Testing the Effectiveness of an Intervention That Aligns Circadian Rhythm With Daily Activities on Student Flourishing (Not Required)

February 12, 2026 updated by: Karen Dobkins, University of California, San Diego
Previous studies have examined whether circadian rhythm tracking improves well-being, with some evidence suggesting that aligning daily activities with one's natural chronotype (a person's natural preference for being alert and sleep), enhances well-being and productivity. However, the current research lacks intervention-based designs like real-time tracking or behavioral alignment tools. Here, the investigators aim to investigate if an active intervention, involving the usage of an app tracking circadian rhythms and making recommendations based on one's circadian rhythm over seven weeks, improves students' flourishing.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this clinical study is to test the effectiveness of an intervention (through an app called Owaves: MyBodyClock that will be provided free of cost) designed to help students align daily activities in accordance with their circadian rhythm. The questions include:

  1. Does the intervention improve both trait and state measures of student flourishing, including general well-being (i.e., happiness), focus, and energy levels?
  2. Does the intervention alter the types of activities participants engage in?
  3. Does the intervention impact the likelihood of seeking resources for physical and mental health?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Recruiting
        • UC San Diego
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently an undergraduate students from University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
  • Age 18 or older
  • has access to a device to answer Qualtrics questions
  • has access to a device that can download the MyBodyClock App (Apple iPhone or Apple iPad)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participants who are under the age of 18, are not undergraduate students at UCSD, or do not have access to the Qualtrics question platform and/or the MyBodyClock App

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group who uses OWAVES App for 7 weeks
Students use the Owaves app for 7 weeks and psychological measures are obatined pre and post to determine the effectiveness of the App
No Intervention: Control group who does not use the OWAVES app

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trait Happiness (Subjective Happiness Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) Trait questionnaire. The SHS is a 4-item scale of global subjective happiness. It is scored on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 = less happy to 7 = more happy. Total scores range from 4 to 28 where higher scores indicate greater subjective happiness.
Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
Focus Trait (Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale (Inattention Subscale) and Academic Time Management and Procrastination Measure)
Time Frame: Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
The Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale is a self-report questionnaire with 18-items which rates the frequency of ADHD symptoms and behaviors. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 = never or rarely, to 4 = very often. A lower score indicates less severe ADHD symptoms and behaviors.
Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
Energy Trait (Subjective Vitality Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) is a 6 - item self-report questionnaire to measure the subjective vitality of a participant. It is scored on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 = completely disagree to 7 = completely agree. Higher scores indicates higher level of subjective vitality.
Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
Mindfulness Trait (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ))
Time Frame: Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) short form is a 24-item questionnaire that measures mindfulness in participants. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = never/very rarely true to 5 = very often/always true. Higher scores indicate greater levels of mindfulness.
Baseline (Weeks 1/2) and Weeks 8/9.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
States
Time Frame: 7 weeks

State measures will be obtained within three days of the trait assessments (also in weeks 1/2 and 8/9) using the Daily Reconstruction Method (DRM), in which participants are asked to reconstruct their previous day into episodes and retrospectively report on state variables during each episode (see Raynes & Dobkins, 2025). The state measures will match the trait measures and ask about:

  • Happiness (State)
  • Focus (State)
  • Energy (State)
  • Mindfulness (State)
7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB: #813010

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronotypes and Health

Clinical Trials on Use of Owaves App

Subscribe