Imaging Metabolic and Perfusion Changes in Acupuncture Therapy for Myofascial Pain Syndrome (IMPACT-MPS)

March 19, 2026 updated by: University of California, Davis

IMPACT-MPS: Imaging Metabolic and Perfusion Changes in Acupuncture Therapy for Myofascial Pain Syndrome

This study will evaluate the clinical and biological effects of acupuncture for chronic low back pain associated with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).

In this randomized, participant- and assessor-blinded clinical trial, 64 adults with chronic low back pain due to MPS will be assigned to receive either true acupuncture or sham acupuncture for eight weeks. Participants will undergo total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) imaging and complete standardized pain and functional questionnaires at baseline and after treatment.

The study will evaluate whether acupuncture improves pain and function compared with sham treatment and whether TB-PET/CT imaging can detect changes in myofascial tissue metabolism and perfusion that correspond with clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a musculoskeletal pain disorder characterized by localized muscle pain, trigger points, and functional limitations. MPS is frequently associated with chronic low back pain and contributes substantially to reduced quality of life and increased healthcare utilization. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis and treatment monitoring rely largely on subjective clinical examination and patient-reported outcomes because validated objective biomarkers of myofascial tissue dysfunction are lacking.

Acupuncture is widely used as a non-pharmacologic treatment for chronic pain and has demonstrated benefit in several chronic low back pain studies. However, the biological mechanisms underlying acupuncture's therapeutic effects remain poorly understood, in part because objective measures of tissue-level response are limited.

Total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) is a highly sensitive molecular imaging technique capable of assessing metabolic activity and blood flow throughout the body. Recent observational work using TB-PET/CT has demonstrated the ability to differentiate painful myofascial tissue from non-painful tissue, suggesting that this technology may provide quantitative biomarkers of myofascial dysfunction.

The IMPACT-MPS study is a two-arm, randomized, participant- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate both the clinical efficacy of acupuncture and the utility of TB-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in MPS. A total of 64 adults with chronic low back pain associated with myofascial pain syndrome will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standardized acupuncture treatment or sham acupuncture.

Participants will receive up to three acupuncture or sham sessions per week for eight weeks. TB-PET/CT imaging and patient-reported outcome assessments will be performed at baseline and at 8 weeks, with an optional imaging and assessment visit at week 4. Clinical outcomes will include standardized pain and function measures, including the PEG (Pain intensity, Enjoyment of life, General activity) scale and other NIH HEAL Common Data Elements.

The primary clinical endpoint is the change in PEG score from baseline to 8 weeks. The primary imaging endpoint is the change in standardized uptake values in predefined myofascial regions of interest measured by TB-PET/CT. Secondary outcomes include additional patient-reported outcomes and imaging measures of myofascial tissue metabolism and perfusion.

This study aims to determine whether acupuncture improves clinical outcomes in patients with myofascial pain syndrome and to evaluate TB-PET/CT as an objective imaging biomarker of myofascial tissue dysfunction and treatment response. The results may support the development of imaging-based tools for evaluating chronic musculoskeletal pain and monitoring treatment effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • UC Davis EXPLORER Molecular Imaging Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Abhijit J Chaudhari, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to understand the purposes and risks of the trial and willingness to sign an informed consent form
  • Willingness and ability to comply with all protocol required procedures
  • Willingness to be randomized to receive either true acupuncture or sham acupuncture
  • Current self-report of chronic low back pain (cLBP) which has persisted for the past 3 months AND has resulted in pain on > 50% of days in the past 6 months
  • At least one palpable nodule or taut band in paraspinal, quadratus lumborum, or gluteal muscles
  • Reproduction of the patient's dominant pain with palpation of a muscle nodule or taut band
  • Predominantly paramedian pain (may be uni-lateral or bi-lateral)
  • Willing and able to lay motionless in a supine position at least twice, preferably thrice: 70-minute TB-PET/CT scan
  • Willing and able to fast for at least 6 hours before and for the duration of the TB-PET/CT scan
  • Willing to avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours before the TB-PET/CT scan visit
  • Willingness to practice effective contraception during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No Primary Care Physician
  • History of spine infection (discitis or osteomyelitis) or spine tumor
  • History of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, psoriatic arthritis, or lupus
  • Confounding conditions that are known to be responsible for inducing pain
  • Implants at or in the region of the sites of interest
  • Diagnosis of any vertebral fracture in the last 6 months
  • Cauda equina syndrome or lumbar radiculopathy with functional motor deficit (strength<4/5 on manual motor testing)
  • Spinal implants (including fixation hardware, spinal cord stimulator, intra-thecal pumps, that are present in the region of the sites of interest)
  • Predominantly central pain
  • Pain below the knee
  • Positive straight leg raise test
  • Symptomatic hip arthritis
  • Uncontrolled claustrophobia
  • Pregnant or lactating participants
  • Body weight more than 225 kg (496 pounds) due to the weight limitation of the scanner bed
  • Prisoners
  • Inability to speak, read, and write in the English language
  • Concurrent or prior enrollment in a separate research study involving a PET scan performed within the last 12 months for research purposes only.

That is, PET scans are not performed as part of a patient's treatment plan (e.g. standard of care, therapeutic purposes, or clinical care) and the research study did not intend to provide therapeutic benefit to the patient.

•Any other criteria, which would make the participant unsuitable to participate in this study as determined by the Principal Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Acupuncture
Participants randomized to the experimental arm will receive standardized acupuncture treatment up to three sessions per week for eight weeks (maximum of 24 sessions) administered by a licensed acupuncturist.
Participants assigned to the acupuncture group will receive standardized acupuncture treatments administered by a licensed acupuncturist. Treatments will occur up to three times per week for eight weeks (maximum of 24 sessions).
Participants will undergo total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) imaging using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). Imaging will be performed at baseline (prior to the first acupuncture/sham acupuncture) and at 8 weeks (after the last acupuncture/sham acupuncture session), with an optional mid-treatment scan at 4 weeks, to evaluate metabolic activity and perfusion in myofascial tissue.
Sham Comparator: Sham Acupuncture
Participants randomized to the control arm will receive sham acupuncture using non-penetrating needles designed to mimic acupuncture procedures without therapeutic needle penetration.
Participants will undergo total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) imaging using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). Imaging will be performed at baseline (prior to the first acupuncture/sham acupuncture) and at 8 weeks (after the last acupuncture/sham acupuncture session), with an optional mid-treatment scan at 4 weeks, to evaluate metabolic activity and perfusion in myofascial tissue.
Participants assigned to the sham control group will receive sham acupuncture using non-penetrating placebo needles designed to mimic the appearance and sensation of acupuncture without skin penetration. Sessions will occur up to three times per week for eight weeks (maximum of 24 sessions) and will follow procedures similar in duration and setting to the acupuncture intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PEG score from Baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in PEG (Pain intensity, Enjoyment of life, General activity) score from baseline to 8 weeks. The PEG is a 3-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain intensity and pain interference with enjoyment of life and general activity. Higher scores indicate worse pain severity and interference. This is the primary clinical endpoint.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Standardized Uptake Values in Myofascial Regions of Interest on TB-PET/CT from Baseline to 8 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in standardized uptake values (SUV) in predefined myofascial regions of interest as measured by total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) from baseline to 8 weeks. This is the primary imaging endpoint.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in PET-Derived K1 Perfusion (mL/min/g) Averaged Across Predefined Myofascial Regions of Interest
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
K1 perfusion parameter (mL/min/g), representing tracer delivery and tissue blood flow, will be quantified using total-body PET/CT in predefined myofascial regions of interest (ROIs). For each participant, K1 values will be calculated for each ROI and averaged across all predefined ROIs to generate a single summary value per timepoint. The outcome measure is the percent change in mean K1 from baseline to 8 weeks post-intervention.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 6a T-Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Sleep Disturbance Short Form 6a will be used to assess sleep disturbance. Responses are converted to a standardized T-score (range 0-100), where higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance. The outcome measure is the change in T-score from baseline to 8 weeks post-intervention.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Short Form 6 Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale Short Form 6 score from baseline to 8 weeks. Scores range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Patient Global Impression of Change at 8 Weeks
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-intervention
Participant-reported Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 8 weeks following treatment. Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating worsening.
8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) score from baseline to 8 weeks. The PHQ-2 assesses depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2) score from baseline to 8 weeks. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in TAPS-1 Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Change in Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medications, and other Substances (TAPS-1) screening score from baseline to 8 weeks. This is a 4-item screen for tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs, and non-medical use of prescription drugs, askign about frequency of use with higher scores indicating increased risk for substance use disorder.
Baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abhijit J Chaudhari, PhD, University of California, Davis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture

Subscribe