Motivational Coaching to Enhance Mental Health Engagement in Rural Veterans (COACH)

August 26, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
The purpose of this study is to investigate health problems among rural Veterans. The research project also aims to test a new telephone-based approach for helping Veterans who need treatment connect with the appropriate care. This study will help us to better understand the kinds of problems Veterans experience. The study will also help us to find better ways to help Veterans get the help they may need.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Project Background: One in five Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)/Operation New Dawn (OND) Veterans resides in rural areas and primarily receives care from VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). Compared to their urban counterparts, rural Veterans experience a significantly greater MH burden and poorer outcomes. Nevertheless, less than 10% of OEF/OIF/OND Veterans with a new PTSD diagnosis attend a minimum number of sessions required for evidence-based treatment, with rurality being one of the strongest predictors of poor engagement. The investigators' pilot study in urban OEF/OIF/OND Veterans demonstrated that telephone Motivational Interviewing (MI) delivered by research staff significantly improved MH treatment initiation and retention in care. However, the investigators do not know whether telephone MI will have as strong an effect on MH treatment engagement when implemented by VA staff in CBOCs serving rural Veterans.

Project Objectives: As a part of the Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research (CeMOHR) CREATE application to improve rural Veterans' access to evidence-based mental healthcare, the overall goal of this project is to adapt, implement and test an MI-based coaching intervention to improve MH services engagement at CBOCs serving rural Veterans. The specific aims of this project are: (1) Conduct a developmental formative evaluation of perceived barriers to MH treatment engagement and adapt the MI-based treatment engagement intervention and implementation strategy to the needs of stakeholders; (2) Conduct a randomized multi-site pragmatic effectiveness trial comparing MH Referral alone with MH Referral plus MI-based coaching; and (3) Conduct an implementation-focused formative evaluation and use this information to make mid-course corrections to the implementation strategy based on stakeholder and key informant input.

Methods: The investigators will conduct the pragmatic effectiveness trial of the telephone motivational coaching intervention to determine whether, in comparison to MH Referral alone, telephone MI coaching improves MH treatment initiation and retention, the use of e-health MH resources, and perceived need and readiness for and access to MH treatment among rural Veterans who use CBOCs (Aim 2).

Impact: This research will help close the knowledge gap about barriers to care and preferences for MH services among rural Veterans. In addition, information from this project will be used to develop implementation toolkits for MH treatment engagement interventions for rural Veterans. Finally, this project will determine the effectiveness of a telephone Motivational Interviewing engagement intervention using e-health adjuncts, thereby filling a gap in the scientific literature about whether novel interventions can be used by VA staff in CBOCs to overcome rural-urban disparities in MH treatment engagement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

418

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72114-1706
        • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center, Little Rock, AR
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a Veteran over age 18
  • a resident of VISN 16 or 21 catchment areas receiving care at a CBOC with no plans to re-locate within 8 months of enrollment
  • positive for 1 or more of the following disorders: PTSD, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, high-risk drinking, and/or illicit substance use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hearing- impaired,
  • no working telephone,
  • Veterans with self-reported (and/or CPRS-confirmed) diagnoses of schizophrenia, psychosis or bipolar disorder, or active suicidality or homicidality
  • received mental health treatment within the last 60 days and/or has future appointments for mental health treatment in the next 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Coaching
Telephone based Motivational Coaching sessions
Telephone-based Motivational Interviewing aimed at getting Veterans to engage or retain mental health treatment
No Intervention: Referral alone
This is the current standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health (MH) Treatment Engagement
Time Frame: 26 months
Motivational Coaching (vs. Control) on MH treatment initiation. This will be measured by self-report and by checking the subjects medical record. The investigators will adjust by clustering for CBOC and region as well as potential confounding by other covariates
26 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health (MH) Treatment Retention
Time Frame: 26 months
Motivational Coaching (vs. Control) on MH treatment retention. This will be measured by self-report and by checking the subjects medical record. The investigators will adjust by clustering for CBOC and region as well as potential confounding by other covariates
26 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health Symptoms, Substance Use Scores and Quality of Life (QOL) Measures.
Time Frame: 26 months

Depression, anxiety, panic, PTSD, tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogen, opioid, and QOL domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.

Ranges of scores: depression: 0-27, anxiety: 0-4, panic: 0-4, PTSD: PTSD: 0-80., tobacco: 0-31, alcohol: 0-39, cannabis use: 0-39, cocaine: 0-39, amphetamine: 0-39, inhalants: 0-39, sedatives: 0-39, hallucinogen: 0-39, opioid: 0-39, QOL physical health: 4-20, QOL psychological health: 4-20, QOL social relationships: 4-20, QOL environment: 4-20.

Higher scores mean worse outcomes for mental health symptoms and substance use scores; higher scores mean worse outcomes for quality of life measures.

26 months
Self-care Activities
Time Frame: 26 months
Five types of self-care activities to relieve stress: internet or mobile applications, community groups (church groups, gun clubs), community classes (Yoga, cooking), alternative treatments (acupuncture, chiropractor, massage), and other self-care activities (meditation, fishing, walking).
26 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen H Seal, MD MPH, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRE 12-083

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on Motivational Coaching

Subscribe