Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of the Pleura as a Supplement to Extraction of Fluid in Patients With One-sided Fluid in the Pleura

September 23, 2020 updated by: Naestved Hospital

Ultrasound-guided Pleural Biopsy as a Supplement to Thoracentesis: A Randomised Study

The research group will investigate the diagnostic effect of early introduction of ultrasound guided pleural biopsy in the work-up of patients with one-sided pleural effusion, suspected of malignant pleural effusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with unilateral pleural effusion with high protein content (exudative pleural effusion) are likely to have malignant pleural effusion. In the Danish guidelines, patient undergo two thoracentesis before more invasive procedures, due to the relatively low incidens of pleural TB and mesothelioma. The aim of the research group is to investigate the effect of early introduction of ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy taken at the optimal sport for thoracentesis. The research group will randomise half of our patients with unilateral pleural exudate to up-front ultrasound-guided biopsy and the other half usual care eg. a second thoracentesis, to see if there is a benefit of early pleural biopsy in the work-up of patients with unilateral pleural effusion, suspected of malignant pleural effusion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Region Sjælland
      • Næstved, Region Sjælland, Denmark, 4700
        • Næstved Sygehus, department of pulmonary medicine
    • Zealand
      • Roskilde, Zealand, Denmark, 4000
        • Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Department of Pulmonary medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients with a previous thoracentesis of a unilateral exudative pleural effusion according to Light's criteria (1) without malignant cells.
  • CT thorax or PET-CT with contrast performed.
  • Clinical suspicion of cancer such as (but not limited to) weight loss or PET-CT results or former cancer diagnosis.
  • Patients must be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral pleural effusions.
  • Known cause of pleural effusions.
  • Life expectancy <3 months.
  • Inability to understand written or spoken Danish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis
Ultrasound guided thoracentesis
The optimal point of entry (the largest distance between parietal and visceral pleura) is identified using ultrasound. This is usually on the lower, dorsal side of the chest. Local anesthesia is obtained with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine with adrenalin injected in cutis, subcutis, muscle and pleura. Before removing the syringe, aspiration of pleural fluid confirms the relevance of the chosen site. The area is wiped with disinfectant and a millimeter skin incision is made with a pointed scalpel. A 7 French (or up to 16 French, to the choice of the clinician) pigtail catheter is inserted and connected to sealed bag. Fluid is aspirated via a 3-way valve, and transferred to relevant bottles for culture, analysis of albumin and LDH, protein, and for cytology.
Experimental: Ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy and thoracentesis
Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the parietal pleura is taken through the same incision as the optimal site for thoracentesis and immediately prior to ultrasound-guided thoracentesis
The optimal point of entry (the largest distance between parietal and visceral pleura) is identified using ultrasound. This is usually on the lower, dorsal side of the chest. Local anesthesia is obtained with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine with adrenalin injected in cutis, subcutis, muscle and pleura. Before removing the syringe, aspiration of pleural fluid confirms the relevance of the chosen site. The area is wiped with disinfectant and a millimeter skin incision is made with a pointed scalpel. A 7 French (or up to 16 French, to the choice of the clinician) pigtail catheter is inserted and connected to sealed bag. Fluid is aspirated via a 3-way valve, and transferred to relevant bottles for culture, analysis of albumin and LDH, protein, and for cytology.
Using ultrasound the optimal point of entry for thoracentesis is located. Local anesthesia is obtained with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine with adrenalin injected in cutis, subcutis, muscle and pleura. Before removing the syringe, aspiration of pleural fluid confirms the relevance of the chosen site . Again, the area is wiped with disinfectant and a millimeter small skin incision is made with a pointed scalpel. Six US-guided biopsies of 1.2 millimetres using closed needle biopsies (Quick-core Biopsy Needle 18G, COOK Medical, Bloomington, Indiana, USA or Bard Max Core needle 18G, Temple, Arizona, USA). ) are taken from the parietal pleura. Thoracentesis is performed as described above using the same incision as the pleural biopsy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of cases with conclusive pleural workup to provide and plan treatment in patients diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
Our primary endpoint includes both patients who will receive palliative care and patients who will receive active treatment. For patients receiving palliative care, the presence of malignant cells is sufficient. However, for patients receiving active treatment, the primary endpoint is defined as a definite and treatment-guiding pathological result (immunohistochemistry, mutations, oncodrivers, culture and biochemistry) as decided by a multidisciplinary team conference.
26 weeks post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of cases achieving pleural immunohistochemistry, mutations, oncodrivers and culture.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
Difference in diagnostic yield between Arm A and Arm B, including subgroup analysis of MPE.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
Sensitivity of ultrasound-guided closed needle biopsy of parietal pleura for diagnosing malignancy and all causes of PE.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
Time from inclusion to conclusive, treatment-guiding diagnoses in patients with MPE.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
The negative likelihood ratio of additional ultrasound-guided closed needle biopsy of parietal pleura in aspect of MPE.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
Proportion of true non-malignant PE at end of follow-up.
Time Frame: 26 weeks post randomization
26 weeks post randomization
Complications to pleural procedures
Time Frame: Day 1 (1 hour after the end of procedure), 7 days and 30 days post-procedure
mortality, pneumothorax, haemoptysis, local bleeding, infections and hospital admissions
Day 1 (1 hour after the end of procedure), 7 days and 30 days post-procedure
Mean volume pleural fluid drained during thoracentesis
Time Frame: Day 1 within 30 minutes after the end of procedure
measured in mL
Day 1 within 30 minutes after the end of procedure
Patient reported discomfort and health
Time Frame: Day 1within 30 minutes after the end of procedure and 7 days post-procedure
measured by 5Q-5D-5L (2009 EuroQol Group EQ-5D™ Danish version).
Day 1within 30 minutes after the end of procedure and 7 days post-procedure
Patient reported discomfort and health
Time Frame: Day 1 (immediately before procedure and within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 7 days post-procedure
Measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), scale 1-10, 0 being no symptoms, 10 being the worse symptoms
Day 1 (immediately before procedure and within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 7 days post-procedure
Patient reported cough
Time Frame: Day 1(immediately before procedure and within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 7 days post-procedure
VAS score (visual analogue scale) for cough, 0-10, 0 being no cough, 10 being the worse cough
Day 1(immediately before procedure and within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 7 days post-procedure
Pain during procedure
Time Frame: Day 1(within 30 minutes after the end of procedure)
Measured by VAS score (visual analogue scale) for pain, 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being the worse pain
Day 1(within 30 minutes after the end of procedure)
Willingness to repeat the procedure
Time Frame: day og procedure (within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 1 week post-procedure
Measured by 5-point Likert scale,scale 1-5, 1 being definitely willing to have the procedure again, 5 being definitely not willing to have the procedure performed again
day og procedure (within 30 minutes after the end of procedure) and 1 week post-procedure
Change in patient reported discomfort
Time Frame: Day 1 within 30 minutes after the end of procedure
iMeasured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and VAS score (visual analogue scale) for cough
Day 1 within 30 minutes after the end of procedure
Changes in patient reported discomfort and health
Time Frame: 7 days post-procedure
Measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and VAS score (visual analogue scale) for cough and health measured by 5Q-5D-5L (2009 EuroQol Group EQ-5D™ Danish version).
7 days post-procedure
Number of thoracenteses in these 7 days besides the study procedure.
Time Frame: 7 days post-procedure
7 days post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Uffe Bødtger, MD, PhD,, Department of Respiratory Medicine; Naestved Hospital, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Pleural Effusion

Clinical Trials on Thoracentesis

Subscribe