Effects of Combined Cervical and Oculomotor Exercises on Dynamic Balance in Elderly

May 20, 2026 updated by: Foundation University Islamabad

This study focuses on improving balance in elderly individuals (aged 60-80 years) who may experience dizziness or instability while walking or performing daily activities. Poor balance increases the risk of falls, which can lead to serious injuries and loss of independence.

The study compares two types of exercise programs:

One group performs combined cervical (neck) exercises + eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises The other group performs eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises only These exercises are done 3 times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting 30-45 minutes.

The goal is to determine whether combining neck and eye exercises improves balance more effectively than eye exercises alone.

This research may help:

Reduce fall risk in elderly people Improve mobility and independence Provide better rehabilitation programs for physiotherapists

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Falls are a major health concern among older adults, frequently leading to serious injuries , and diminished participation in daily activities, which negatively affect overall quality of life. Therefore, designing effective, accessible, and evidence-based strategies to improve balance and prevent falls is essential for promoting healthy aging.because it introduces a novel approach that combines cervical proprioceptive exercises and oculomotor exercises alongside the Otago exercise program. While previous research has demonstrated that both cervical and oculomotor exercises independently enhance balance and reduce fall risk, their combined effects, particularly when integrated into a structured balance program like Otago, remain largely unexplored. By addressing this gap, the present study offers an innovative strategy that targets multiple systems involved in maintaining postural control., the combined intervention is designed to be practical, cost-effective, and easily implemented in various settings, including clinics, community centers, and at home., the study has the potential to guide physiotherapists and rehabilitation professionals toward adopting more holistic balance training protocols. Ultimately, the findings may contribute to reducing fall rates, promoting independence, and enhancing the overall quality of life in the elderly population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants aged 60-80 years.
  • DHI-mild score(0-30)
  • Ability to follow instructions and participate in exercises.
  • BBS moderate (21-40)
  • Normal to corrected vision
  • Negative Dix Hallpike

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed vestibular disorders
  • Neurological or musculoskeletal conditions affecting balance.
  • Patients with VBI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: occulomotor exercises with otago exercises group B

Frequency: 3 sessions/week | Duration: 30-45 min

* Week 1-2: Eye exercises 10-12 reps, VOR x1 (30-40 sec), basic balance training, walking 5-12 min

* Week 3-4: Eye exercises 12-15 reps, VOR x1→x2 (1 min), moderate balance training, walking 12-15 min

* Week 5-6: Eye exercises 15-20 reps, VOR x1+x2 (1-2 min), advanced balance training, walking 15-20 min

Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still.

Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets.

Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head and target in opposite directions.

All participants will perform the Otago exercise program, a well-established, evidence-based fall prevention program focusing on lower limb strengthening and dynamic balance. It includes:

  • Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises).
  • Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands).
  • A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.
Experimental: Group A (Cervical + Oculomotor + Otago)
  • Frequency: 3 sessions/week | Duration: 30-45 min
  • Week 1-2:

Cervical ROM 10-12 reps, chin tuck 5-7 sec ×10, isometrics 5-6 sec ×5-6, eye exercises 10-12 reps, VOR x1 (30-40 sec), walking 5-12 min * Week 3-4: Cervical ROM 12-15 reps, chin tuck 8-10 sec ×12, isometrics 7-8 sec ×8-10, eye exercises 12-15 reps, VOR x1→x2 (1 min), walking 12-15 min

* Week 5-6: Cervical ROM 15-20 reps, chin tuck 10-12 sec ×15, isometrics 10 sec ×10-12, eye exercises 15-20 reps, VOR x1+x2 (1-2 min), walking 15-20 min

Cervical range of motion exercises in flexion, extension, rotation, and side bending (gentle, controlled movements).

Chin tuck exercises in supine or sitting positions to activate deep cervical flexors.

Isometric neck strengthening exercises (flexion, extension, lateral flexion), focusing on controlled, static holds.

Occulomotor Exercises:

Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still.

Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets.

Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head in opposite direction Otago exercises Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises). Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands).

A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used Cut-off Values Greater than 45 → Increased risk of falls 21-40 → Moderate balance impairment Outcome Interpretation Higher score = Better balance
6 weeks
Functional Mobility
Time Frame: 6 weeks

The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) was used

Cut-off Values:

less than 10 seconds → Normal mobility 10-19 seconds → Good mobility 20-29 seconds → Mild impairment

  • 30 seconds → Severe impairment > 13.5 seconds → Increased risk of falls (important clinical cutoff)

Interpretation:

Lower time indicates better performance

6 weeks
Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Four Square Step Test was used to evaluate dynamic balance

Cut-off Values:

< 15 seconds → Normal performance > 15 seconds → Increased risk of falls

Interpretation:

Lower time indicates better balance

6 weeks
Dizziness related disability
Time Frame: 6 weeks

4. Dizziness Handicap was used

Cut-off Values:

0-30 → Mild handicap (used in inclusion criteria) 31-60 → Moderate handicap 61-100 → Severe handicap

Interpretation:

Higher score indicates greater dizziness-related disability

6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Risk of Fall

Clinical Trials on occulomotor with otago exercises

Subscribe