A Phase 2b Trial of Lesion Network Mapping-Guided cTBS for Motor Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke (MASTRE-2)

June 9, 2026 updated by: Zi-Xiao Li, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Lesion Network Mapping-Navigated Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Multicentre Phase 2b Trial: MASTRE-2

This Phase 2b study will evaluate whether lesion network mapping-guided continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can improve recovery after acute ischemic stroke. The treatment uses each participant's brain imaging to identify individualized stimulation targets related to stroke symptoms. Participants will receive either active cTBS or a sham procedure in addition to standard stroke care. The study will assess the efficacy and safety of this personalized brain stimulation approach and support planning for future confirmatory trials.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Acute ischemic stroke can lead to persistent motor impairment despite standard medical treatment and rehabilitation. The early post-stroke period may provide an important window for modulating brain network plasticity and supporting functional recovery. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a patterned form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can modulate cortical excitability over a short stimulation period and may enhance recovery when applied to clinically relevant motor networks.

This Phase 2b study evaluates a personalized neuromodulation approach based on lesion network mapping. For each participant, the acute infarct lesion is identified on clinical brain imaging and mapped to a reference functional connectome to estimate lesion-associated brain networks. Candidate stimulation targets are selected from symptom-relevant cortical network nodes, with consideration of accessibility, safety, and electric-field modeling. Neuronavigation is used to guide coil placement and maintain targeting accuracy during treatment.

Active treatment consists of lesion network mapping-guided cTBS delivered to individualized cortical targets using a figure-8 coil under neuronavigation. Sham stimulation follows the same imaging-based target selection, electric-field modeling, positioning, and procedural workflow, but uses a sham coil designed to mimic the sensory and acoustic features of stimulation without delivering a therapeutic magnetic field. This approach is intended to maintain blinding of participants and outcome assessors while isolating the effect of active stimulation.

The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of individualized lesion network mapping-guided cTBS for recovery after acute ischemic stroke and to inform the design of future confirmatory trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80 years.
  2. Ischemic stroke onset within the past 14 days.
  3. Unilateral, supratentorial ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI.
  4. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1.
  5. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score 6-25, with item 1a ≤ 1 point, and at least one of items 5a, 5b, 6a, or 6b ≥ 2 points.
  6. Written informed consent signed by the patient or the patient's legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to TMS (e.g. cranial metallic foreign bodies, cardiac pacemaker, implanted drug pump, cochlear implant).
  2. History of epilepsy or seizure, intracranial hypertension, tumor, or other serious neurological disease.
  3. Midline shift or parenchymal mass effect on cranial CT or other imaging.
  4. CT or MRI evidence of bilateral acute cerebral infarction or infratentorial acute infarction (brainstem or cerebellum).
  5. Evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage, including spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, intraventricular hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  6. Pre-stroke mRS ≥ 2.
  7. Systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg despite antihypertensive treatment.
  8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning pregnancy within 90 days.
  9. Severe psychiatric disorders or dementia (or other conditions) precluding informed consent or follow-up.
  10. Concomitant malignant tumor or severe systemic disease with life expectancy < 90 days.
  11. Participation in any other interventional clinical study within 30 days before randomization, or currently enrolled in such a study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LNM-navigated cTBS group
Patients receive two daily sessions for 7 consecutive days. Each session uses a figure-8 coil under neuronavigation to deliver 3-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz (continuous theta burst) for a total of 600 pulses in 40 seconds per target. Targets are individualized via lesion network mapping of the patient's acute infarct, selecting symptom-relevant network nodes. Stimulus intensity is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold.
Individualized treatment targets are defined by outlining lesion areas on each patient's MRI and projecting them onto a normative functional connectivity map to identify symptom-specific connectivity disruptions within sensorimotor regions. Twice-daily treatments, administered over seven consecutive days, employ an "8"-shaped coil guided by neuronavigation for real-time targeting. For each target, a 40-second session delivers 600 pulses at an intensity of 80% of each participant's resting motor threshold (RMT), administered as 3-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated at a theta frequency of 5 Hz.
Sham Comparator: Sham cTBS group
Procedures mimic the active group in coil positioning, timing, navigation, acoustic noise, and session schedule, but use a sham coil that produces no effective magnetic field.
Sham LNM-navigated cTBS follows the identical workflow, including MRI-based lesion mapping, target selection, electric-field modeling, and neuronavigation, but uses a sham figure-8 coil that mimics the sound and sensation of stimulation without generating a significant magnetic field. Participants receive two sham treatment sessions per day for seven consecutive days. Each session follows the same 40-second protocol timing and coil positioning as the active intervention, ensuring that participants and assessors remain blinded while no effective pulses are delivered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-2
Time Frame: Day 90 post-randomization
Day 90 post-randomization
Proportion experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Within 90 days post-randomization
Proportion experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs), including seizures
Within 90 days post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distribution shift in mRS scores
Time Frame: Day 90 post-randomization
Day 90 post-randomization
Proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-1
Time Frame: Day 90 post-randomization
Day 90 post-randomization
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score
Time Frame: Day 7 post-randomization
Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score from baseline to 7 days post-randomization.
Day 7 post-randomization
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score
Time Frame: Day 7 post-randomization
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score from baseline to 7 days post-randomization.
Day 7 post-randomization
Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living score
Time Frame: Day 90 post-randomization
Day 90 post-randomization
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Day 90 post-randomization
EuroQol five-dimensional five-level health questionnaire
Day 90 post-randomization
Early neurological deterioration
Time Frame: 7 days post-randomisation
Proportion of patients with neurological deterioration (defined as a ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score) within 7 days post-randomisation.
7 days post-randomisation
Proportion of participants with insomnia
Time Frame: Within 7 days after randomization.
The proportion of participants with insomnia reported within 7 days after randomization.
Within 7 days after randomization.
Proportion of participants with headache
Time Frame: Within 7 days after randomization;
The proportion of participants with headache reported within 7 days after randomization;
Within 7 days after randomization;
Proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: Within 7 days after randomization.
The proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage reported within 7 days after randomization.
Within 7 days after randomization.
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Within 90 days post-randomization
Proportion of patients who died from any cause
Within 90 days post-randomization
Proportion with symptomatic stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
Time Frame: Within 90 days post-randomization
Within 90 days post-randomization
Any Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Within 90 days post-randomization
Proportion experiencing any adverse events
Within 90 days post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on LNM-navigated cTBS

Subscribe