Patients With Pancreatic Tumor: Use of an App to Monitor Progress in a Simple and Intuitive Way by Periodically Completing Targeted Questionnaires and Providing Educational and Informational Content (PancreasPlus).

May 6, 2026 updated by: Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli

A Prospective Study on the Use of an App (PancreasPlus) for Home Monitoring and Proactive Management of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

Caring for people with pancreatic cancer requires good coordination between hospital care and care at home, with different healthcare professionals working closely together. Patients are also becoming more involved in managing their own care on a daily basis. However, this active involvement can be difficult if there is poor communication with healthcare teams, differences in skills or familiarity with digital tools, or systems that do not support patient participation.

The PancreasPlus app was developed to support patients and caregivers by providing reliable information, self-monitoring tools, and a communication channel with healthcare professionals. The study aims to assess the feasibility, patient engagement, and perceived quality of routine use of the app. It is hypothesized that its use will improve engagement, perceived quality, reduce anxiety and unplanned hospital visits, without introducing technological or privacy risks. The app supports information and data collection but does not replace clinical decision-making.

Objectives

Primary objectives:

Assess feasibility and patient engagement through questionnaire completion. Evaluate perceived service quality using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).

Secondary objectives:

Monitor unplanned hospital visits and adherence to chemotherapy. Assess anxiety (HADS-A), nutritional status, and global quality of life (PROMIS Global).

Evaluate usability and acceptability of the app (SUS, UTAUT2 short version).

Endpoints Primary endpoints include questionnaire completion rates and perceived quality (CSQ-8 score). Secondary endpoints include unplanned hospital access, chemotherapy adherence, anxiety levels, nutritional status, quality of life, and app usability/acceptability.

Methods This is a prospective, interventional, multicenter study with consecutive enrollment of eligible patients. Each participant will be followed for 3 months, with most activities conducted remotely via the app.

At baseline (T0), patients receive study information, provide consent, undergo training, register in the app, and complete initial assessments (clinical, socio-demographic, PROMIS Global, HADS-A). At 12 weeks (W12), follow-up includes all outcome questionnaires and data on unplanned hospital visits.

The app includes features such as a personal diary (symptoms, weight, BMI, appointments), interactive questionnaires with tailored feedback, and educational content on nutrition, prevention, emotional support, and patient rights.

Population Inclusion criteria: adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer, access to a smartphone/tablet (or caregiver support), ability to consent, and understanding of Italian. Exclusion criteria include severe cognitive impairment, inability to use the app or complete follow-up, or withdrawal of consent.

Sample Size and Analysis A total of 185 patients will be enrolled (accounting for 10% dropout), based on an expected 70% engagement rate. Analyses will be conducted on both intention-to-observe and per-protocol populations. Engagement will be analyzed as questionnaire completion rates, while other outcomes will be analyzed using appropriate statistical models (e.g., logistic regression, ANCOVA, descriptive statistics). An interim analysis at 50% enrollment is planned to address potential low engagement.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pavia
      • Pavia, Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Active, not recruiting
        • U.O. Chirurgia Generale 1, IRCCS San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia
    • Verona
      • Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy, 37019
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale P. Pederzoli Casa di Cura Privata S.p.A.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18; diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (histological/cytological)
  • Access to a smartphone or tablet and a data connection; basic digital literacy or a caregiver available,
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent; understanding of the Italian language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe uncompensated cognitive impairment,
  • Social or logistical circumstances that prevent follow-up or access to/use of the app,
  • Refusal or withdrawal of consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: PancreasPlus app

If the participant chooses to take part, they will be asked to use the PancreasPlus app for approximately 3 months. The app is designed to support the care pathway by helping track symptoms, weight, and other health aspects. At the beginning, the participant will receive instructions to download the app and create an account.

The participant will complete short questionnaires on physical and psychological wellbeing, including anxiety levels, quality of life, and satisfaction with the app. They will also access personalized content on symptom management, diet, treatments, and emotional support.

If the app detects warning signs, it will suggest contacting the healthcare team but will not make clinical decisions. All medical decisions remain the responsibility of the treating physicians. Reminder calls may be made during the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility and Engagement
Time Frame: 3 months
Feasibility and engagement will be assessed as a composite indicator of operational sustainability and active participation (co-production) in routine care. This will be operationalized as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the scheduled questionnaires at Week 12.
3 months
Consumer-Perceived Quality of Care (CSQ-8 Score)
Time Frame: 3 months
Consumer-perceived quality of care will be assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; total score range: 8-32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
App Usability (System Usability Scale - SUS)
Time Frame: 3 months

Usability will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Higher scores indicate greater usability. The System Usability Scale (SUS) produces a total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. These scores represent the percentile rank of a product's perceived usability, not a percentage, with an average score typically hovering around 68.

Minimum Value (0): Represents the lowest perceived usability. Maximum Value (100): Represents the highest perceived usability.

3 months
Global Quality of Life (PROMIS Global Health - Global Physical Health [GPH] and Global Mental Health [GMH] scores)
Time Frame: 3 months (Baseline (T0) to Week 12)
Change in global quality of life will be assessed using the PROMIS Global Health questionnaire (Global Physical Health [GPH] and Global Mental Health [GMH] scores). Outcome is defined as the change in scores from baseline (T0, start of app use) to Week 12. Global Physical and Global Mental Health subscales are computed separately and generally range from roughly 20 to 80 (T-score), where higher scores indicate better health.
3 months (Baseline (T0) to Week 12)
Anxiety (HADS-A Score)
Time Frame: 3 months (baseline (T0) to Week 12)
Change in anxiety levels will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale (HADS-A). Outcome is defined as the change in scores from baseline (T0) to Week 12. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) consists of 7 items, with total scores ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity, generally interpreted as 0-7 (Normal), 8-10 (Mild/Borderline), 11-14 (Moderate), and 15-21 (Severe).
3 months (baseline (T0) to Week 12)
Unscheduled Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
Number of unscheduled healthcare accesses, including emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and additional unplanned medical visits occurring during the study period.
From baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
Chemotherapy Adherence
Time Frame: From baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
Adherence to chemotherapy will be assessed in adjuvant, induction, or neoadjuvant settings, including timing relative to surgery (if applicable), number of cycles completed, dose modifications, and treatment interruptions due to adverse events.
From baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
Nutritional Status (Weight and Body Mass Index Monitoring)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
Nutritional status will be assessed through patient self-monitoring of body weight and calculation of Body Mass Index (BMI). Outcome includes changes in weight and BMI over time.
Baseline (T0) to 3 months (Week 12)
App Acceptability (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology -UTAUT2)
Time Frame: 3 months
Acceptability will be evaluated using the short version of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.The most common approach is a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Management

Clinical Trials on use of PancreasPlus app

Subscribe