Automated IADL Sensing to Refine Measurement of Older Adult Daily Activity

May 13, 2026 updated by: Steven M. Albert, University of Pittsburgh
The instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) refer to complex daily activities required for adult independence, such as preparing a meal or taking medications. This study will assess the efficacy of sensing technologies (smartwatch, computer vision, eye tracking) for recognizing IADL activities in naturalistic settings and score performance relative to ratings from occupational therapists. If successful in assessing the efficiency of IADL, the sensing technologies will be a valuable addition to geriatric assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

With declines in motor and cognitive function, even older adults living independently may be less efficient in performing daily activities, such as cooking and light housekeeping, which may signal an impending need for caregiver support and healthcare services. Clinicians currently lack automated tools for detecting early declines in daily activity. This research will assess the utility of motion sensors and computer vision assessment in detecting early deficits in the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), in this case structured cooking and cleaning tasks performed in a standardized kitchen. Older adults with normal cognitive status and those with mild cognitive impairment will be recruited from a research registry to assess differences in performance.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Andrea L Rosso, PhD
  • Phone Number: 412-624-3060
  • Email: ALR143@pitt.edu

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Steven M. Albert, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrea L Rosso, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible participants from the Community Research Connection registry of the University of Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant in University of Pittsburgh Pepper Center research registry
  2. Age 75+
  3. Female
  4. Residing in community
  5. Meets criteria for normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment on telephone screening (Memory Impairment Screen >= 5)
  6. Daily, independent performance of cooking and light cleaning tasks

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent
  2. Meets criteria for possible dementia (Memory Impairment Screen <= 4)
  3. Reports difficulty with activities of daily living (dressing, feeding oneself, using toilet, bathing)
  4. Uses mobility assistance device for indoor ambulation
  5. Medical conditions that may interfere with participation (e.g., severe untreated psychiatric disorders, unstable cardiovascular conditions, Parkinson's disease)
  6. Current participation in other interventional studies or clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Older adults with normal cognition
Memory Impairment Screen >= 5 and MOCA >= 26
Older adults with mild cognitive impairment
Memory Impairment Screen >= 5 and MOCA < 26

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency of IADL Performance
Time Frame: 15-minute telephone screening, 90-minute in-person assessment
Machine learning composite based on candidate sensing metrics, such as time to complete each element of kitchen task, pacing of activity, corrections, repetition of movement, adjustments of posture, and need to review directions.
15-minute telephone screening, 90-minute in-person assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance with Occupational Therapist Rating
Time Frame: One 90-min in-person assessment
Agreement between machine-learning sensor categorization and occupational therapist assessment of standardized kitchen tasks.
One 90-min in-person assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven M. Albert, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY25120169
  • P30AG024827 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data may be shared for future research with the appropriate sharing agreements in place. IPD includes demograhy, cognitive, sensor measures, and occupational therapist ratings.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

June 1, 2027-May 31, 2028

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified investigators can contact the PIs to request data. Deidentified data will be provided via password protected data exchange.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Ability General

Subscribe