Comparison of Conventional and Retroclavicular Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

December 8, 2025 updated by: İbrahim Topcu, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Comparison of Conventional and Retroclavicular Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Obese Patients

Forearm and hand surgeries are among the most frequently performed surgical interventions both in trauma patients and electively.In these procedures, alternative anesthesia methods such as general anesthesia, regional intravenous anesthesia, regional peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthesia are available.

Peripheral nerve blockade can be used for anesthesia and analgesia.This method allows patients to undergo surgery without general anesthesia and increases patient satisfaction by providing effective analgesia in the postoperative period.

The aim of this study was to compare the conventional and retroclavicular approaches to infraclavicular block in patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06170
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18-80 years of age
  • Those with ASA score II-III
  • Those with a body mass index (BMI) >30
  • Patients who are suitable for forearm and hand surgery under regional anesthesia in the operating room

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot perceive and evaluate pain
  • Patients who want to have surgery under general anesthesia
  • Patients in whom regional anesthesia is contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional approach to infraclavicular block
After the patients are monitored and placed in the supine position, after appropriate field sterilization, Conventional approach to infraclavicular block will be performed on the patients using 25 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine + 5 ml 2% lidocaine) under ultrasound guidance.
Conventional approach to infraclavicular block will be performed on the patients using 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine 5ml of %2 lidocaine under ultrasound guidance.
Active Comparator: Retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular block
After the patients are monitored and placed in the supine position, after appropriate field sterilization, Retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular block will be performed on the patients using 25 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine + 5 ml 2% lidocaine) under ultrasound guidance.
Retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular block will be performed on the patients using 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine 5ml of %2 lidocaine under ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Block Performance Time
Time Frame: During regional anesthesia
Total block performance time (from skin puncture to needle removal) will be recorded
During regional anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
Pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain) at rest and when coughing. Pain assessment will be made at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery.
Up to 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 day
Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score was used as the satisfaction score. The patient-reported Turkish QoR-15 score includes 15 questions that evaluate the patient's postoperative recovery. The QoR-15 score is grouped under two groups, A and B. A high QoR-15 score, a score between 0 (poor) and 10 (excellent) for each item, and a total score of 150 indicate better quality of recovery.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 5, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Management

Clinical Trials on Conventional approach to infraclavicular block

Subscribe