Hearing Outcomes With the Nucleus® 8 Sound Processor and Nucleus® 7 Sound Processor in Adult Veteran and Non-veteran Cochlear Implant Recipients (SALUTE)

May 6, 2026 updated by: Cochlear

A Post-market Interventional, Prospective, Open-label, Multi-center, Clinical Investigation of Hearing Outcomes With the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor and Nucleus 7 Sound Processor in Adult Veteran and Non-veteran Cochlear Implant Recipients

The main purpose of this study is to understand how well a noise reduction feature called ForwardFocus works when used with two different sound processors: the Nucleus® 8 Sound Processor and the Nucleus® 7 Sound Processor, in adults with cochlear implants.

The study will include two groups of adult cochlear implant recipients: veterans and non-veterans. Comparing these groups will help researchers understand how these sound processors perform in veteran populations as well as the broader adult cochlear implant community.

Participants will use each sound processor and then take part in speech understanding tests in background noise. They will also complete questionnaires about their listening experiences with each processor.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Lone Tree, Colorado, United States, 80124
        • Denver Research and Technology Lab
        • Contact:
          • PRS Specialist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 years or older, at time of consent.
  2. Implanted with the CI600 Series (CI612, CI632, CI622, CI624), CI500 Series (CI512, CI532, CI522) or Freedom Series (CI24R(CA), CI24R(ST) CI24R(CS), CI24M, CI24RE(CA), CI24RE(ST), CI422) in the test ear.
  3. At least 18 active electrodes in the test ear.
  4. At least 6 months experience with a cochlear implant in the test ear.
  5. Able to score 20% or more at +10 dB SNR with CI alone on an S0N0 sentence in-noise test in the test ear.
  6. Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
  7. Candidate is a fluent speaker in the language used to assess speech perception performance.
  8. Direct access to a compatible smartphone.
  9. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recipients with single-sided deafness as determined by the Investigator.
  2. Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations.
  3. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedures.
  4. Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
  5. Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families; immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
  6. Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organizations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
  7. Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device (unless Cochlear sponsored and determined by Investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Veterans
While the user can turn ForwardFocus on from any program in the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor, for the duration of this study, SCAN will be used as the default program and ForwardFocus will be turned on for testing. This setting will be referred to as SCAN ForwardFocus (SCAN FF).
Nucleus 8 Sound Processor will be used with the SCAN 2 ForwardFocus (SCAN 2 FF) program to evaluate speech performance.
Experimental: Non-veterans
While the user can turn ForwardFocus on from any program in the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor, for the duration of this study, SCAN will be used as the default program and ForwardFocus will be turned on for testing. This setting will be referred to as SCAN ForwardFocus (SCAN FF).
Nucleus 8 Sound Processor will be used with the SCAN 2 ForwardFocus (SCAN 2 FF) program to evaluate speech performance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paired difference in AzBio percent correct in noise between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio in the S0N90 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paired difference in AzBio percent correct in noise between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio in the S90N180 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4
Paired difference in AzBio percent correct in noise between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio in the S0N180 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4
Paired difference in AzBio improvement (percentage-point change) for the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor (SCAN 2 FF minus SCAN 2) compared to the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor (SCAN FF minus SCAN) in the S0N180 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4
Paired difference in CNC percent correct in quiet between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program in the S0 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word test will be used to assess speech perception of words in quiet. The test consists of 10 recorded lists of 50 monosyllabic words, produced by a male talker.
Week 2 and week 4
Paired difference in AzBio percent correct in quiet between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program in the S0 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4
Paired difference in AzBio percent correct in noise between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor using the SCAN 2 FF program and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor using the SCAN FF program at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio in the S0N0 spatial configuration
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 4
The AzBio sentence test is a validated test used to assess open-set sentence recognition. AzBio sentences are spoken in a conversational style with limited contextual cues that the listener can use to predict unintelligible words.
Week 2 and week 4
Proportion of participants preferring each sound processor in various listening domains
Time Frame: Week 4
The Device Preference Questionnaire is a custom self-assessment to evaluate participants' preference between the Nucleus 8 and Nucleus 7 Sound Processors, or "no preference".
Week 4
Mean difference in SSQ-12 total scores between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 4
The SSQ-12 is a validated 12-item abbreviated form of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale that measures self-reported hearing ability across speech, spatial, and sound quality domains, with each item rated from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent). Total scores are calculated by averaging responses across relevant items.
Week 2 and Week 4
Mean difference in VFS-A-10 total scores between the Nucleus 8 Sound Processor and the Nucleus 7 Sound Processor
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 4
The Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale-10-Item Adult (VFS-A-10) is a validated 10-item subjective scale designed to assess listening-related fatigue in adults with hearing loss. The scale provides a total score based on all 10 questions rated on a Likert scale from 0 (no listening-related fatigue) to 4 (severe listening-related fatigue).
Week 2 and Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Cochlear do not have an approved platform for public sharing of IPD collected in this study. Data may be provided to individual researchers on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Nucleus 7 Sound Processor

Subscribe