- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07137299
- Original Trial
POPQ Associated With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (POP-LAP)
POPQ Associated With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy - Multicenter Prospective Observational Study - POP-LAP STUDY
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) techniques on the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (situation when one or more of your pelvic organs like your bladder, uterus, or rectum have dropped down or slipped out of their normal position, sometimes even bulging into the vagina) and urinary incontinence (leaking urine unexpectedly) in women aged 18-85 who underwent hysterectomy or supracervical hysterectomy (removing of the uterus without its cervix) for benign (not cancer) conditions.
The main question is: to check how different surgical technique (laparoscopic, with opening the abdomen, vaginal and robotic) increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence There is no randomization or control group; comparisons will be made between surgery types based on clinical and questionnaire data.
Participants will:
- Receive an invitation to participate if they underwent hysterectomy between 2021-2025.
- Fill out validated quality of life questionnaires (P-QOL, POPDI-6, PFIQ-7) every two years.
- Attend follow-up clinical pelvic exams every two years to assess vaginal cuff healing, pelvic organ prolapses (POP-Q system), and urinary symptoms.
This prospective, non-commercial, multicenter study plans to enroll 2,000 women and will run from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2036
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
What Is This Study About? This is a long-term observational study that aims to understand whether different surgical techniques for removing the uterus affect women's risk of developing pelvic floor disorders, such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence, after surgery.
Pelvic organ prolapse occurs when pelvic organs like the uterus or bladder drop from their normal position and push against the vaginal walls. It is a common condition, especially in women after menopause, and can significantly affect quality of life.
Why Is This Study Important? Each year, thousands of women undergo hysterectomies (surgical removal of the uterus) for non-cancerous reasons. However, it's still unclear whether certain types of hysterectomy procedures may lead to a higher or lower risk of pelvic floor problems in the years following surgery. This study seeks to provide reliable answers to help improve patient safety and long-term outcomes.
What Questions Is the Study Trying to Answer?
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does total laparoscopic hysterectomy increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence compared to supracervical hysterectomy?
- Does total laparoscopic hysterectomy increase the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction compared to abdominal or vaginal approaches?
- Does the use of robotic techniques reduce the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy?
- Does robotic supracervical hysterectomy reduce the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction compared to standard laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy?
Who Can Participate? The study will include about 2,000 women who had their uterus removed or partially removed between 2021 and 2025 for benign conditions.
Participants must be:
- 18 to 85 years old
- Willing to give informed consent
- Not suffering from severe chronic illness (ECOG ≥ 2)
- Not previously diagnosed with pelvic floor problems before surgery What Will Participants Be Asked to Do?
Participants will:
- Receive a letter inviting them to join the study
- Complete quality-of-life questionnaires (Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Inventory 6 (POPDI-6), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form ( PFIQ-7).every two years about symptoms related to pelvic floor dysfunction and urinary incontinence
- Undergo a gynecological exam every two years to assess healing and signs of prolapse using a standardized method (POP-Q) If a participant chooses not to have a physical exam, only questionnaire data will be used.
Where Is the Study Taking Place?
The study is being conducted at multiple leading medical centers in Poland:
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, CMKP, Warsaw
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Warsaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Szpital Zakonu Bonifratrów pw. Aniołów Stróżów w Katowice
Is the Study Safe? Yes. This is an observational study, which means no new treatments or procedures are being tested. It involves only questionnaires and routine medical exams, so there is no additional risk to the participants.
When Will the Study Take Place?
- Start date: July 1, 2025
- End date: July 1, 2036 This long observation period allows researchers to understand how pelvic floor health changes years after surgery.
What Do Researchers Hope to Achieve? The ultimate goal is to guide medical professionals and patients in choosing the most appropriate surgical technique for removing the uterus for benign causes, based on long-term outcomes. By identifying which methods are safer for pelvic floor health, this research could help reduce the number of women who develop prolapse or incontinence after surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Krzysztof Nowosielski, professor
- Phone Number: +48 502027943
- Email: knowosielski@sum.edu.pl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Katowice, Poland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Szpital Zakonu Bonifratrów pw. Aniołów Stróżów
-
Contact:
- Rafał Stojko, Professor
- Phone Number: +48 32 357 62 10
- Email: katowice@bcmbonifratrzy.pl
-
Warszawa, Poland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Warsaw
-
Contact:
- Artur Ludwin, Professor
- Phone Number: +48 22 583 03 01
- Email: artur.ludwin@wum.edu.pl
-
Warszawa, Poland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Szpital Bielański
-
Contact:
- Filip Dąbrowski, Professor
- Phone Number: +48 22 56-90-274
- Email: ginekologia@bielanski.med.pl
-
-
Slaskie
-
Katowice, Slaskie, Poland, 40-752
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecological Oncology, University Clinical Centre, Medical University of Silesia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- persons who underwent total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions regardless of the type of surgery
- agree to participate and to follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
- having uterus
- health state - ECOG >2
- pelvic organ prolapse prior to the surgery
- surgery due to malignant conditions (ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Lap-hyst
Women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
|
Robot-hyst
Women who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
|
Vaginal-Hyst
Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
|
Abdom-Hyst
Women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
|
SAH
Women who underwent supracervical abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
|
LASH
Women who underwent Laparoscopic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy for benign conditions
|
All study participants will be evaluated to assess:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of urinary incontinence
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
Ingelmann-Sundberg scale for symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. The Ingelmann-Sundberg scale is a grading system used to assess the severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). It categorizes SUI based on the degree of physical activity that provokes urine leakage. The scale has three grades, with Grade I being the mildest and Grade III the most severe. Grade I - Urine leakage occurs with a relevant increase in abdominal pressure, such as during coughing, sneezing, or laughing. Grade II - Urine leakage occurs with a lesser increase in abdominal pressure, such as during activities like running, picking up objects from the floor, or walking. Grade III - Urine leakage occurs with minimal physical exertion, such as during walking, stair climbing, or even while standing or lying down. The assessment is based on medical interview with the patient performed during clinical visit. |
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of overactive bladder.
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
OABSS Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was used to assess symptoms of overactive bladder.
The scale consists of 7 questions on a five-point Likert scale that refer to every symptom of OAB: 1 for nocturia, 1 for urinary frequency, 3 for urgency, 1 for urge incontinence, and 1 generic question about bladder control.
The total result is scored from 0 to 28, with patients with higher scores reporting worse symptoms.
|
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
POPQ - Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification. The assessment is based on gynecological examination. The system measures the position of the most distal portion of the prolapse to the hymen level. 5 stages are described:
|
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: up to 30 days postoperatively
|
Assessment of complications after hysterectomy/uterine amputation based on Clavien-Dindo Classification. The Clavien-Dindo Classification consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). It assesses the complications of the surgery in order to rank them in an objective and reproducible manner. Grade I - Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions Grade II- Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III - Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IV - Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications) requiring Intensive Care Unit management Grade V - Death of a patient |
up to 30 days postoperatively
|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using P-QOL
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
P-QOL - Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire.
The scale consisted of 38 questions, with 20 questions representing nine quality of life domains (general health perception, prolapse impact, role and physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotional problems, sleep/energy disturbances and symptoms severity) and 18 questions about prolapse symptoms.
The responses ranged from "none/not at all" through "slightly/a little" and "moderately" to "a lot".
A four-point scoring system for each item is used for severity measurement of urogenital prolapse symptoms.
The questionnaire does not form the combined score.
If a woman has only one domain affected and another woman has all domains affected, both will be considered symptomatic but in different aspects of life quality.
Higher scores indicate a greater impairment of quality of life, and lower scores indicate a good quality of life.
|
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using POPDI-6
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
POPDI-6 - Pelvic Organ Prolapse Inventory 6.
The scale is a six-item questionnaire used to assess the level of distress caused by pelvic organ prolapse symptom.
Each of the six items is scored on a scale, ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no distress and higher scores indicate greater distress.
The scores range from 0 to 24, where higher scores indicate greater distress from pelvic organ prolapse symptoms
|
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
|
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using PFIQ-7
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
PFIQ-7 - Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form is a 7-item questionnaire used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on a woman's quality of life.
It measures the impact of urinary symptoms (UIQ-7), pelvic organ prolapse symptoms (PIPQ-7) and colorectal/anal symptoms (CRAIQ-7) on daily life.
Each item is scored on a Likert scale (0, Not at all; 1, somewhat; 2, moderately; 3, quite a bit), and scores from each scale can be combined to provide an overall impact score.
The score for subscale ranges from 0 to 100 and for total score - 0-300.
Higher scores represent greater impact on daily life.
|
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Uterine Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Hemorrhage
- Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue
- Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue
- Uterine Hemorrhage
- Hyperplasia
- Prolapse
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Leiomyoma
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
- Metrorrhagia
Other Study ID Numbers
- POP-LAP1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endometrial Hyperplasia
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingEndometrial Cancer and Endometrial HyperplasiaEgypt
-
CHU de ReimsUnknownEndometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial CancersFrance
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedAtypical Endometrial HyperplasiaEgypt
-
Xiaojun ChenCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia Without AtypiaChina
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia Without AtypiaTurkey
-
West China Second University HospitalRecruitingAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial CancerChina
-
IRCCS Burlo GarofoloCompletedAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia | Atypical Endometrial PolypsItaly
-
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern LinzCompletedEndometrial Cancer | Atypical HyperplasiaAustria
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia | Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma | Endometrial Adenocarcinoma | Stage IA Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage IB Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage IIIA Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage IIIB Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage IIIC Endometrial Carcinoma | Stage... and other conditions
-
Sohag UniversityCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial AdenocarcinomaEgypt
Clinical Trials on Questionnaire and Physical Exam
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleRecruitingSleep | Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)Italy
-
Poitiers University HospitalNot yet recruitingCognitive Impairment | Alzheimer Disease | Deafness | Memory | Neuropsychological Tests | Sign Language
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompleted
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingPrognathism | Psychiatric Disorders | Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresItaly
-
Bahria UniversityNot yet recruitingCardiac Patients
-
Wei XIA, PhDNot yet recruitingAddiction | Drug MisuseChina
-
Bursa City HospitalCompleted
-
Marmara UniversityCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierNot yet recruitingFall Prevention | Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeFrance