Robotic Dog Intervention on Emotional Well-Being and Quality of Life (ROBDOG)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Eysan Hanzade Umac, Koç University

Effectiveness and Feasibility of a Robotic Dog Intervention on Emotional Well-Being and Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients With Hematological Malignancies Undergoing HSCT

The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) process imposes a substantial psychological burden, leading to impaired emotional well-being due to intensive treatment, isolation, and immunosuppression. Patients often experience social withdrawal, loneliness, and loss of control, which may result in persistent anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life (QoL) if unaddressed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of an AI-powered robotic dog in improving emotional well-being and QoL in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience substantial psychological burden related to intensive treatment, protective isolation, prolonged hospitalization, and immunosuppression. Anxiety, emotional distress, loneliness, and reduced quality of life are common during the post-transplant inpatient period. However, infection control precautions and isolation procedures may limit access to traditional psychosocial support interventions in HSCT settings.

Technology-assisted interventions, particularly social robots, have emerged as promising approaches for supporting emotional well-being in pediatric healthcare environments. AI-powered robotic companion devices may provide interactive engagement, emotional comfort, and opportunities for play during prolonged hospitalization while remaining compatible with infection control requirements.

This pilot randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of an AI-powered robotic dog intervention in improving emotional well-being and quality of life in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients aged 8-15 years
  • Diagnosed with a hematological malignancy and undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Hospitalized in a protective isolation room during the post-transplant inpatient period
  • Expected to remain hospitalized under isolation for approximately 30 days post-transplant
  • Able to understand and respond to Turkish-language self-report questionnaires
  • Clinically stable and deemed eligible for participation by the treating clinical team
  • Able to interact with the robotic dog at a basic functional level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment or neurodevelopmental conditions preventing meaningful interaction or self-report
  • Acute neurological conditions, delirium, or severe psychiatric crisis (e.g., acute agitation, suicidal ideation)
  • Requirement for intensive care, invasive ventilation, or a clinically unstable condition
  • Severe visual, hearing, or motor impairments that prevent interaction with the robotic dog
  • Additional infection control restrictions prevent the placement or use of the robotic dog in the isolation room
  • Anticipated early discharge, transfer, or inability to complete follow-up assessments
  • Severe fear, intolerance, or refusal to interact with robotic or electronic devices

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care & Control Group Care
Participants in the control group will receive standard post-transplant inpatient care routinely provided in the HSCT unit. Standard care includes protective isolation procedures, restricted visitor access, routine clinical monitoring, and infection control practices during the inpatient transplantation period. Children are permitted to use personal electronic devices and other approved washable or disinfectable materials available within institutional infection control regulations. No structured psychosocial or technology-assisted intervention will be provided to the control group during the study period.
Experimental: Intervention Group (AIBO Group):
Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive standard post-transplant inpatient care in addition to a technology-assisted psychosocial support intervention during the inpatient isolation period following HSCT. The intervention will be implemented throughout the hospitalization period, and participants will be encouraged to engage with the device regularly during daily care routines. Baseline assessments will be performed within the first 24-48 hours after HSCT, and follow-up assessments will be conducted weekly for four weeks. Intervention adherence, feasibility indicators, and adverse events will be monitored throughout the study period. Infection control procedures will be applied according to institutional protocols.
AIBO is an AI-powered interactive robot dog that engages children through play and touch-based interactions, including responding to petting, interacting with a ball, and making simple gestures. Using visual, auditory, and tactile sensing, AIBO enables spontaneous, child-centered interactions, expressing emotions through eye color changes, tail movements, and vocalizations, while gradually developing more adaptive behaviors through repeated interactions (weight: ~2.2 kg; dimensions: 180 × 293 × 305 mm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Positive and Negative Affect
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, before intervention initiation) and weekly assessments during the intervention period at Weeks 2, 3, and 4.
Emotional affect will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (PANAS-C). The scale evaluates positive and negative emotional states experienced by pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during the inpatient isolation period.
Baseline (Day 1, before intervention initiation) and weekly assessments during the intervention period at Weeks 2, 3, and 4.
Change in Emotional Well-being
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, before intervention initiation) and weekly assessments during the intervention period at Weeks 2, 3, and 4.
Children's emotional well-being will be assessed using the Stirling Children's Well-being Scale. The scale evaluates positive emotional functioning, interpersonal relationships, and overall psychological well-being in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during the inpatient isolation period.
Baseline (Day 1, before intervention initiation) and weekly assessments during the intervention period at Weeks 2, 3, and 4.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to intervention initiation) and Week 4 (post-intervention assessment after completion of the 4-week intervention period).
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0). The scale consists of 23 items evaluating physical, emotional, social, and school functioning in children and adolescents. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Baseline (Day 1, prior to intervention initiation) and Week 4 (post-intervention assessment after completion of the 4-week intervention period).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to the small sample size and privacy considerations related to pediatric participants.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Subscribe