Hemorrhage Stroke Decision Making Model Based Deep Learning (BrainHemoAI System)

April 29, 2026 updated by: Xingen Zhu, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Construction of an Integrated Intelligent Model for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Based on Deep Learning

Although hemorrhagic stroke also has the characteristics of high mortality and disability rates, and constitutes a major public health problem worldwide, there is a relative lack of in-depth research teams for hemorrhagic stroke in China. The current preoperative imaging evaluation of spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage is still limited to the traditional Tada formula, and there are subjective differences in diagnosis among different doctors, making it difficult to achieve homogenization in clinical decision-making. Hemorrhagic stroke is a common and frequently occurring disease in Jiangxi Province. Therefore, establishing a new diagnosis and treatment system focused on hemorrhagic stroke can not only fill the research gap in this field in China, improve the accuracy and homogeneity of hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis and treatment, but also promote related research progress to reduce the mortality and disability rates of this disease and improve the clinical prognosis of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hemorrhagic stroke is a serious cerebrovascular disease, accounting for about 20% of all strokes. It refers to cerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by intracranial vascular diseases such as intracranial aneurysms, cerebral and spinal vascular malformations and moyamoya disease under the effect of blood flow. It has the characteristics of high incidence rate, high disability rate and high mortality rate, and has caused huge economic burden to patients, families and society.

Hemorrhagic stroke is one of the high-risk diseases in Jiangxi Province, and has become a major public health challenge and a key social issue that urgently needs to be addressed. On the one hand, the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhagic stroke have a certain degree of complexity, involving multiple disciplines, especially neurology and endocrinology, which have established multiple diagnostic, evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation systems. Different systems have different focuses, but limited by the level of understanding of the disease, there have been only basic treatment principles for decades, and there has been no breakthrough in specific treatment plans. On the other hand, with the development of the economy and the improvement of living standards, clinical physicians and patients not only focus on the survival rate after hemorrhagic stroke, but also pay more attention to neurological function recovery and long-term quality of life. Due to the limitations of detection technology in the past, it was difficult to accurately describe diseases and truly develop individualized diagnosis and treatment plans, resulting in significant differences in patient prognosis. How to leverage advances in diagnosis and treatment technology to ultimately achieve precision, individualization, and homogenization in the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhagic stroke is a key focus for the future.

Although hemorrhagic stroke also has the characteristics of high mortality and disability rates, and constitutes a major public health problem worldwide, there is a relative lack of in-depth research teams for hemorrhagic stroke in China. The current preoperative imaging evaluation of spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage is still limited to the traditional Tada formula, and there are subjective differences in diagnosis among different doctors, making it difficult to achieve homogenization in clinical decision-making. Hemorrhagic stroke is a common and frequently occurring disease in Jiangxi Province. Therefore, establishing a new diagnosis and treatment system focused on hemorrhagic stroke can not only fill the research gap in this field in China, improve the accuracy and homogeneity of hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis and treatment, but also promote related research progress to reduce the mortality and disability rates of this disease and improve the clinical prognosis of patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

7100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nanchang, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke, including parenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and subdural hemorrhage(including chronic subdural hemorrhage).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >= 8 years old;
  2. Patients diagnosed with spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke based on medical history and auxiliary examinations;
  3. Received non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in the outpatient or emergency department;
  4. Treated in accordance with standard clinical guidelines during hospitalization;
  5. Have complete clinical data.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had undergone surgical treatment in another hospital before admission;
  2. Was in a state of shock upon admission;
  3. Had severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction or other life-threatening systemic diseases;
  4. Died during hospitalization;
  5. Had an expected lifespan of less than six months or was unable to complete the study follow-up for other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under Curve
Time Frame: 90-day and 180-day
90-day and 180-day mRS score, survival status, functional independence (Barthel index).
90-day and 180-day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity ,Specificity,True Positive Rate,False Positive Rate
Time Frame: Baseline (admission), 24 hours postoperatively, 3 days postoperatively, 7 days postoperatively, discharge, 90-day follow-up, 180-day follow-up
Including hospital stay, ICU stay, hospitalization costs, rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia, intracranial infection, and hydrocephalus flow surgery needs
Baseline (admission), 24 hours postoperatively, 3 days postoperatively, 7 days postoperatively, discharge, 90-day follow-up, 180-day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhage Stroke

Clinical Trials on Large language model

Subscribe