Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein

April 23, 2026 updated by: Antonio Eduardo Zerati

Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein: Randomized Clinical Trial

This study compares two minimally invasive treatments for varicose veins in the legs, specifically the great saphenous vein.

Varicose veins can cause symptoms such as leg pain, swelling, and skin changes. One commonly used treatment is foam sclerotherapy, where a special foam is injected into the vein to close it. This method is simple and allows patients to return quickly to their daily activities, but sometimes the vein can reopen, requiring additional treatments.

Another option is mechanochemical ablation, which combines a small device with a medication to close the vein. This method also allows for quick recovery and may have a lower chance of the vein reopening.

In this study, 50 patients with varicose veins will be randomly assigned to receive one of these two treatments. Doctors will follow patients over time to evaluate:

How well the treated vein stays closed Improvement in quality of life Pain during the procedure Possible complications All procedures are performed with local anesthesia, and additional small varicose veins are treated at the same time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a widely used method for the treatment of lower limb varicose veins. Its main advantages include applicability in patients at high surgical risk and immediate or early return to daily activities. However, it requires a higher number of reinterventions compared to other techniques due to increased rates of venous recanalization, particularly in larger-caliber veins. In contrast, mechanochemical ablation shares these advantages and is associated with lower recanalization rates.

Objective:

To compare ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with mechanochemical ablation using the Flebogrif® catheter in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) associated with GSV disease. The primary endpoints will be quality of life assessment and GSV occlusion rate, as determined by lower limb venous color Doppler ultrasonography over the proposed follow-up period. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of treatment-related complications and pain level during the procedure.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 50 patients with primary varicose veins will be selected. Inclusion criteria include lower limb pain, edema, or skin changes such as hyperpigmentation, eczema, and lipodermatosclerosis (CEAP classification C2-C4, EpAsPr), as well as GSV insufficiency with a diameter between 6 and 12 mm measured at the mid-thigh using color Doppler ultrasonography. Clinical evaluations and ultrasound examinations will be conducted at the venous disease outpatient clinic, and procedures will be performed in the minor surgery operating room of the University of São Paulo Hospital.

This will be a prospective randomized study, with patients allocated into two groups according to the treatment technique.

Group 1: Percutaneous puncture and ultrasound-guided injection of sclerosant foam through a short 18G catheter.

Group 2: Use of the Flebogrif® catheter, positioned under ultrasound guidance 2 cm from the saphenofemoral junction, followed by catheter withdrawal combined with sclerosant foam injection.

In both groups, 20 mL of 0.9% saline solution will be infused prior to polidocanol administration. The GSV puncture site will depend on the extent of insufficiency (segmental or total), being performed at the knee or medial malleolar region, respectively, after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor and without infiltration along the venous course.

For knee-level puncture, a tourniquet will be applied distal to the access site and maintained for 5 minutes after foam injection to prevent dispersion into healthy venous segments.

In all patients, varicose tributaries will be treated immediately after the GSV procedure using 1% polidocanol sclerotherapy.

Expected Results:

Mechanochemical ablation is expected to demonstrate a higher target vein occlusion rate with lower recanalization rates, without increased procedural pain and with at least a comparable complication rate to ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. This study aims to contribute to the refinement of treatment strategies, seeking greater efficacy with monotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital da Clínicas da FMUSP
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio Zerati, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CEAP Classification C2, 3 or 4
  • Insufficient great saphenous vein measuring 6-12 mm in the mid-thigh on Doppler ultrasound.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to sclerosing substances
  • Deep venous thrombosis, stroke, or pulmonary embolism
  • Local or generalized infection at the sclerotherapy site
  • Prolonged immobilization
  • Asymptomatic patent foramen ovale
  • Pregnancy Occlusive peripheral arterial disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Great saphenous vein insufficiency (1)
25 limbs with great saphenous vein insufficiency
Mechanical-chemical ablation is a technique for treating varicose veins that combines mechanical damage to the venous endothelium with chemical damage using polidocanol foam.
Polidocanol foam is a drug infused into varicose veins, causing chemical damage to the endothelium.
Experimental: Great saphenous vein insufficiency (2)
25 limbs with great saphenous vein insufficiency
Mechanical-chemical ablation is a technique for treating varicose veins that combines mechanical damage to the venous endothelium with chemical damage using polidocanol foam.
Polidocanol foam is a drug infused into varicose veins, causing chemical damage to the endothelium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality Of Life Score: Brazilian Version Adapted from the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure
Brazilian Version Adapted from the Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire will be used. Score from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst quality of life related to varicose veins.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure
Disease Severity Score: Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) will be used. Score from 0 to 30, where 0 means asymptomatic patient and 30 means more symptomatic patient as possible.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure
Ultrasound Assessment: Classification of the Second European Consensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy Held in Tegernsee, Germany in 2006
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure
Classification of the Second European Consensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy Held in Tegernsee, Germany in 2006, will be used. Classification where 0 means reflux greater than 1 second, 1 means reflux less than 1 second, and 2 means no reflux.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 365 days after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment complications
Time Frame: One to 365 after procedure
Deep vein thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, visual disturbances, skin irritation and skin hyperpigmentation.
One to 365 after procedure
Pain Level During Procedure: Visual Analog Pain Scale
Time Frame: Pain level during the procedure
Visual Analog Pain Scale will be used. Scale where 0 means no pain and 10 means maximum pain during procedure.
Pain level during the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 83198024.0.0000.0068

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided. Maybe after publication.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Clinical Trials on Flebogrif

Subscribe