Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Supraumbilical Surgery

August 20, 2025 updated by: Damanhour Teaching Hospital

Is Erector Spinae Plane Block More Effective Than Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Supraumbilical Surgery in Adult Patients

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in providing postoperative analgesia after supraumbilical surgery in adult patients and their impact on the patient's outcomes.

Background: Supraumbilical surgery for hernia repair is the second-most-popular after surgical inguinal hernia repair and is accompanied by moderate to severe postoperative pain, so patients always require large doses of opioids within the first postoperative day. Because opioids have several adverse effects such as drowsiness, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, regional analgesic techniques are an essential component of postoperative opioid-sparing analgesia. Previous studies have shown that regional analgesic techniques after abdominal wall surgeries can be an essential element of a postoperative pain management strategy with minimal adverse effects and hemodynamic responses.

ESPB provides both somatic and visceral analgesia to the abdominal wall, through the blockade of the anterior rami of spinal nerves and the rami communicants involving sympathetic nerve fibers. RSB provides analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall from the xiphoid process to the symphysis pubis, through the blockade of the anterior rami of the 7th to 12th intercostal nerves. The dermatomal distribution of ESPB and RSB makes them ideal regional analgesic techniques after abdominal surgery, and to our knowledge, there were no previous trials that studied the difference between them.

Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blind clinical trial on 60 patients scheduled for elective supraumbilical surgery under general anesthesia at our hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) and will receive: in group E; general anesthesia with postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB, whereas in group R; general anesthesia with postoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • El-Beheira
      • Damanhūr, El-Beheira, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Damanhour Teaching Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II
  • Age from 21 to 60 years
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 35 kg/m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > II
  • Age < 21 years or > 60 years
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Altered mental status
  • Pregnant women
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Chronic pain
  • Coagulation abnormalities or on anticoagulants
  • Severe hepatic or kidney disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group E (n=30)
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Postoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided ESPB
Active Comparator: Group R (n=30)
Rectus Sheath Block
Postoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided RSB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean and Standard deviation of time to the first request of postoperative rescue analgesic (minutes) (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 24 hours after block performance
The time interval between the block performance and the first request of postoperative analgesia
24 hours after block performance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean and Standard deviation of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 24 hours after block performance
NPRS measures the severity of postoperative pain, it is a 11 point scale from 0-10; where 0=No pain and 10=Worst possible pain (30 minutes, 1h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h) after block performance
24 hours after block performance
Mean and Standard deviation of the total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed (milligrams) (mean±SD)
Time Frame: 24 hours after block performance
The total dose of the rescue analgesic consumed in the first 24 hours after block performance
24 hours after block performance
Number of participants and Rate of Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: 24 hours after block performance
Number of participants and Rate of: Nausea, Vomiting, Hematoma formation, Bowel perforation, and Pneumothorax
24 hours after block performance

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed M Shaat, MD, Damanhour Teaching Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

Subscribe