Low-Energy Ultrasound, Electrical and Magnetic Field Stimulation in Therapy-Resistant Myofascial Pain Syndrome

April 21, 2026 updated by: Sobet AG

A Combination of Low-Energy Ultrasound, Electrical and Magnetic Field Stimulation in Patients With Therapy-Resistant Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Multi-Center Study

Sonodyn is an investigational device that within this clinical investigation is intended for use in patients suffering from low back pain, tension headache or neck pain, originating from therapy-resistant myofascial pain syndrome.

Myofascial pain syndrome is a prevalent pain condition in the adult population and a common cause of pain and dysfunction in the musculoskeletal system. It is a trigger point-induced regional musculoskeletal pain disorder affecting one or more muscles or groups of muscles.

Sonodyn is a handheld medical device that combines low-energy ultrasound, electrical and magnetic field stimulation for non-invasive transcutaneous treatment of chronic myofascial pain syndrome. Sonodyn is a battery-operated, rechargeable stimulation device to be placed over specific trigger points for associated pain patterns in the human body. It emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources.

The study will follow a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind parallel group design. It will be conducted as a multi-center investigation at 6 sites in Austria and Switzerland. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 ratio into Treatment and Control.

  • Active Sonodyn therapy (Treatment)
  • No therapy (Sham Control)

Two types of Sonodyn devices will be used: a fully functional one for Therapy arm patients that can deliver stimulation, and a non-functional one for Control arm patients that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output. The devices will look fully identical.

Randomization will be stratified by study site, pain diagnosis and sex of the patient.

For each subject, after a screening phase of 1 week, patients will be treated for 3 weeks with a follow-up of additional 8 weeks, adding up to 12 weeks. During treatment patients will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each.

During screening, treatment and follow-up period, all patients will twice per day report the average and maximum intensity of their pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients will also enter the date, amount, and time of intake of rescue medication, if applicable.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact on pain. Secondary objectives are to compare the performance between active therapy and sham, as well as to correlate changes in pain intensity with other pain related scales.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8020
        • Recruiting
        • Schmerzambulanz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Graz
        • Contact:
          • Michael Kern, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Kern, Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julia Kolb, Dr.
      • Klagenfurt, Austria, 9020
        • Recruiting
        • Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
        • Contact:
          • Rudolf Likar, Prof. Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rudolf Likar, Prof. Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Stefan Neuwersch-Sommeregger, Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Markus Köstenberger, Dr.
      • Zams, Austria, 6511
        • Recruiting
        • Krankenhaus St. Vinzenz Zams
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Wolf, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andreas Wolf, Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christian Wolf, Dr.
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3013
        • Recruiting
        • RSB Neurochirurgie AG, Salem-Spital Bern
        • Contact:
          • Ralph Binggeli, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ralph Binggeli, Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bernhard Voller, Prof. Dr.
      • Meyrin, Switzerland, 1217
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique de la Douleur, La Tour Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Blaise Rutschmann, Dr.
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8050
        • Recruiting
        • Schmerzklinik Zürich AG
        • Contact:
          • Michael Hartmann, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Hartmann, Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tomislav Kovacevic, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 to 99 years at screening
  • Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures
  • Patient is suffering from one of the following chronic pain conditions originating from myofascial pain:

    • low back pain
    • tension headache
    • neck pain

having been persisting for a minimum of 3 months and where myofascial pain syndrome is the pre-dominant cause for pain.

  • Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment for 1 week during the screening phase
  • A daily average NRS >= 4 on 4 out of 7 days in the screening phase
  • Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active implants
  • Allergy against rescue medication used during the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Mental or physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device
  • Patients with cerebral spams (epilepsy)
  • Patients with psychiatric diseases or somatoform pain disorders
  • Patients with oral morphine equivalent of more than 120mg daily dose
  • Patients taking centrally acting muscle relaxants like Sirdalud or benzodiacepines
  • Patients with a contraindication against NSAID's
  • Presence of artificial joints made from methylmethacrylate or polyethylene at stimulation site
  • Presence of ferromagnetic metal implants at stimulation site, especially aneurysm clips, dental implants, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Sonodyn Therapy (Treatment Group)
Patients will remain on treatment for 3 weeks and will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each.
Sonodyn emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined, fixed set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources.
Sham Comparator: Sham Therapy (Control Group)
Patients will remain on sham treatment for 3 weeks and will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each.
Non-functional Sonodyn device that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output, however, looks and behaves fully identical as the active Sonodyn device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Change in Treatment group from Baseline to EoT in average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain that the patient had ever experienced) per day
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in average NRS between groups - Baseline to EoT
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Difference between groups in change of average NRS from Baseline to EoT
3 weeks
Maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Change from Baseline to EoT in maximum NRS in both groups
3 weeks
Average and maximum NRS - Baseline to end of follow-up
Time Frame: 11 weeks
Change from Baseline to end of follow-up in average and maximum NRS in both groups
11 weeks
AUC of average and maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Baseline-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of average and maximum NRS from Baseline to EoT in both groups
3 weeks
Average and maximum NRS - Follow-up
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Average and maximum NRS during follow-up in both groups
8 weeks
Medication consumption
Time Frame: 11 weeks
Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase in both groups
11 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 11 weeks
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire from Baseline to EoT and end of follow-up
11 weeks
Quality of sleep
Time Frame: 11 weeks
Quality of sleep questionnaire from Baseline to EoT and end of follow-up
11 weeks
Socioeconomic data
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Change in socioeconomic data from Screening to EoT
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcome #1
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Device Effects (ADEs), and Device Deficiencies (DDs) observed until EoT
3 weeks
Safety Outcome #2
Time Frame: 11 weeks
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), and related AEs observed until end of follow-up
11 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rudolf Likar, Prof. Dr., Klinikum Klagenfurt am Worthersee

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Lower Back

Clinical Trials on Active Sonodyn

Subscribe