Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Analgesic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Stability of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Thoracic Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

15 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Nguyen Dang Thu
Thoracic surgery in children is considered a highly invasive procedure that significantly affects respiratory mechanics and cardiovascular function, resulting in substantial physiological disturbances during the perioperative period. In pediatric patients, the chest wall is structurally immature and highly compliant; therefore, impairment of ventilation after thoracic surgery may persist and predispose to atelectasis, hypoxemia, and other pulmonary complications. Inadequate postoperative analgesia may further compromise respiratory function, delay mobilization, and prolong recovery, particularly during the first 48-72 hours after thoracic surgery, when pain intensity is typically greatest. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has long been regarded as the reference technique for postoperative pain control in thoracic surgery. However, in pediatric patients, epidural catheter placement may be technically challenging and is associated with potential adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention, and other neuraxial-related complications. Thoracic epidural blockade produces bilateral sympathetic inhibition, which may lead to hemodynamic instability, particularly during thoracic surgery requiring lateral decubitus positioning and one-lung ventilation. Furthermore, epidural placement is often performed after induction of general anesthesia in children, which may limit early recognition of neurological complications. These concerns highlight the need for alternative regional analgesic techniques that provide effective analgesia while maintaining hemodynamic stability. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently emerged as a promising fascial plane block for thoracic analgesia. Injection of local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process allows cranio-caudal spread across multiple dermatomes, potentially providing analgesia to the posterior, lateral, and anterior thoracic walls. Increasing evidence suggests that ESPB offers effective perioperative analgesia in thoracic surgery with a favorable safety profile and minimal sympathetic blockade. Continuous ESPB catheter techniques have also been reported to provide sustained postoperative analgesia comparable to epidural analgesia. Despite these encouraging findings, direct comparisons between continuous ESPB and TEA in pediatric thoracic surgery remain limited, particularly regarding hemodynamic effects, adverse events, and technical feasibility. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic stability of continuous ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB with thoracic epidural analgesia in children undergoing thoracic surgery.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at Vietnam National Children's Hospital between January 2024 and December 2024 after approval by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents or legal guardians before enrollment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and reported following the CONSORT guidelines.

Children aged 4-16 years with ASA physical status I-II undergoing elective unilateral thoracic surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Eligible procedures included surgery for pulmonary cysts, mediastinal tumors, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumors, and chest wall tumors. Patients with allergy to local anesthetics, significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease, coagulation disorders, untreated hypovolemia, infection at the puncture site, spinal or chest wall deformities, or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level were excluded. Patients were withdrawn if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative bleeding (>20 mL/kg) occurred, or if conversion to median sternotomy was required.

After enrollment, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following study groups:

  • ESPB group: After induction of general anesthesia, patients underwent ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T5-T6 or T6-T7 level using a high-frequency linear probe. Following hydrodissection confirmation, 0.25% levobupivacaine (0.3 mL/kg, maximum 20 mL) was injected and a catheter was inserted for continuous postoperative analgesia.
  • TEA group: After induction of general anesthesia, patients underwent thoracic epidural catheter placement at the T5-T6 or T6-T7 interspace using the loss-of-resistance technique with a Tuohy needle. After confirmation of correct placement, 0.25% levobupivacaine (0.3 mL/kg, maximum 20 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter.

General anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), fentanyl (2 µg/kg), propofol (3 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.6 mg/kg). Following endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation was adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ between 30-40 mmHg. One-lung ventilation was established using an Arndt bronchial blocker under fiberoptic guidance. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture to maintain a bispectral index between 40 and 60. Additional fentanyl (1 µg/kg) was administered when heart rate or blood pressure increased by more than 20% from baseline values despite adequate anesthetic depth. At the end of surgery, all patients received intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at rest and during movement. Multimodal analgesia included paracetamol every 6 hours and continuous infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine via catheter. If FPS-R scores were ≥4, a bolus dose of levobupivacaine was administered through the catheter. Intravenous morphine (0.05 mg/kg) was used as rescue analgesia when pain remained uncontrolled

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

70

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Hanoi
      • Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam, 100000
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Vietnam National Children's Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary cyst, mediastinal tumor, diaphragmatic hernia, lung tumor, or chest wall tumor requiring unilateral thoracic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to local anesthetics;
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease;
  • Coagulation disorders or untreated hypovolemia;
  • Infection at the puncture site;
  • Spinal or chest wall deformity or paravertebral tumors near the puncture level.
  • Patients were withdrawn from the study if consent was withdrawn, if major intraoperative complications occurred such as massive bleeding (>20 mL/kg), or if conversion to median sternotomy was required during surgery.
  • Patient's parents who do not consent to participate in the study

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic ESPB before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the transverse process and erector spinae muscle at the appropriate thoracic level. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be injected into the erector spinae plane, followed by catheter placement for continuous postoperative analgesia. Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h will be maintained for 72 postoperative hours.
Comparador activo: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)
Patients will receive thoracic epidural analgesia before surgical incision. After induction of general anesthesia, an epidural catheter will be inserted at the thoracic level under sterile conditions using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus dose of levobupivacaine 0.25% at 0.3 mL/kg will be administered via the epidural catheter, followed by continuous postoperative infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% at 0.2 mL/kg/h for 72 postoperative hours
Patients will undergo thoracic epidural catheter placement for perioperative analgesia. Continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine will be maintained for 72 hours postoperatively

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cumulative opioid consumption within the first 72 postoperative hours
Periodo de tiempo: From induction of anesthesia until 72 hours postoperatively
Total opioid consumption included intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative rescue morphine administration. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was recorded during surgery, while rescue morphine was administered when postoperative FPS-R score at rest ≥4 despite rescue local anesthetic bolus
From induction of anesthesia until 72 hours postoperatively

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative pain scores
Periodo de tiempo: at 1hour, 2hour, 4hour, 8hour, 12hour, 18hour, 24hour, 30hour, 36hour, 42hour, 48hour, 54hour, 60hour and 72hour after surgery
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at rest and during movement at predefined postoperative time points
at 1hour, 2hour, 4hour, 8hour, 12hour, 18hour, 24hour, 30hour, 36hour, 42hour, 48hour, 54hour, 60hour and 72hour after surgery
Rescue analgesic requirement
Periodo de tiempo: Within 72 hours postoperatively
The number of patients requiring rescue morphine and total rescue morphine consumption were recorded
Within 72 hours postoperatively
Block-related characteristics
Periodo de tiempo: During block performance and surgery
Block failure was defined as intraoperative fentanyl requirement >4 mcg/kg.
During block performance and surgery
Catheter-related complications
Periodo de tiempo: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Catheter dislodgement, catheter occlusion, vascular puncture, and other catheter-related adverse events were recorded
Within 72 hours postoperatively
Postoperative complications and adverse events
Periodo de tiempo: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, tremor, respiratory complications, and other adverse events were evaluated
Within 72 hours postoperatively

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2023

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de diciembre de 2025

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de diciembre de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

22 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

22 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir