Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Versus Ultrasound- Guided Intra-articular Injections in Chronic Low Backache (PET-FACET)

2 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Rajender Kumar, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Guided Pain Palliation in Chronic Low Backache : Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound - Guided Vs PET/CT Guided Intra-articular Injections of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic.

The goal of this open-label randomized controlled trial explored the efficacy of ultrasound guided versus F-18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT guided local anesthetic and steroid injections in managing chronic low back pain caused by lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint arthritis.. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. To Compare the reduction in pain intensity between PET/CT guided and Ultrasound Guided facet joint injections using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at predefined follow up intervals.
  2. To compare functional improvement and disability outcomes between two study arms using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS).
  3. To compare association of PET/CT associated parameters with post intervention clinical response associated parameters.

Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. Randomization will be conducted using a computer-generated random sequence, ensuring a 1:1 allocation ratio between the two treatment groups

  1. Group A: Patients receiving F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection.
  2. Group B: Patients receiving Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid plus local anesthetic injection

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

40

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Inde
    • Chandigarh
      • Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Inde, 160012
        • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a chronic nociceptive low backache attending the orthopaedic department who do not get adequate relief with conservative treatments for more than three months will be recruited in the study.
  • Patients who are ready to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Patients with active infection and febrile illness
  • Patients with acute spine trauma
  • Spinal pathologies requiring surgical interventions such as significant spinal stenosis , spondylolisthesis or disc herniation.
  • Patients with corticosteroid injection within six weeks before the study
  • Patients who refused to give written informed consent
  • MRI showing the neuropathic cause or nerve root compression
  • Patients with deranged coagulation profile
  • Systemic conditions affecting joints (eg ankylosing spondylitis , rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: F-18 Sodium Fluoride Guided intra-articular Injection
Patients in this group will PET/CT guided intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
Procédure: intra-articular injection
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
Procédure: intra-articular injection
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
Comparateur actif: Ultrasound Guided Pain Palliation
Patients in this group will undergo ultrasound-guided (USG) intra articular block of the facet joint or sacroiliac joint using local anesthetic and corticosteroid
Procédure: intra-articular injection
• A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required
Procédure: intra-articular injection
A combination of steroids (80 mg methylprednisolone acetate) and 0.5% bupivacaine will be injected into the intra-articular and periarticular regions of the targeted LFJ(lumbar facet Joint) or SIJ(sacroiliac Joint) under ultrasound(USG) guidance, with doses equally divided for multiple joints, if required

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Délai: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
Change in pain intensity from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate less pain.
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Délai: From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
Change in disability from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The ODI is scored from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and poorer functional status. Lower scores indicate improvement in disability.
From date of intervention to the follow up at 20 weeks
Change in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Délai: From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks
Change in functional outcome from baseline to follow-up as measured using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). The LBOS ranges from 0 to 75 points, with higher scores indicating better functional outcome and lower levels of disability. Higher scores indicate improvement in functional status.
From date of intervention to follow up at 20 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Délai: From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in pain severity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 points). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up VAS scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 Sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Délai: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in disability assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100%). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up ODI scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline SUVmax and improvement in Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS)
Délai: From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks
Correlation between baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on PET/CT and change in functional outcome assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS; 0-75 points). Improvement will be calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up LBOS scores. Correlation analysis will be performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as appropriate.
From baseline F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT to follow up PET/CT and clinical assessment at 20 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

14 mai 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

25 mai 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

25 mai 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

27 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

8 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

8 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • INT/IEC/2025/SPL-1127

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner