Blood Cell Ratios as Predictors of Response to Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis (PRP-NLR)

May 20, 2026 updated by: Utku Gürhan

Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Related Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices as Predictors of Clinical Response to Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study

Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is a widely used treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but patients respond to it very differently and there is currently no simple, inexpensive way to predict who will benefit. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and related indices derived from a routine complete blood count reflect a person's baseline inflammatory state. This prospective single-arm observational cohort study investigates whether the baseline NLR, together with the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), predicts the clinical response to intra-articular PRP in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis. The investigators will enroll 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years, each of whom receives a standardized course of three leukocyte-poor PRP injections one week apart. Patients are followed for 6 months, and the primary clinical outcome is the change in the WOMAC osteoarthritis index at 6 months. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values. If a baseline blood ratio predicts response, it could become a low-cost tool to guide patient selection for PRP.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale: Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, but the clinical response is highly variable and no inexpensive, routinely available biomarker currently guides patient selection. Recent work indicates that the peripheral-blood inflammatory phenotype is associated with PRP response (Tonutti et al., 2025) and that the absolute neutrophil count is an independent early-response predictor (De Luca et al., 2025). However, simple complete-blood-count-derived ratios such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have not been tested prospectively for this purpose. This study addresses that gap with a pragmatic, low-cost translational biomarker design.

Design: Prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values; patients are not informed of their NLR; statistical analysis is conducted blinded.

Population and Setting: 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years with symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index below 40, recruited over a 4-month window (target 30 enrollments per month) from the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital. Approximately 180 patients are anticipated to be screened, with a target of 102 completed, analyzable participants after an estimated 15 percent attrition.

Intervention (uniform, per protocol): Each participant receives three leukocyte-poor PRP injections at one-week intervals. PRP is prepared by manual double-spin centrifugation (soft spin 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, then hard spin 3300 rpm for 10 minutes) from 20 mL of whole blood per session (total 60 mL per patient across the three sessions), anticoagulated with 8.5 percent ACD-A, without exogenous activation, targeting a 4 to 6 fold platelet concentration. Injections are delivered under ultrasound guidance via a superolateral approach with skin infiltration of 1 percent lidocaine. A 48-hour restriction on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is applied after each injection.

Biomarkers: The primary predictor is the baseline NLR. Secondary predictors are PLR, SII, and MLR; tertiary predictors are C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All are derived from a routine baseline complete blood count.

Outcomes: The primary clinical outcome is the change in WOMAC total score at 6 months. Treatment response is defined a priori as at least 30 percent improvement in WOMAC together with fulfilment of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. Clinical assessments occur at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months.

PRP Product Characterization: Quality control is performed in two tiers. Tier 1 (all 120 patients, all 360 batches) records the final platelet concentration, the total leukocyte count, and the final volume. Tier 2, a pre-specified validation subset of approximately 40 patients (the first 20 consecutive patients plus every fifth subsequent patient, approximately 120 batches), additionally records the leukocyte differential and erythrocyte contamination.

Statistical Analysis and Sample Size: The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression of 6-month WOMAC change on baseline NLR, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC. A secondary analysis evaluates the discriminative performance of baseline NLR for responder status by receiver operating characteristic analysis. For the primary regression (alpha 0.05, power 0.80, one numerator degree of freedom, five predictors, effect size f-squared 0.10), 82 participants are required; the secondary analysis requires 95. To satisfy both, the enrollment target is 120, anticipating 102 completers.

Ethics and Reporting: Ethics approval is sought from the Girne University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Reporting follows the STROBE and REMARK recommendations, and the protocol follows SPIRIT guidance.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Kyrenia, Cyprus
        • University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital - Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Utku Gurhan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fazli Levent Umur, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients aged 40 to 60 years presenting to the orthopedic clinic of the University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital, with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3, who are candidates for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40 to 60 years
  • Symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3 on weight-bearing radiographs
  • Body mass index below 40
  • Candidate for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to attend the 6-month follow-up schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune disease
  • Active acute infection at the time of enrollment
  • Current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, or current or recent chemotherapy
  • Any contraindication to platelet-rich plasma per the 2025 GRIIP recommendations
  • Intra-articular injection of the index knee within the previous 6 months
  • Inability to comply with the planned follow-up schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in WOMAC total score at 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change from baseline in the total score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months after the first injection. The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression testing the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as the predictor of interest, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC score.
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment response at 6 months (responder versus non-responder)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Treatment response is defined a priori as at least 30 percent improvement in WOMAC total score together with fulfilment of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. The discriminative performance of the baseline NLR for responder status is assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis with the optimal threshold identified by the Youden index.
Baseline to 6 months
Predictive value of PLR, SII, and MLR for 6-month WOMAC change
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Association of the baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) with the change in WOMAC total score at 6 months, evaluated by multivariable regression.
Baseline to 6 months
Change in WOMAC total score at 1 and 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 month and to 3 months
Change from baseline in WOMAC total score at the 1-month and 3-month assessments, describing the trajectory of clinical response.
Baseline to 1 month and to 3 months
Change in knee pain on a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months
Change from baseline in knee pain on a Visual Analogue Scale at the 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month assessments.
Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months
Change in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change from baseline in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores at 6 months.
Baseline to 6 months
Association of baseline CRP and ESR with treatment response
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Exploratory association of the baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with 6-month treatment response.
Baseline to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Platelet-rich plasma product characterization
Time Frame: At the three injection sessions (study weeks 1, 2, and 3)
Two-tier quality control of the PRP product. Tier 1 (all 120 patients, all 360 batches): final platelet concentration, total leukocyte count, and final volume. Tier 2 (a pre-specified validation subset of approximately 40 patients, approximately 120 batches): leukocyte differential and erythrocyte contamination.
At the three injection sessions (study weeks 1, 2, and 3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Utku Gurhan, MD, University of Kyrenia
  • Sub-Investigator: Fazli Levent Umur, MD, University of Kyrenia
  • Sub-Investigator: Enes Sari, MD, Near East University
  • Sub-Investigator: Yakup Kahve, MD, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Tonutti et al. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118674
  • De Luca et al. Nutrients. 2025. doi:10.3390/nu17193134
  • Lee et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07475-1
  • Zhang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026. doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1787872
  • Louis et al. Arthroscopy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.074
  • GRIIP recommendations on intra-articular orthobiologics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. doi:10.1002/ksa.12682

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant-level data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication, subject to institutional and ethics-committee approval. Aggregated summary tables will accompany the published manuscript as supplementary material.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months after manuscript publication, with no specified end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable request for academic research purposes; a data use agreement to be signed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Subscribe