The Effectiveness of a Herbal Supplement in Osteoarthritis.

January 27, 2026 updated by: Patrycja Brodka Pedro, Middlesex University

Effectiveness of a Herbal Supplement Containing Boswellia Serrata, Curcuma Longa, and Vitis Vinifera in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined herbal supplement containing Boswellia serrata, Curcuma longa, and Vitis vinifera in adults with clinically diagnosed knee or hip osteoarthritis.

The primary objective is to determine whether the supplement improves osteoarthritis-related symptoms.

The supplement will be compared with a placebo.

Participants will:

  • take the supplement and placebo for 4 weeks each, one at a time;
  • complete validated questionnaires (6 times online)
  • perform three performance-based physical tests (6 times online)
  • provide a urine sample

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, NW4 4BT
        • Recruiting
        • Middlesex Univeristy London
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrycja Brodka Pedro, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lygeri Dimitriou, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Frank Hills, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18
  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis in knee or hip
  • Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4 during the most painful movement in the last 24 hours
  • Lequesne's Functional Index (LFI) score ≥ 7
  • Ambulant patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and breastfeeding
  • Autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus
  • Joint trauma, joint injury, joint infection, meniscus tear, complete loss of articular cartilage
  • Expectation of surgery
  • History of the viscous or corticosteroids injections into affected joints or oral corticosteroids within last 12 months
  • Allergy to one of the intervention's ingredients or NSAIDs
  • Peptic ulceration and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
  • High alcohol intake, inability to abstain from alcohol, substance abuse, history of addiction
  • Tumor, cancer
  • Abnormal renal or/and hepatic functions or altered blood chemistry
  • Use of concomitant medication able to interfere with the interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Treatment
Dietary supplement containing standardised herbal extracts of Boswellia Serrata (525 mg), Curcuma Longa (150 mg), Vitis vinifera (75 mg)
A dietary supplement containing standardised herbal extracts of Boswellia serrata (525 mg), Curcuma longa (150 mg), Vitis vinifera (75 mg). Four times a day.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Dietary supplement placebo containing no standardised herbal extracts or other active ingredients.
A placebo containing no standardised herbal extracts or other active ingredients. Four times a day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, a validated, specialised instrument used to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in people with osteoarthritis. Scores range from 0 to 96 (Likert version), with higher scores indicating worse pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), and physical function (0-68).
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Numeric Rating Scale. A specialised pain assessment tool, where patients rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain knee/hip (ICOAP) score
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
ICOAP. A Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain knee/hip To assess two distinct types of pain experienced by people with osteoarthritis-intermittent pain (comes and goes, 0 - 24) and constant pain (persistent, ongoing pain, 0 - 20). Scores range from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating more severe osteoarthritis related pain.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation

EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire. A generic, widely used tool to measure health-related quality of life. It measures five dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, Anxiety/depression. A score of 1 indicates no problems, while 5 indicates extreme problems in the respective dimension.

In addition, the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (uCTX-II) levels
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
uCTX-II (urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen) is a biochemical marker measured in urine that reflects type II collagen degradation, which occurs primarily in articular cartilage.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Minimal Clinically Important Difference for measured scores
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation

Minimal Clinically Important Difference assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change.

PGIC is a specialised patient-reported outcome tool.

Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
30-Second Chair Stand Test is a functional assessment that measures lower-body strength and endurance by recording the number of times an individual can rise to a full standing position from a seated position in 30 seconds, without using their arms.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
30-Second Chair Stand Test is a functional assessment that measures lower-body strength and endurance by recording the number of times an individual can rise to a full standing position from a seated position in 30 seconds, without using their arms.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in Stair Climb Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Stair Climb Test is a functional performance assessment that measures lower-limb strength, power, and mobility by timing how quickly an individual ascends and descends a set of stairs.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in Stair Climb Test
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Stair Climb Test is a functional performance assessment that measures lower-limb strength, power, and mobility by timing how quickly an individual ascends and descends a set of stairs.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Change in 40-metre Fast-Paced Walk Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
The 40-metre Fast-Paced Walk Test (4 × 10 m) is a functional mobility assessment that measures walking speed and dynamic balance by timing how quickly an individual completes four 10-metre walks at a fast but safe pace.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in the 40-metre Fast-Paced Walk Test (4 × 10 m)
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
The 40-metre Fast-Paced Walk Test (4 × 10 m) is a functional mobility assessment that measures walking speed and dynamic balance by timing how quickly an individual completes four 10-metre walks at a fast but safe pace.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
The GPAQ will be used to monitor physical activity patterns in participants, and detect possible changes.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Adverse events
Time Frame: The length of intervention: 4 weeks
Collection of adverse events to assess the safety and tolerability of the supplement
The length of intervention: 4 weeks
Rescue medication
Time Frame: The length of intervention: 4 weeks
The use of rescue medication
The length of intervention: 4 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, a validated, specialised instrument used to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in people with osteoarthritis. Scores range from 0 to 96 (Likert version), with higher scores indicating worse pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), and physical function (0-68).
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Numeric Rating Scale. A specialised pain assessment tool, where patients rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain; higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain knee/hip (ICOAP) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
ICOAP. A Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain knee/hip To assess two distinct types of pain experienced by people with osteoarthritis-intermittent pain (comes and goes, 0 - 24) and constant pain (persistent, ongoing pain, 0 - 20). Scores range from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating more severe osteoarthritis related pain.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in Lequesne Functional Index (LFI) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Lequesne Functional Index. A specialised questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of osteoarthritis and its impact on daily function, particularly for the hip and knee. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity and worse functional impairment.
Change from baseline to the end of Week 1 of supplementation
Change in Lequesne Functional Index (LFI) score
Time Frame: Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation
Lequesne Functional Index. A specialised questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of osteoarthritis and its impact on daily function, particularly for the hip and knee. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity and worse functional impairment.
Change from the start of the intervention to Week 4 of supplementation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with remotely controlled study
Time Frame: At the end of the study: 12 weeks
Participants will be asked to complete a remote study satisfaction survey
At the end of the study: 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Active treatment

Subscribe