture patients and that consultation does not affect the prognosis of some abdominal surgery patients. Conversely, other studies indicate that cardiology consultation can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Additionally, when the patient has a normal ECG, cardiology consultation is usually not provided. Yet, elderly patients often have multiple chronic diseases, and a normal ECG does not completely rule out cardiac problems, which significantly increases the incidence of adverse cardiac events. Therefore, identifying risk factors to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events in elderly non-cardiac surgery patients is particularly important.

Objectives:

To investigate the circumstances in which preoperative cardiology consultation is needed to reduce the incidence rate of MACE.

Methods:

MACE was defined as the composite of acute myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, heart failure (HF), new-onset severe arrhythmia, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and cardiac death, occurring during or within 30 days following non-cardiac surgery. MACE cases were identified by reviewing medical records. Structured query language (SQL) was employed to extract relevant data elements, including postoperative biochemical tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), coronary angiograms, postoperative progress notes, and consultation reports. Patients could experience multiple MACE events. Three experienced clinicians conducted independent evaluations of complications. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus. This cohort study involved non-cardiac surgery patients from the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, covering the period from January 2015 to August 2019. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated. Additionally, the study aimed to identify which categories of ECG findings necessitate cardiology consultation to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events, thereby optimizing the cardiology consultation process.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Select elderly patients who underwent elective surgery at the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to August 2019. All subjects will sign an informed consent form; patients who cannot sign the informed consent form will be provided with verbal informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years;
  • Preoperative ECG results available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 65 years;
  • Accepted cardiac or neuro surgery;
  • Second surgery within 30 days post-operation;
  • Patient refused to follow up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Risk Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Identify risk factors through the incidence of major adverse cardiac events occurring within 30 days post-surgery, and analyze the benefits to patients through the intervention of cardiology consultations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE
Time Frame: within 30 days post-surgery
The entire sample was divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk predictors of MACE and to establish a nomogram with statistically significant predictors. The development cohort was used to construct the MACE prediction model, while the data from the validation cohort were used for validation. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated.
within 30 days post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jingsheng Lou, PhD & MD, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Given the sensitive nature of the questions posed in this study, we assured participants that their raw data would remain confidential. Therefore, the raw numerical data used to extrapolate the graphs/charts are not present within the manuscript and will not be disclosed. These data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Death, Sudden

Subscribe