Efficacy of Combining Mulligan Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement and Mechanical Lumbar Traction in Lumbar Radiculopathy

May 1, 2026 updated by: Khyber Medical University Peshawar

Efficacy of Combining Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Technique and Mechanical Lumbar Traction Among Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lumbar radiculopathy (LR), often caused by disc herniation, results in significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is a manual technique that has shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction is used to reduce nerve compression, though its standalone effectiveness is debated. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the combined effect of SMWLM plus mechanical lumbar traction against SMWLM alone, both administered with conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes will be assessed over 4 weeks to determine if the combined intervention offers superior pain relief, functional improvement, and range of motion in patients with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar radiculopathy, commonly arising from disc herniation and nerve root compression, causes disabling leg pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Manual techniques such as Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) have shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction aims to decrease nerve compression, though its added benefit remains uncertain. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether the combination of SMWLM and mechanical lumbar traction, delivered alongside conventional physiotherapy, yields superior clinical outcomes compared to SMWLM and conventional therapy alone. The study will be conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan, enrolling 32 adults aged 20-50 years with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy (confirmed by MRI, symptom duration 4 weeks-6 months, positive Straight Leg Raise below 70°, and pain <7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group (SMWLM + intermittent mechanical lumbar traction at 50% body weight + conventional therapy) or the control group (SMWLM + conventional therapy alone).

The intervention will be applied over four weeks (three sessions weekly for the first two weeks, then two sessions weekly). SMWLM involves a sustained transverse glide to the spinous process of the superior vertebra while the patient actively performs pain-free leg movement. Mechanical traction will be applied intermittently (30-second hold, 10-second rest) for 15 minutes per session. Conventional therapy includes hot pack, TENS, and a standardized exercise program. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), hip range of motion during Straight Leg Raise (universal goniometer), and functional disability (Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire) will be measured at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Data will be analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and independent t-tests to assess between-group differences. This trial will provide evidence on whether combining mechanical traction with SMWLM enhances pain relief, mobility, and function in lumbar radiculopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 20-50 years
  • Male and female participants
  • Unilateral radiculopathy due to L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc bulge, confirmed by clinical examination and MRI
  • Symptom duration of 4 weeks to 6 months
  • Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test on the affected leg (<70° of hip flexion)
  • Pain intensity <7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; mild to moderate pain)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment, dementia, central cord signs
  • Inflammatory or degenerative spine conditions
  • Spine surgery within the last 6 months
  • Pregnant women in the later half of 2nd trimester or 3rd trimester
  • Muscular involvement (e.g., Deep Gluteal syndrome, Piriformis syndrome)
  • Currently receiving medications or other contemporaneous treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy
Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), mechanical lumbar traction, and conventional physiotherapy.
The therapist positions the patient side-lying on the unaffected side with the affected leg slightly abducted. A sustained transverse manual glide is applied to the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved lumbar segment (e.g., L4 for an L4-L5 lesion). Simultaneously, the patient actively lifts the leg into hip flexion and knee extension, ensuring the movement remains pain-free. Dosage: 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions per treatment session.
Other Names:
  • Mulligan mobilization, SMWLM, spinal mobilization with limb movement
Following SMWLM, the patient is placed supine in a Fowler position with hips and knees flexed to 90°, lower legs supported. An intermittent distractive force (up to 50% of body weight) is delivered using an automatic traction device (e.g., PH-T3021). The traction cycle consists of a 30-second hold and a 10-second rest, with a 1-minute ramp-up and ramp-down, for a total of 15 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Intermittent lumbar traction, automatic traction therapy

All participants receive a standardized conventional therapy program consisting of:

  • Moist hot pack on the lumbar region for 10 minutes.
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with 50-100 ms pulse width for 10 minutes, electrodes placed over the lumbar spine and affected lower limb.
  • Supervised therapeutic exercises: heel sitting (lumbar flexion), drawing-in maneuver, bridging, and pelvic tilting (2 sets of 5-7 repetitions per session).
  • Home exercise program: same exercises performed daily, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with progression as tolerated.
Other Names:
  • Standard physiotherapy, hot pack and TENS, therapeutic exercise
Active Comparator: SMWLM + Conventional Therapy
Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) and conventional physiotherapy without mechanical traction.
The therapist positions the patient side-lying on the unaffected side with the affected leg slightly abducted. A sustained transverse manual glide is applied to the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved lumbar segment (e.g., L4 for an L4-L5 lesion). Simultaneously, the patient actively lifts the leg into hip flexion and knee extension, ensuring the movement remains pain-free. Dosage: 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions per treatment session.
Other Names:
  • Mulligan mobilization, SMWLM, spinal mobilization with limb movement

All participants receive a standardized conventional therapy program consisting of:

  • Moist hot pack on the lumbar region for 10 minutes.
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with 50-100 ms pulse width for 10 minutes, electrodes placed over the lumbar spine and affected lower limb.
  • Supervised therapeutic exercises: heel sitting (lumbar flexion), drawing-in maneuver, bridging, and pelvic tilting (2 sets of 5-7 repetitions per session).
  • Home exercise program: same exercises performed daily, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with progression as tolerated.
Other Names:
  • Standard physiotherapy, hot pack and TENS, therapeutic exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)
The average pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) over the previous 24 hours is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The patient is asked to provide current, best, and worst pain ratings; the mean of the three ratings will be used.
Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)
Functional Disability
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MOLBPQ) is a validated 10-item questionnaire measuring how much low back pain has affected daily activities (e.g., walking, sitting, lifting, sleeping). Each item scores 0-5; total sum is expressed as a percentage (0-50). Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Hip Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test is a pain-free hip flexion angle (in degrees) measured with a universal goniometer during the passive straight leg raise test. The examiner stops the movement at the point where the patient first reports concordant radicular pain or tightness. Standardized goniometer placement relative to the femur ensures consistency.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Haris, DPT, Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad
  • Principal Investigator: Dr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT, Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad
  • Principal Investigator: Kinza Afzal, DPT, Hamdard University Islamabad Campus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in published articles will be shared. This includes the demographic data, baseline characteristics, and all primary outcome measures (NPRS pain scores, Straight Leg Raise goniometry angles, and Modified Oswestry Disability scores) at the three assessment time points. The shared data will be accompanied by a data dictionary explaining all variable names and values.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for 2 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator, Dr. Muhammad Haris, at drm.harispt@gmail.com. To gain access, data requestors must sign a data access agreement that includes commitments to use the data only for the specified research purpose, to maintain appropriate data security, and not to attempt to re-identify participants. A review of the proposal by the study team is required prior to approval.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)

Subscribe