Analgesic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Stability of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Thoracic Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

May 15, 2026 updated by: Nguyen Dang Thu
Thoracic surgery in children is considered a highly invasive procedure that significantly affects respiratory mechanics and cardiovascular function, resulting in substantial physiological disturbances during the perioperative period. In pediatric patients, the chest wall is structurally immature and highly compliant; therefore, impairment of ventilation after thoracic surgery may persist and predispose to atelectasis, hypoxemia, and other pulmonary complications. Inadequate postoperative analgesia may further compromise respiratory function, delay mobilization, and prolong recovery, particularly during the first 48-72 hours after thoracic surgery, when pain intensity is typically greatest. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has long been regarded as the reference technique for postoperative pain control in thoracic surgery. However, in pediatric patients, epidural catheter placement may be technically challenging and is associated with potential adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention, and other neuraxial-related complications. Thoracic epidural blockade produces bilateral sympathetic inhibition, which may lead to hemodynamic instability, particularly during thoracic surgery requiring lateral decubitus positioning and one-lung ventilation. Furthermore, epidural placement is often performed after induction of general anesthesia in children, which may limit early recognition of neurological complications. These concerns highlight the need for alternative regional analgesic techniques that provide effective analgesia while maintaining hemodynamic stability. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently emerged as a promising fascial plane block for thoracic analgesia. Injection of local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process allows cranio-caudal spread across multiple dermatomes, potentially providing analgesia to the posterior, lateral, and anterior thoracic walls. Increasing evidence suggests that ESPB offers effective perioperative analgesia in thoracic surgery with a favorable safety profile and minimal sympathetic blockade. Continuous ESPB catheter techniques have also been reported to provide sustained postoperative analgesia comparable to epidural analgesia. Despite these encouraging findings, direct comparisons between continuous ESPB and TEA in pediatric thoracic surgery remain limited, particularly regarding hemodynamic effects, adverse events, and technical feasibility. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic stability of continuous ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB with thoracic epidural analgesia in children undergoing thoracic surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at Vietnam National Children's Hospital between January 2024 and December 2024 after approval by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents or legal guardians before enrollment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and reported following the CONSORT guidelines.

Children aged 4-16 years with ASA physical status I-II undergoing elective unilateral thoracic surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Eligible procedures included surgery for pulmonary cysts, mediastinal tumors, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumors, and chest wall tumors. Patients with allergy to local anesthetics, significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease, coagulation disorders, untreated hypovolemia, infection at the puncture site, spinal or chest wall deformities, or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level were excluded. Patients were withdrawn if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative bleeding (>20 mL/kg) occurred, or if conversion to median sternotomy was required.

After enrollment, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following study groups:

  • ESPB group: After induction of general anesthesia, patients underwent ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T5-T6 or T6-T7 level using a high-frequency linear probe. Following hydrodissection confirmation, 0.25% levobupivacaine (0.3 mL/kg, maximum 20 mL) was injected and a catheter was inserted for continuous postoperative analgesia.
  • TEA group: After induction of general anesthesia, patients underwent thoracic epidural catheter placement at the T5-T6 or T6-T7 interspace using the loss-of-resistance technique with a Tuohy needle. After confirmation of correct placement, 0.25% levobupivacaine (0.3 mL/kg, maximum 20 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter.

General anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), fentanyl (2 µg/kg), propofol (3 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.6 mg/kg). Following endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation was adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ between 30-40 mmHg. One-lung ventilation was established using an Arndt bronchial blocker under fiberoptic guidance. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture to maintain a bispectral index between 40 and 60. Additional fentanyl (1 µg/kg) was administered when heart rate or blood pressure increased by more than 20% from baseline values despite adequate anesthetic depth. At the end of surgery, all patients received intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at rest and during movement. Multimodal analgesia included paracetamol every 6 hours and continuous infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine via catheter. If FPS-R scores were ≥4, a bolus dose of levobupivacaine was administered through the catheter. Intravenous morphine (0.05 mg/kg) was used as rescue analgesia when pain remained uncontrolled

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Vietnam
    • Hanoi
      • Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam, 100000
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary cyst, mediastinal tumor, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumor, or chest wall tumor requiring unilateral thoracic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to local anesthetics;
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease;
  • Coagulation disorders or untreated hypovolemia;
  • Infection at the puncture site;
  • Spinal or chest wall deformity or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level.
  • Patients were withdrawn from the study if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative complications occurred such as massive bleeding (>20 mL/kg), or if conversion to median sternotomy was required during surgery.
  • Patient's parents who do not consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.
Procedure: Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB)
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.
Active Comparator: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)
Patients will receive thoracic epidural analgesia before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, an epidural catheter will be inserted at the thoracic level under sterile conditions using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be administered via the epidural catheter, followed by continuous postoperative infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h for 72 postoperative hours
Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)
Patients will undergo thoracic epidural catheter placement for perioperative analgesia. Continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine will be maintained for 72 hours postoperatively

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative opioid consumption within the first 72 postoperative hours
Time Frame: From induction of anesthesia until 72 hours postoperatively
Total opioid consumption included intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative rescue morphine administration. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was recorded during surgery, while rescue morphine was administered when postoperative FPS-R score at rest ≥4 despite rescue local anesthetic bolus
From induction of anesthesia until 72 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: at 1hour, 2hour, 4hour, 8hour, 12hour, 18hour, 24hour, 30hour, 36hour, 42hour, 48hour, 54hour, 60hour and 72hour after surgery
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at rest and during movement at predefined postoperative time points
at 1hour, 2hour, 4hour, 8hour, 12hour, 18hour, 24hour, 30hour, 36hour, 42hour, 48hour, 54hour, 60hour and 72hour after surgery
Rescue analgesic requirement
Time Frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively
The number of patients requiring rescue morphine and total rescue morphine consumption were recorded
Within 72 hours postoperatively
Block-related characteristics
Time Frame: During block performance and surgery
Block failure was defined as intraoperative fentanyl requirement >4 mcg/kg.
During block performance and surgery
Catheter-related complications
Time Frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Catheter dislodgement, catheter occlusion, vascular puncture, and other catheter-related adverse events were recorded
Within 72 hours postoperatively
Postoperative complications and adverse events
Time Frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, tremor, respiratory complications, and other adverse events were evaluated
Within 72 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Nguyen Dang Thu

Collaborators

Vietnam National Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HungGMHS/No218

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Armenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe