Cerebral Microembolization During Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Comparison of Different Pulsed Field Ablation Systems (MICROPFA)

May 21, 2026 updated by: Ivan Zeljkovic

Cerebral Microembolization During Pulmonary Vein Isolation: a Randomized Comparison of Different Pulsed Field Ablation Systems

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare cerebral microembolization during pulmonary vein isolation between different pulsed field ablation systems in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Adult patients with an indication for catheter ablation will be randomized to one of the included ablation systems: PulseSelect, Varipulse, Farapulse, Sphere-9, or Sphere-360. Microembolic signals will be assessed using transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure. The primary outcome will be the difference in the change in microembolic signal burden, expressed as ΔMES, between the different ablation systems.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, parallel-group interventional trial conducted at Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia and University Hospital Center Sisters of Charity, Zagreb, Croatia. The study will include adult patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who have a clinical indication for catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation.

Eligible patients will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization sequence to undergo pulmonary vein isolation with one of the following pulsed field ablation systems: PulseSelect, Varipulse, Farapulse, Sphere-9, or Sphere-360. All procedures will be performed according to standard clinical practice, with continuous periprocedural anticoagulation in accordance with current guidelines.

Cerebral microembolization will be assessed using transcranial Doppler. The examination will be performed immediately before the ablation procedure and repeated after the procedure. The presence and number of microembolic signals will be recorded. This will allow assessment of changes in microembolic signal burden within each group and comparison of these changes between different pulsed field ablation systems.

Demographic, clinical, and procedural data will be collected, including age, sex, type of atrial fibrillation, comorbidities, procedure duration, number of ablation applications, and procedural complications. The study will also record procedure-related clinical neurological events.

The primary outcome will be the difference in the change in the number of microembolic signals before and after the procedure, expressed as ΔMES, between the different pulsed field ablation systems. Secondary outcomes will include within-group changes in microembolic signal burden, incidence of new microembolic signals after the procedure, association between procedural parameters and ΔMES, and occurrence of procedure-related neurological events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
        • UH Dubrava
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ivan Zeljković, MD, Phd
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mihovil Santini, MD
      • Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
        • University Hospital Center Sisters of Charity, Zagreb, Croatia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Indication for catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation
  • Feasibility of transcranial Doppler assessment
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent stroke or transient ischemic attack
  • Significant cerebrovascular disease preventing reliable transcranial Doppler assessment
  • Severe valvular or structural heart disease
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to receive anticoagulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PulseSelect PFA
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo clinically indicated pulmonary vein isolation using the PulseSelect pulsed field ablation system. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the PulseSelect pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Active Comparator: Varipulse PFA
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo clinically indicated pulmonary vein isolation using the Varipulse pulsed field ablation system. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Varipulse pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Active Comparator: Farapulse PFA
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo clinically indicated pulmonary vein isolation using the Farapulse pulsed field ablation system. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Farapulse pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedu
Active Comparator: Sphere-9 PFA
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo clinically indicated pulmonary vein isolation using the Sphere-9 pulsed field ablation system. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Sphere-9 pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.
Active Comparator: Sphere-360 PFA
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo clinically indicated pulmonary vein isolation using the Sphere-360 pulsed field ablation system. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure
Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Sphere-360 pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in microembolic signal burden after pulmonary vein isolation
Time Frame: During procedure
Difference in the number of cerebral microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler before and after pulmonary vein isolation, expressed as ΔMES, compared between the different pulsed field ablation systems.
During procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-group change in microembolic signal burden
Time Frame: During procedure
Change in the number of cerebral microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler before and after pulmonary vein isolation within each pulsed field ablation system group.
During procedure
Incidence of new microembolic signals after ablation
Time Frame: Immediately after the ablation procedure
Proportion of participants with newly detected cerebral microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler after pulmonary vein isolation.
Immediately after the ablation procedure
Procedure-related clinical neurological events
Time Frame: From the start of the ablation procedure through 72 hours after the procedure
Occurrence of clinically evident neurological events related to the ablation procedure, including stroke or transient ischemic attack.
From the start of the ablation procedure through 72 hours after the procedure
Association between procedure duration and ΔMES
Time Frame: During procedure
Association between total procedure duration and the change in cerebral microembolic signal burden before and after pulmonary vein isolation.
During procedure
Association between number of ablation applications and ΔMES
Time Frame: During procedure
Association between the number of pulsed field ablation applications delivered during pulmonary vein isolation and the change in cerebral microembolic signal burden before and after the procedure.
During procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ablation of Arrhythmia's

Clinical Trials on Pulsed field ablation using PulseSelect system

Subscribe