Evaluating the Use of an App in Pleural Disease: Algorithm-supported Clinical Decision Making Versus Usual Care (APPLAUS)

June 1, 2026 updated by: Uffe Bodtger, Zealand University Hospital

Evaluating the Use of an App in Pleural Disease: Algorithm-supported Clinical Decision Making Versus Usual Care: a Multicentre, Stepped-wedge Cluster-randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Number of Days in Hospital.

Pleural disease is a group of conditions that affect the membrane around the lungs. These conditions-fluid around the lungs, infections, cancer, and collapsed lung-are common and can cause serious illness. They often lead to long hospital stays, emergency admissions, and reduced quality of life. In Denmark and worldwide, the number of patients with pleural disease is rising, and the treatment is costly for the healthcare system.

How long patients stay in the hospital depends on the type of pleural disease. Some stay less than a week, while others remain for several weeks, especially if complications occur. Research shows that early diagnosis and treatment based on clinical guidelines can shorten hospital stays and improve outcomes.

In the UK, many hospitals have created dedicated pleural clinics run by specialists. These clinics help ensure that patients receive fast, consistent, and evidence based care, and they have reduced the number of days patients spend in hospital. In Denmark, however, such clinics are rare. A recent national survey showed that many Danish hospitals do not follow current pleural disease guidelines, and many lack clear pathways for diagnosing and treating these patients. As a result, patients may receive suboptimal care.

This project aims to close that gap. The goal is to develop an easy to use, guideline based decision tool that supports doctors in emergency, medical, and surgical departments. The tool will guide clinicians from the moment a patient arrives until discharge, helping them choose the right tests and treatments at the right time. By making expert knowledge accessible to non specialists, the project hopes to improve patient care, reduce complications, and shorten hospital stays.

Ultimately, the project seeks to ensure that all patients with pleural disease in Denmark receive fast, safe, and evidence based treatment-no matter where they are admitted.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

828

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Aalborg University Hospital
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Amager, Denmark, 2300
        • Amager Hospital
      • Esbjerg, Denmark, 6700
        • Esbjerg Hospital
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
        • North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød
      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Hvidovre Hospital
      • Kolding, Denmark, 6000
        • Kolding Hospital
      • Køge, Denmark, 4600
        • Zealand University Hospital, Køge
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Slagelse, Denmark, 4200
        • Slagelse Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

One or more of the following, relevante ICD-10 codes for either spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection.

Spontaneous pneumothorax:

  • DJ93
  • DJ930
  • DJ931
  • DJ938
  • DJ939

Pleural effusion:

  • DJ90
  • DJ909
  • DJ919
  • DJ91
  • DJ940
  • DJ948
  • DJ948A
  • DJ949
  • DC782

Pleural infection:

  • DJ86
  • DJ860
  • DJ860

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic pneumothorax (including iatrogenic pneumothorax)
  • Hemothorax

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual care

Usual provided care for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection.

All clusters begin in this condition before transitioning to the intervention as part of the stepped-wedge schedule.

Care supported by a clinical decision-support tool delivered via a smartphone app.
Experimental: Clinical decision-making support tool
Care supported by the clinical decision-making app. Clusters transition to this condition at predefined time points according to the stepped-wedge design.
Care for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pleural infection when supported by a clinical decision-support tool, in the form of a smartphone app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay (days)
Time Frame: From hospital admission through hospital discharge (up to 90 days)
Number of days from hospital admission to hospital discharge.
From hospital admission through hospital discharge (up to 90 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correct pneumothorax subtype classification
Time Frame: During index hospital admission (up to 90 days after admission)
Whether the pneumothorax subtype was correctly classified during the index hospital admission according to predefined diagnostic criteria (yes/no).
During index hospital admission (up to 90 days after admission)
Number of participants receiving each initial pneumothorax management strategy
Time Frame: Within 24 hours from hospital admission
Number of participants managed with either conservative care, needle aspiration, chest tube insertion, or ambulatory device insertion
Within 24 hours from hospital admission
Chest tube size
Time Frame: Periprocedural.
Diameter of chest tube used for treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, reported in French units (Fr).
Periprocedural.
Number of participants with persistent air leak (>7 days)
Time Frame: From chest tube insertion until resolution of air leak or up to 90 days
Number of participants with ongoing air leak through the chest drainage system for more than 7 days after chest tube insertion (yes/no)
From chest tube insertion until resolution of air leak or up to 90 days
Number of participants undergoing high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)
Time Frame: During index hospital admission
Number of participants who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) during hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge, recorded as yes/no
During index hospital admission
Number of participants receiving complete recommended diagnostic work-up for unilateral pleural effusion
Time Frame: At end of index hospital admission (up to 90 days).
Assessment of whether recommended blood tests (full blood count, C-reactive protein, renal function tests, liver function tests, and albumin) and pleural fluid analyses (pH or glucose, LDH, leukocyte differential count, microbiology culture and sensitivity analysis, and cytology) were performed in participants with unilateral pleural effusion.
At end of index hospital admission (up to 90 days).
Chest tube size
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Chest tube size (French gauge, Fr) used for pleural effusion drainage
Periprocedural
Definitive cause for pleural effusion
Time Frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.
Was a definitive cause for the cause of pleural effusion established.
During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.
Definitive pleural procedure
Time Frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.
Definitive pleural procedure within 90 days of admission due to pleural effusion.
During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.
Number of participants receiving complete recommended diagnostic work-up for suspected pleural infection
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Assessment of whether recommended blood tests (full blood count, C-reactive protein, renal function tests, liver function tests, and albumin) and pleural fluid analyses (pH or glucose, LDH, leukocyte differential count, microbiology culture and sensitivity analysis, and cytology) were performed in participants with suspected pleural infection.
Up to 90 days
Chest tube diameter of chest tubes used for pleural infection.
Time Frame: Periprocedural.
Diameter of chest tube used for drainage of pleural infection, reported in French units (Fr).
Periprocedural.
Number of participants receiving intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) for pleural infection.
Time Frame: Up to 90 days.
Assessment of whether intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) was administered in participants with pleural infection despite chest tube drainage.
Up to 90 days.
Length of antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.
Total length of antibiotic treatment (both intravenously and orally) for pleural infection.
During hospital admission or within 90 days after discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Casper Jensen, MD, Lungemedicinsk Forskningsenhed (PLUZ), Institut for Regional Sundhedsforskning, Syddansk Universitet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • p-2024-17577

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pleural Diseases

Clinical Trials on Usual care

Subscribe