F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Versus Ultrasound- Guided Intra-articular Injections in Chronic Low Backache (PET-FACET)

F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Pain Palliation in Chronic Low Backache : Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound - Guided Vs PET/CT Guided Intra-articular Injections of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic.

The goal of this open-label randomized controlled trial explored the efficacy of ultrasound guided versus F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT guided local anesthetic and steroid injections in managing chronic low back pain caused by lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint arthritis.. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. To Compare the reduction in pain intensity between PET/CT guided and Ultrasound Guided facet joint injections using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at predefined follow up intervals.
  2. To compare functional improvement and disability outcomes between two study arms using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS).
  3. To compare association of PET/CT associated parameters with post intervention clinical response associated parameters.

Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. Randomization will be conducted using a computer-generated random sequence, ensuring a 1:1 allocation ratio between the two treatment groups

  1. Group A: Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection.
  2. Group B: Patients receiving Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chandigarh
      • Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a chronic nociceptive low backache attending the orthopaedic department who do not get adequate relief with conservative treatments for more than three months will be recruited in the study.
  • Patients who are ready to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Patients with active infection and febrile illness
  • Patients with acute spine trauma
  • Spinal pathologies requiring surgical interventions such as significant spinal stenosis , spondylolisthesis or disc herniation.
  • Patients with corticosteroid injection within six weeks before the study
  • Patients who refused to give written informed consent
  • MRI showing the neuropathic cause or nerve root compression
  • Patients with deranged coagulation profile
  • Systemic conditions affecting joints (eg ankylosing spondylitis , rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: F-18 Sodium Fluoride Guided intra-articular Injection
Patients in this group will PET/CT guided intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided Pain Palliation
Patients in this group will undergo ultrasound-guided (USG) intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
Change in pain intensity from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate less pain.
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
Change in disability from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is scored from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and poorer functional status. Lower scores indicate improvement in disability.
From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
Change in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Time Frame: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks
Change in functional outcome from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). The LBOS ranges from 0 to 75 points, with higher scores indicating better functional outcome and lower levels of disability. Higher scores indicate improvement in functional status.
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in pain severity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 points). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up VAS scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in disability assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100%). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up ODI scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in functional outcome assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS; 0-75 points). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up LBOS scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on intra-articular injection

Subscribe