Comparative Study of Two Infraclavicular Block Approaches in Forearm Surgery

December 13, 2025 updated by: Sargodha Medical College

A Comparative Study of Retroclavicular and Classical Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks Using 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Forearm Surgery.

It is hypothesized that retro clavicular Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is better than classical coracoid Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing forearm surgery

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Sargodha, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 40100
        • Dr Faisal Masood teaching Hospital Sargodha

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients from 18-60 years.
  2. Male Patients
  3. Elective forearm surgery
  4. BMI ≤30kg/m2
  5. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status ≤III

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of known allergy or hypersensitivity against study drug.
  2. Previous surgery on the same limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Retroclavicular approch
Use of 25 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine via Retroclavicular Approach
The retro clavicular approach to the Infraclavicular brachial plexus block will be performed by placing probe parasagittally just medial to the coracoid process and caudal from the clavicle. The needle insertion point was located in the supraclavicular fossa, just medial to the shoulder at a point sufficiently posterior to the clavicle and medial to the trapezius muscle insertion point on the clavicle. The needle will be inserted immediately above the clavicle in the space between the coracoid process and the clavicle and advanced from cephalad to caudal.
Other: Classic coracoid approch
Classic Coracoid Infraclavicular Block with 25 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine
The coracoid approach to the Infraclavicular brachial plexus block will be performed by placing the ultrasound probe parasagittally just medial to the coracoid process and caudal from the clavicle. The needle will be inserted cephalad to the ultrasound probe using an in-plane technique and advanced in a caudal direction toward the posterior aspect of the axillary artery, in the vicinity of the posterior cord of the brachial plexus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1 onset of motor block.
Time Frame: Intraoperatively

Onset of motor block assess using modified bromage scale

Score Grade of motor blockade(Modified bromage scale) 0 Normal muscle function with full range of movement of elbow, wrist and fingers .

1 Decreased muscle power so that patient can move fingers and /or wrist only 2. Complete loss of muscle function with no movement in fingers/wrist

Intraoperatively
Onset of sensory Block
Time Frame: Intraoperatively l

Onset of sensory block assess using pin prick method Grade of sensory blockade Score

  1. Feeling sharp pinprick (no block) 0
  2. Blunt sensation on pinprick (partial block 1
  3. No sensation on pinprick (complete block) 2
Intraoperatively l
Block adequate for surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Block adequate for surgery when there is no need for local infiltration and general anesthesia
Intraoperatively
Needle Shadow and shaft visibility using 5 point likert scale.
Time Frame: Intraoperatively

NEEDLE SHADOW VISIBILITY 5-POINT LIKERT SCALE SCORE Needle tip visibility

  1. Very poor
  2. Poor
  3. Fair
  4. Good
  5. Very good

5-POINT LIKERT SCALE SCORE Needle Shaft visibility

  1. None of the shaft visualized
  2. Only a small segment of the shaft visualized
  3. Less than half of the shaft visualized
  4. Almost all of the shaft visualized
  5. The entire shaft visualized
Intraoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rescue anesthesia requirement
Time Frame: Intraoperatively after regional block
Rescue anesthesia given when block is not adequate for surgery such as local infiltration and general anesthesia
Intraoperatively after regional block
Complication
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Vascular puncture and pneumothorax
Intraoperatively
Procedure Time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
Time from insertion of needle to removal of needle
Intraoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMC-ANS-2025-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Procedure Time

Clinical Trials on Retroclavicular infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Subscribe