Effectiveness of Tele-Rehabilitation in Managing Rhomboid Trigger Points in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome

April 30, 2026 updated by: Riphah International University
This randomized controlled trial aims to assess the effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation, including self-myofascial release and exercise therapy, in reducing pain, improving functional range of motion, and decreasing neck disability in patients with rhomboid trigger points associated with myofascial pain syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rhomboid myofascial pain syndrome is a common yet often underreported musculoskeletal condition characterized by the presence of myofascial trigger points within the rhomboid muscles. These trigger points produce localized and referred pain, reduced range of motion, and functional limitations that can significantly affect daily activities. The condition is strongly associated with poor posture, prolonged sitting, and repetitive upper limb activities, particularly among individuals with sedentary lifestyles and high occupational demands. Evidence indicates a high prevalence of rhomboid trigger points, with many individuals experiencing moderate pain that interferes with their routine work and overall quality of life.

Biomechanically, sustained postural stress such as forward head posture and rounded shoulders increases the load on scapular stabilizing muscles, leading to muscle fatigue, microtrauma, and the development of trigger points. These changes contribute to altered scapular kinematics, muscle imbalance, and restricted movement. Self-myofascial release techniques have been shown to reduce pain sensitivity, improve circulation, and restore muscle function, making them an effective approach for managing myofascial pain.

Tele-rehabilitation has emerged as a practical and accessible method for delivering physiotherapy interventions remotely, allowing patients to perform guided exercises and self-myofascial release without the need for frequent in-person visits. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with busy schedules or limited access to healthcare services.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation, incorporating self-myofascial release and exercise therapy, in reducing pain intensity, improving functional range of motion, and decreasing neck disability in patients with rhomboid trigger points associated with myofascial pain syndrome. The study also seeks to determine the feasibility of tele-rehabilitation as a convenient and sustainable alternative to conventional physiotherapy for managing rhomboid-related musculoskeletal pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
        • JPMC
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Rameeqa Aamir, MSOMPT*
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rameeqa Aamir, MSOMPT*

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants falling in this category would be recruited into the study.

    • Age 18-35 years
    • Both Genders: Male and Female
    • Paitents experiencing Neck and upper back pain due to active trigger points.(16) According to Travell and Simons (1999)criteria, active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are identified.
    • NPRS ≥4
    • Presence of maximum one or more than one MTrPs in the Romboids muscle.
    • Prolong sitting at least 6 hours per day.
    • Access to a device with internet connection ( for tele rehabilitation group).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants falling in this category would be excluded from the study.

    • Participants fall in this category would be excluded of the study.
    • Patients currently taking analgesics (painkillers) or muscle relaxants.
    • Any inflammatory pathology, neurological impairment, and cervical tumor.
    • Other deformities such as scoliosis or torticollis.
    • Spinal Injuries and any other co morbidity.
    • Any surgery, trauma, fracture and fall.
    • Pregnancy.
    • Patient unwilling to comply follow up schedule.
    • Patient involvement in another interventional study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tele-rehabilitation (Exercise Therapy + Self-Myofascial Release)
  1. Self-Myofascial Release: Using a tennis ball against the wall targeting rhomboid region (5 mintues in total).
  2. Stretching Exercises: Upper trapezius and levator scapulae stretch (30 seconds hold × 5 repetitions).
  3. Postural correction Exercises: cervical retraction and shoulder blade squeezing /retraction ( 5 repetitions).
  4. Postural and ergonomic education .
  5. Mode of Delivery: Live/video-guided tele-rehabilitation sessions.
  1. Self-Myofascial Release: Using a tennis ball against the wall targeting rhomboid region (5 mintues in total).
  2. Stretching Exercises: Upper trapezius and levator scapulae stretch (30 seconds hold × 5 repetitions).
  3. Postural correction Exercises: cervical retraction and shoulder blade squeezing /retraction ( 5 repetitions).
  4. Postural and ergonomic education .
  5. Mode of Delivery: Live/video-guided tele-rehabilitation sessions.
Other: Conventional Myofascial Release Treatment
  1. Manual Myofascial Release: Therapist performe myofascial release on rhomboid trigger points.( 5 mintues in total)
  2. Stretching Exercises: Upper trapezius and levator scapulae stretch (30 seconds hold × 5 repetitions).
  3. Postural correction Exercises: cervical retraction and shoulder blade squeezing /retraction ( 5 repetitions).
  4. Postural and ergonomic education .
  5. Mode of Delivery: In hospital treatment.
  1. Manual Myofascial Release: Therapist performe myofascial release on rhomboid trigger points.( 5 mintues in total)
  2. Stretching Exercises: Upper trapezius and levator scapulae stretch (30 seconds hold × 5 repetitions).
  3. Postural correction Exercises: cervical retraction and shoulder blade squeezing /retraction ( 5 repetitions).
  4. Postural and ergonomic education .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inclinometer for functional range of motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks
An inclinometer is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure cervical range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion. It provides objective and reproducible angular measurements of spinal movement. Studies have reported excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.85-0.98) for cervical motion assessment using a dual inclinometer.
2 weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a simple, reliable, and valid tool used to assess pain intensity. It consists of an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10.The NPRS shows strong construct and concurrent validity when compared with other established pain assessment tools.The NPRS has demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (r = 0.95) is across various musculoskeletal and rehabilitation populations
2 weeks
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a standardized questionnaire used to assess the impact of neck pain on daily activities. It consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The NDI has shown excellent reliability (ICC = 0.89-0.94) and strong validity for evaluating functional limitations in patients with neck and upper back pain.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria khalid, MSOMPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Tele-rehabilitation (ET + Self-Myofascial Release)

Subscribe