SMART Pilot Trial of Glycemic Screening Outreach

May 13, 2026 updated by: Kenrik Duru, University of California, Los Angeles
Approximately 130 million Americans have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes (T2D) but remain unscreened and/or unaware of their diagnosis. While prediabetes/T2D screening, also known as glycemic screening, is endorsed in national guidelines, there is almost no research on how to increase screening rates, or evaluations of interventions testing the effectiveness of screening promotion strategies. The American Medical Association has published prediabetes quality measures that apply to UCLA Health as well as all other health systems, specifically tracking the percentage of adult patients with risk factors for T2D due for glycemic screening for whom the screening process was initiated. However, there is no current systemic effort underway at UCLA, or most other health systems, to encourage glycemic screening. We are proposing a pilot trial of the first SMART (Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial) for glycemic screening. Our SMART experiment will provide preliminary feasibility and acceptability data for a larger, multisite trial that will provide vital guidance to optimize screening approaches for a growing number of screening-eligible patients so that they may seek earlier detection, treatment, and/or access to lifestyle programs and interventions for T2D or prediabetes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Overweight or obese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing type 2 diabetes, A1c drawn within past 3 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Initial text, follow-up text, letter
Participants are initially randomized to glycemic screening invitations by text, and then if they are not screened within 30 days, then they are re-rerandomized to another glycemic screening invitation by text. If they are still not screened in another 30 days then they receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening.
Participants receive a text message encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening
Experimental: Initial portal, follow-up portal, letter
Participants are initially randomized to glycemic screening invitations by patient portal, and then if they are not screened within 30 days, then they are re-rerandomized to another glycemic screening invitation by patient portal. If they are still not screened in another 30 days then they receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening.
Participants receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a patient portal message encouraging glycemic screening
Experimental: Initial text, follow-up portal, letter
Participants are initially randomized to glycemic screening invitations by text, and then if they are not screened within 30 days, then they are re-rerandomized to another glycemic screening invitation by patient portal. If they are still not screened in another 30 days then they receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening.
Participants receive a text message encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a patient portal message encouraging glycemic screening
Experimental: Initial portal, follow-up text, letter
Participants are initially randomized to glycemic screening invitations by patient portal, and then if they are not screened within 30 days, then they are re-rerandomized to another glycemic screening invitation by text. If they are still not screened in another 30 days then they receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening.
Participants receive a text message encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a mailed letter encouraging glycemic screening
Participants receive a patient portal message encouraging glycemic screening
No Intervention: Usual care
Patients do not receive any glycemic screening invitations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 90 days
Receipt of hemoglobin A1c screening for dysglycemia
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability Survey
Time Frame: 90 Days

The survey contained 5 questions, in Likert response format, and possible total scores ranged from 0 - 24 , with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.

  1. How did you feel about the messages recommending that you come in for a blood test to check your hemoglobin A1c (blood sugar) level - Likert responses (Very positive, positive, neutral, negative, very negative)
  2. How clear were the messages recommending that you come in for a blood test to check your hemoglobin A1c (blood sugar) level - Likert responses (Very clear, somewhat clear, neutral, somewhat unclear, very unclear)
  3. Did the messages affect the chances that you would get the hemoglobin A1c (blood sugar) level - Likert responses (Major effect, moderate effect, neutral, minor effect, no effect)
  4. Did the messages cause you any anxiety or stress - Likert responses (To a great extent, somewhat, very little, not at all)
  5. How concerned were you that the messages were from scammers not associated with
90 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Obidiugwu K Duru, MD, MS, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We may or may not attempt to publish this pilot trial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Text message

Subscribe