A Comparison Of Dental Arch Analysis Using 3d Digital Scanning Versus Conventional Methods In Children (Arch analysis)

May 8, 2026 updated by: Nehal Salman, Pharos University in Alexandria

A Comparison Of Dental Arch Analysis Using 3d Digital Scanning Versus Conventional Methods In Children(A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial)

A crossover study will be conducted on 20 pediatric patients aged 7-11 years. For each participant, the upper and lower study models will be processed using two methods: the conventional method, which involves alginate impressions, and the digital method, which utilizes a 3D intraoral digital scanner (CEREC Omnicam scanner or equivalent). Measurements of arch length, arch width, and arch depth will be taken from both model types using the conventional method with a brass wire and a digital caliper. At the same time, in the scan cast, they will be calculated digitally by 3D shape software. Statistical analysis will be done to compare the results of both methods.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Pharos University in Alexandria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy Children aged 7-11 years old (ASA 1).
  2. Class I with normal development of occlusion .
  3. Absence of dental extractions.
  4. Absence of previous removable or fixed orthodontic treatments.
  5. Patients with fully erupted permanent first molars.
  6. Children with Frankel behavioral rating scale 2,3 and 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Delayed erupted 1st permanent molar.
  2. Teeth with severe rotation.
  3. Dental agenesis.
  4. Oligodontia.
  5. Frankel behavioral rating scale 1.
  6. Patients with special health care and medically compromised patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional Measurement
Using brass wire and digital caliper
Arch length
Frankel rating scale
Intermolar width
Intercanine width
Arch depth
Experimental: Digital Measurement
Intraoral scanning using CEREC Omnicam scanner and digital models will be obtained
Arch length
Frankel rating scale
Intermolar width
Intercanine width
Arch depth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective outcome
Time Frame: 2 months
Patient acceptance will be recorded according to Modified Facial scale modified from the Maunuksela et al scale showing the 3 schematic faces representing: (A) satisfaction; (B) indifference; and (C) dissatisfaction, respectively.
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
Time Frame: 2 months
arch width (inter canine and intermolar width) measured in mm
2 months
Patient acceptance
Time Frame: 2 months
Frankl's behavior rating scale will be re-evaluated after each method used. Score 1-4. score 1=definitely positive, score 2=positive,score 3=negative,score 4=definitely negative.
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
Time Frame: 2 months
Arch Length measured in mm
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
Time Frame: 2 months
Arch depth measured in mm
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 391/05-8-2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Arch Length Analysis

Clinical Trials on Dental arch length anlysis

Subscribe