- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07632508
F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Versus Ultrasound- Guided Intra-articular Injections in Chronic Low Backache (PET-FACET)
F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Pain Palliation in Chronic Low Backache : Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound - Guided Vs PET/CT Guided Intra-articular Injections of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic.
The goal of this open-label randomized controlled trial explored the efficacy of ultrasound guided versus F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT guided local anesthetic and steroid injections in managing chronic low back pain caused by lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint arthritis.. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- To Compare the reduction in pain intensity between PET/CT guided and Ultrasound Guided facet joint injections using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at predefined follow up intervals.
- To compare functional improvement and disability outcomes between two study arms using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS).
- To compare association of PET/CT associated parameters with post intervention clinical response associated parameters.
Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. Randomization will be conducted using a computer-generated random sequence, ensuring a 1:1 allocation ratio between the two treatment groups
- Group A: Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection.
- Group B: Patients receiving Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Chandigarh
-
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India, 160012
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a chronic nociceptive low backache attending the orthopaedic department who do not get adequate relief with conservative treatments for more than three months will be recruited in the study.
- Patients who are ready to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with active infection and febrile illness
- Patients with acute spine trauma
- Spinal pathologies requiring surgical interventions such as significant spinal stenosis , spondylolisthesis or disc herniation.
- Patients with corticosteroid injection within six weeks before the study
- Patients who refused to give written informed consent
- MRI showing the neuropathic cause or nerve root compression
- Patients with deranged coagulation profile
- Systemic conditions affecting joints (eg ankylosing spondylitis , rheumatoid arthritis)
- Uncontrolled diabetes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: F-18 Sodium Fluoride Guided intra-articular Injection
Patients in this group will PET/CT guided intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
|
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided Pain Palliation
Patients in this group will undergo ultrasound-guided (USG) intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
|
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
|
Change in pain intensity from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The VAS is a 10-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Lower scores indicate less pain.
|
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
|
|
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
|
Change in disability from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
The ODI is scored from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and poorer functional status.
Lower scores indicate improvement in disability.
|
From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
|
|
Change in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Time Frame: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks
|
Change in functional outcome from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS).
The LBOS ranges from 0 to 75 points, with higher scores indicating better functional outcome and lower levels of disability.
Higher scores indicate improvement in functional status.
|
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in pain severity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 points).
Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up VAS scores.
Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
|
From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
|
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in disability assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100%).
Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up ODI scores.
Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
|
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
|
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Time Frame: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in functional outcome assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS; 0-75 points).
Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up LBOS scores.
Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
|
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- INT/IEC/2025/SPL-1127
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiHacettepe University; Selcuk UniversityRecruitingLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
University of BarcelonaHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRecruitingBack Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)Spain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisRecruitingBack Pain | Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Back Pain Lower Back ChronicBrazil
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityCompletedMindfulness Meditation | Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Xijing HospitalRecruitingLow Back Pain | Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain | CLBP - Chronic Low Back Pain | Paraspinal MuscleChina
-
Rhode Island HospitalRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low-back PainUnited States
-
Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain...Neurolumen LLCNot yet recruitingChronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain
Clinical Trials on intra-articular injection
-
Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhDNot yet recruitingAdhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder | Intra Articular Injection
-
Lincoln University CollegeNot yet recruitingKnee OsteoarthritisPakistan
-
Dalia Salah SaifUnknownRA - Rheumatoid ArthritisEgypt
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiCompletedHip Pain Chronic | Osteoarthritis, HipTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne...Fondation ApicilRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisFrance
-
Avidence TherapeuticsRecruitingOsteoarthritis of the KneeAustralia
-
St George's, University of LondonWellcome Trust; Rosetrees TrustUnknownRheumatoid Arthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Psoriatic Arthritis | SpondyloarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital TuebingenUnknownJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisGermany