Wide Diameter Bone Anchored Implant Study

April 3, 2018 updated by: Oticon Medical

A Clinical Study of the Oticon Medical Ponto 4.5mm Wide Implant

To assess implant stability, implant loss, adverse skin reactions, and Quality of Life Benefit following implantation of the Ponto 4.5mm Wide Diameter implant. Secondary: to determine the feasibility of fitting the sound processor 3 weeks after surgical implantation, and to investigate if the type of skin reactions following implantation could be related to the demographic data of subjects and the type of surgical technique used

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bone-anchored hearing systems have been an amplification choice for conductive, mixed, and profound, unilateral, sensorineural hearing loss for over three decades. So far, about 75,000 patients worldwide have received this surgical intervention (bone-anchored hearing system), since its first successful implantation in 1977. In 2009, Oticon Medical, LLC launched its bone-anchored hearing system called Ponto. In just over two years, the Ponto has been successfully implanted in over 3,000 patients by leading otolaryngologists and neurotologists in 18 countries worldwide.

The Ponto implant has previously been available with a 3.75mm diameter and comes in two lengths: 3mm and 4mm. Anew Ponto implant that is 4.5mm wide in diameter is now available in both 3mm and 4mm lengths. This Wide Diameter implant is designed to maximize bone-to-implant contact area and enhance implant stability which can potentially allow loading of the sound processor as early as 3 weeks after surgery. The abutment screw incorporates external threads at the screw head to make it possible to connect a SmartPeg (Osstell, Goteborg, Sweden) for stability measurements. All Ponto implants have the same universal implant-abutment interface. Therefore, they are fully compatible with existing instruments and abutments. Two new countersinks have been developed for the new Ponto Wide Diameter implant. The drill size of the countersink is 3.80mm. It is marked with a "W" to separate them from existing drills. All products are CE-marked and cleared for the US market by the FDA.

Objectives The present study will attempt to show that the Ponto 4.5mm Wide Diameter implant has similar or better outcomes in terms of Quality of Life (QoL) benefit; implant extrusion and revision surgery when compared to the 3.75mm diameter implant. Secondary objectives to be studied will include adverse skin reactions, the feasibility of fitting the sound processor three weeks after surgical implantation, and investigation to see if the type of skin reactions observed following implantation could be related to the demographic data of subjects or the type of surgical technique used.

Study Design This study is a prospective, multicenter study of subjects' demographic and implant data. Subjects will be enrolled at two US sites.

Subject Population Twenty adult subjects 18 years or older will be included in the study from each participating partner site.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
        • Silverstein Institute
    • Michigan
      • Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States, 48833
        • Michigan Ear Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • conductive, mixed or single sided deafness
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger than 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Wide diameter bone anchored implant
Intervention: Implantation of a wide diameter bone anchored auditory implant either 3 or 4 mm in length, into the skull on the side of the ear where intervention is intended in order to restore hearing. In the case of a conductive or mixed hearing loss, that side is chosen. In patients with unilateral, profound sensori-neural hearing loss the implant is implanted on that side but the sound is transmitted to the side with the normal hearing ear via bone conduction stimulation.
4.5 mm wide diameter bone anchored implant
Other Names:
  • Oticon Medical Ponto Pro
  • Oticon Medical Ponto Pro Power
  • Osstell ISQ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Holger's Scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Holger's Scale is a 5 point that ranges from 0 - 4 scale that assesses skin reactions at the implant site where 0 means no reaction and 4 means excessive granulation, skin overgrowth, or scar formation requiring revision surgery
1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Implant Stability as Measured by the Osstell Implant Stability Quotient in the Vertical and Horizontal Plane
Time Frame: At surgery, 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Presently, the recommendations to load the sound processor on a bone anchored implant is 3 months (for adults). Using outcome measures, i.e., OSSTELL ISQ ranges from 0 -100 where 0 is least stable and 100 being the most stable.
At surgery, 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jack Wazen, MD, Sarasota Ear Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conductive Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Wide diameter bone anchored implant

3
Subscribe