Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effects of Combined Cervical and Oculomotor Exercises on Dynamic Balance in Elderly

20 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Foundation University Islamabad

This study focuses on improving balance in elderly individuals (aged 60-80 years) who may experience dizziness or instability while walking or performing daily activities. Poor balance increases the risk of falls, which can lead to serious injuries and loss of independence.

The study compares two types of exercise programs:

One group performs combined cervical (neck) exercises + eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises The other group performs eye (oculomotor) exercises + Otago balance exercises only These exercises are done 3 times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting 30-45 minutes.

The goal is to determine whether combining neck and eye exercises improves balance more effectively than eye exercises alone.

This research may help:

Reduce fall risk in elderly people Improve mobility and independence Provide better rehabilitation programs for physiotherapists

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Falls are a major health concern among older adults, frequently leading to serious injuries , and diminished participation in daily activities, which negatively affect overall quality of life. Therefore, designing effective, accessible, and evidence-based strategies to improve balance and prevent falls is essential for promoting healthy aging.because it introduces a novel approach that combines cervical proprioceptive exercises and oculomotor exercises alongside the Otago exercise program. While previous research has demonstrated that both cervical and oculomotor exercises independently enhance balance and reduce fall risk, their combined effects, particularly when integrated into a structured balance program like Otago, remain largely unexplored. By addressing this gap, the present study offers an innovative strategy that targets multiple systems involved in maintaining postural control., the combined intervention is designed to be practical, cost-effective, and easily implemented in various settings, including clinics, community centers, and at home., the study has the potential to guide physiotherapists and rehabilitation professionals toward adopting more holistic balance training protocols. Ultimately, the findings may contribute to reducing fall rates, promoting independence, and enhancing the overall quality of life in the elderly population.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

48

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Islamabad, Pakistán, 44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants aged 60-80 years.
  • DHI-mild score(0-30)
  • Ability to follow instructions and participate in exercises.
  • BBS moderate (21-40)
  • Normal to corrected vision
  • Negative Dix Hallpike

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed vestibular disorders
  • Neurological or musculoskeletal conditions affecting balance.
  • Patients with VBI

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: occulomotor exercises with otago exercises group B

Frequency: 3 sessions/week | Duration: 30-45 min

* Week 1-2: Eye exercises 10-12 reps, VOR x1 (30-40 sec), basic balance training, walking 5-12 min

* Week 3-4: Eye exercises 12-15 reps, VOR x1→x2 (1 min), moderate balance training, walking 12-15 min

* Week 5-6: Eye exercises 15-20 reps, VOR x1+x2 (1-2 min), advanced balance training, walking 15-20 min

Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still.

Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets.

Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head and target in opposite directions.

All participants will perform the Otago exercise program, a well-established, evidence-based fall prevention program focusing on lower limb strengthening and dynamic balance. It includes:

  • Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises).
  • Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands).
  • A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.
Experimental: Group A (Cervical + Oculomotor + Otago)
  • Frequency: 3 sessions/week | Duration: 30-45 min
  • Week 1-2:

Cervical ROM 10-12 reps, chin tuck 5-7 sec ×10, isometrics 5-6 sec ×5-6, eye exercises 10-12 reps, VOR x1 (30-40 sec), walking 5-12 min * Week 3-4: Cervical ROM 12-15 reps, chin tuck 8-10 sec ×12, isometrics 7-8 sec ×8-10, eye exercises 12-15 reps, VOR x1→x2 (1 min), walking 12-15 min

* Week 5-6: Cervical ROM 15-20 reps, chin tuck 10-12 sec ×15, isometrics 10 sec ×10-12, eye exercises 15-20 reps, VOR x1+x2 (1-2 min), walking 15-20 min

Cervical range of motion exercises in flexion, extension, rotation, and side bending (gentle, controlled movements).

Chin tuck exercises in supine or sitting positions to activate deep cervical flexors.

Isometric neck strengthening exercises (flexion, extension, lateral flexion), focusing on controlled, static holds.

Occulomotor Exercises:

Smooth pursuit exercises, where the eyes follow a moving target horizontally, vertically, and diagonally while keeping the head still.

Saccadic eye movements, involving quick shifts of gaze between two stationary targets.

Gaze stability (VOR x1 and VOR x2) exercises, involving head movements while maintaining focus on a target, and moving the head in opposite direction Otago exercises Strengthening exercises (e.g., knee extensions, hip abduction, calf raises). Static and dynamic balance exercises (e.g., tandem stance, backward walking, sit-to-stand without using hands).

A progressive walking plan to improve endurance and confidence during ambulation.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Dynamic Balance
Periodo de tiempo: 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used Cut-off Values Greater than 45 → Increased risk of falls 21-40 → Moderate balance impairment Outcome Interpretation Higher score = Better balance
6 weeks
Functional Mobility
Periodo de tiempo: 6 weeks

The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) was used

Cut-off Values:

less than 10 seconds → Normal mobility 10-19 seconds → Good mobility 20-29 seconds → Mild impairment

  • 30 seconds → Severe impairment > 13.5 seconds → Increased risk of falls (important clinical cutoff)

Interpretation:

Lower time indicates better performance

6 weeks
Dynamic Balance
Periodo de tiempo: 6 weeks

Four Square Step Test was used to evaluate dynamic balance

Cut-off Values:

< 15 seconds → Normal performance > 15 seconds → Increased risk of falls

Interpretation:

Lower time indicates better balance

6 weeks
Dizziness related disability
Periodo de tiempo: 6 weeks

4. Dizziness Handicap was used

Cut-off Values:

0-30 → Mild handicap (used in inclusion criteria) 31-60 → Moderate handicap 61-100 → Severe handicap

Interpretation:

Higher score indicates greater dizziness-related disability

6 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

18 de noviembre de 2025

Finalización primaria (Actual)

10 de mayo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

10 de mayo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

18 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

27 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

27 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

20 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir