- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03869229
Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis
Effectiveness of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Hip or Glenohumeral Joint and Analysis of the Regeneration Processes Based on Inflammatory Markers, microRNAs and Clinical Features.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Marek Postula, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +48605113346
- Email: mpostula@wum.edu.pl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Robert Śmigielski, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +48609455055
- Email: rsmigielski@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Mazovian
-
Warsaw, Mazovian, Poland, 00-132
- Recruiting
- Life Clinic
-
Contact:
- Robert Śmigielski, MD
- Phone Number: +48609455055
-
Contact:
- Robert Śmigielski
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of osteoarthritis of the knee, hip or glenohumeral joint
- confirmation cartilage injury, articular cartilage part or full-thickness injury by MR (Magnetic Resonance)
- joint pain of VAS (visual analog scale score) is 1 or higher while resting, 2 and higher during any physical activity
- loss of joint function based on scale specific for certain joints; for hip: HHS scale (Harris Hip Score), HOOS scale (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC); for knee: modified HHS score (Harris Hip Score), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC Questionnaire) and KOOS scale (Osteoarthritis Outcome Score); glenohumeral joint: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH], CONSTANT score
- clinical indication for surgical intervention
- no effect of pharmacotherapy according to The World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder lasting at least 6 months
- no effect of physical rehabilitation lasting at least 6 months
- willing to participate understand and sign the consent form of this study
Exclusion Criteria:
- active inflammatory disease or infection,
- skin disease/infection around joint,
- severe heart failure,
- anemia,
- active/history of human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV), the hepatitis B virus (HBV) or the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,
- pregnant or breast-feeding women,
- mental disease, addiction to drugs or alcohol,
- participate other clinical experiments in 6 months,
- refuse to sign the consent form, or cannot keep follow-up visit.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: osteoarthritis of the knee
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)
|
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)- ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of at least 10 million of ADMCS per procedure, maximum four procedures (i.e.
injections per joint), minimum number of cells pre protocol 40 million
|
Active Comparator: osteoarthritis of the hip
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)
|
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)- ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of at least 10 million of ADMCS per procedure, maximum four procedures (i.e.
injections per joint), minimum number of cells pre protocol 40 million
|
Active Comparator: osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)
|
Intervention: Intra-articular injection of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSC)- ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of at least 10 million of ADMCS per procedure, maximum four procedures (i.e.
injections per joint), minimum number of cells pre protocol 40 million
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE (HOOS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) score.
HOOS consists of 5 subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in activities of daily living (ADL), and function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and hip-related quality of life (QOL).
In total, 40 items: 10 items for pain, 5 items for other symptoms (3 for symptoms and 2 for stiff- ness), 17 items for function in ADL, 4 items for function in Sport/Rec, and 4 items for hip-related QOL.
Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is scored from 0 to 4. Scores are summarized for each subscale and trans- formed to a 0-100 scale (0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems).
|
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS) score.
The domains covered are pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion.
The pain domain measures pain severity and its effect on activities and need for pain medication.
The function domain consists of daily activities (stair use, using public transportation, sitting, and managing shoes and socks) and gait (limp, support needed, and walking distance).
Deformity takes into account hip flexion, adduction, internal rotation, and extremity length discrepancy.
Range of motion measures hip flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation, and adduction.
There are 10 items.
The score has a maximum of 100 points (best possible outcome) covering pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 5 points).
|
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) The five patient-relevant subscales of KOOS are scored separately: Pain (nine items); Symptoms (seven items); ADL Function (17 items); Sport and Recreation Function (five items); Quality of Life (four items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic assessment scales and generic measures. |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
modified Harris Hip Score for knee
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) score.
The domains covered are pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion.
The pain domain measures pain severity and its effect on activities and need for pain medication.
The function domain consists of daily activities (stair use, using public transportation, sitting, and managing shoes and socks) and gait (limp, support needed, and walking distance).
Deformity takes into account hip flexion, adduction, internal rotation, and extremity length discrepancy.
Range of motion measures hip flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation, and adduction.
There are 10 items.
The score has a maximum of 100 points (best possible outcome) covering pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 5 points).
|
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in IKDC Questionnaire score. The questionnaire looks at 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale helps to evaluate things such as pain, stiffness, swelling and giving-way of the knee. Scores are obtained by summing the individual items, then transforming the crude total to a scaled number that ranges from 0 to 100. This final number is interpreted as a measure of function with higher scores representing higher levels of function The transformed score is interpreted as a measure of function such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms. A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms. |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
WOMAC (for hip and knee)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in WOMAC score. WOMAC score is used to assess patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee using 24 parameters in 5 categories. 1 Pain 2.Stiffness 3.Physical function 4.Social function 5. Emotional function Scoring and Interpretation Response : points none - 0 slight 1 moderate 2 severe 3 extreme 4 score = = summary (points for relevant items) average score = = (total score) / (number of items) Interpretation: minimum total score: 0 maximum total score: 96 minimum pain subscore: 0 maximum pain subscore: 20 minimum stiffness subscore: 0 maximum stiffness subscore: 8 minimum physical function subscore: 0 maximum physical function subscore: 6 |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in DASH score. DASH outcome measure is a 30-item. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items). The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability A minimum score is 30; a maximum is 150. The range of the scores, therefore-from 30 to 150-equals 120. The raw score is then transformed to a zero-to-100 scale with zero reflecting no disability (good function) and 100 reflecting maximum disability. |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
The Constant-Murley score (CMS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in CMS score. CMS is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in the target hip following completion of treatment cycles.
Visual analogue scales (VAS) are psychometric measuring instruments designed to document the characteristics of disease-related symptom severity in individual patients and use this to achieve a rapid (statistically measurable and reproducible) classification of symptom severity and disease control The VAS is a commonly used tool in health outcome studies, when using it to assess importance of certain action or intervention, how we can interpret the results, on 1 to 10 line (where 1; the least and the 10; the highest)
|
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Nature, incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Defined as any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, or diseases that emerge or worsen relative to baseline (i.e., if present upon study entry) during the study regardless of causal relationship. Methods i. Spontaneous subject reports ii. Subject interview by study personnel iii. Clinical examination during face-to-face clinic follow-ups. Defined as any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, or diseases that emerge or worsen relative to baseline (i.e., if present upon study entry) during the study regardless of causal relationship. Methods i. Spontaneous subject reports ii. Subject interview by study personnel iii. Clinical examination during face-to-face clinic follow-ups |
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 24 months (T5)
|
Change in cartilage thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Cartilage thickness on MRI in mm
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Change in cartilage volume
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Cartilage volume on MRI in ml
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Change in cartilage morphology
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Cartilage morphology on MRI.
Change in the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification.
It is based on grading of cartilage lesions, in which lesions are graded 0 to 4 based on depth of the lesion.
Grade 1 and 2 lesions have excellent prognosis.
Grade 2 and 3 lesions may benefit from cartilage debridement or other more conservative surgical measures.
Grade 4 lesions extend into the subchondral bone and may require bone grafting if bony cavitation is extensive
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Change in subchondral bone morphology
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Subchondral bone morphology (i.e.
edema) on MRI
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Inflammation monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle]
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle based on changes of concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β (pg/ml), IL-6 (pg/ml), IL-8 (pg/ml), IL-11 (pg/ml), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (pg/ml)
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle]
|
Inflammation monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle based on changes of concentrations of CD40L (ng/ml)
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Inflammation monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle based on changes of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP ) (mg/dl)
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Inflammation monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle based on changes of miRNA expression (ug/dl) defined on microarray profiling
|
Baseline, and 12 months post-treatment cycle
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marek Postula, MD, PhD, Medical University of Warsaw
- Study Director: Robert Smiegielski, MD, Life Clinic
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 002/LIFE/2019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis
-
Sanford HealthActive, not recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder Osteoarthritis | Ankle Osteoarthritis | Wrist OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
University of EdinburghHospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder OsteoarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
Medical University of WarsawUnknownOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Glenohumeral OsteoarthritisPoland
-
University of California, San FranciscoStanford University; Robert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
University of VermontCompletedOsteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis Of HipUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRoyal Infirmary of EdinburghRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder OsteoarthritisUnited States, United Kingdom
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis
-
University Hospital, LilleCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNewton-Wellesley Hospital; The New England Baptist HospitalCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
West Virginia UniversityAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)WithdrawnKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip OsteoarthritisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Intra-articular injection of ADMSC
-
Dalia Salah SaifUnknownRA - Rheumatoid ArthritisEgypt
-
Istanbul UniversityRecruiting
-
St George's, University of LondonWellcome Trust; Rosetrees TrustUnknownRheumatoid Arthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Psoriatic Arthritis | SpondyloarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleNot yet recruiting
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital TuebingenUnknownJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisGermany
-
Renew Center, San Antonio, TexasCompletedArthritis, Degenerative
-
University of UtahActive, not recruitingPlatelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)United States
-
Bioheart, Inc.Anupam Hospital; RegennMed Research and Therapeutics DelhiCompleted
-
Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.UnknownKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States