AI-assisted Rare Disease Diagnosis

July 24, 2026 updated by: Shuyang Zhang, MD, PhD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of LLM-Assisted Diagnostic Support in Patients With Suspected Rare or Diagnostically Unresolved Disease

A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating whether a rare-disease diagnostic large language model can improve diagnostic quality, efficiency, and health-economic outcomes for physicians managing patients with suspected rare or diagnostically unresolved disease.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rare disease patients commonly experience prolonged diagnostic odysseys rooted in limited rare disease recognition, phenotypic heterogeneity, and dispersed diagnostic clues. Diagnostic decision-support large language models may improve first-visit consultations by integrating prior records, generating structured analyses, and proposing candidate diagnoses, thereby shortening diagnostic pathways and improving appropriate genetic testing referral.

Participating physicians will provide care under both AI-assisted and standard diagnostic workflows. Eligible patients will be individually randomised to receive either AI-assisted diagnostic support or standard clinical practice.

In the intervention arm, physicians will have diagnostic support from AI when seeing patients. In the control arm, patients are seen under standard hospital workflow without any generative AI tools. Outcomes adjudicated by an independent Expert Committee blinded to arm assignment; adjudicators access no AI-generated materials.

A prospective within-trial economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the randomized trial. Healthcare resource use and costs associated with the diagnostic pathway will be collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1056

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Cangzhou, China
        • Cangzhou Central Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Changchun, China
        • Changchun Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Dongguan, China
        • Dongguan People's Hospital
      • Foshan, China
        • First People's Hospital of Foshan
      • Guiyang, China
        • Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
      • Jilin City, China
        • Jilin Central General Hospital
      • Kunming, China
        • The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province
      • Tianjin, China
        • Tianjin Children's Hospital
      • Tianshui, China
        • Tianshui 407 Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Wuhai, China
        • Wuhai People's Hospital
      • Xining, China
        • Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital
      • Zhangzhou, China
        • Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any age. Legal guardian co-signs consent for minors or individuals lacking legal capacity.
  • Diagnostically unresolved or suspected rare disease, with at least one prior complete clinical evaluation at a secondary-level or higher institution yielding no confirmed explanatory diagnosis.
  • First presentation to the enrolling institution for the current condition, with no prior records in the institutional HIS or outpatient system.
  • No prior genetic testing related to the current condition; no results or reports available.
  • Written informed consent provided voluntarily by patient or legal guardian, with commitment and ability to complete structured follow-up.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis (clinical, pathological, or molecular) explaining the primary symptoms.
  • Emergency presentation, critical illness, or any condition incompatible with trial participation.
  • Neither patient nor legally authorised proxy able to complete follow-up.
  • Concurrent enrollment in another interventional study with diagnostic accuracy or genetic testing yield as a primary endpoint.
  • Prior use of another AI system has already yielded a confirmed diagnosis for the current condition.

Physician Inclusion Criteria

  • Licensed physician in internal medicine, neurology, pediatrics, general medicine, rare disease, or a related specialty.
  • ≥2 years of clinical practice; competent to manage rare disease patients; stratified into junior or senior tier.
  • Voluntary participation with written informed consent.

Physician Exclusion Criteria

  • No longer in clinical practice, or unable to fulfill required outpatient duties during the study period.
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent or to permit protocol-required collection of consultation and questionnaire data.
  • Currently enrolled in another AI-assisted clinical workflow, or expected to be unable to comply with the procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AI system
AI system will be used to provide diagnostic support during the encounter in addition to conventional clinical workflow. Use of other generative AI tools is prohibited.
The study AI system will be used to provide diagnostic support during the clinical encounter, including structuring relevant clinical information, generating a clinical analysis, and suggesting candidate diagnoses for review by the treating physician.
No Intervention: Standard of care
The physician conducts the encounter per standard hospital workflow using conventional clinical resources only. Use of any generative AI tool is prohibited.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Correct Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.
The proportion of all randomised patients whose clinical diagnosis by the end of follow-up is concordant with the blinded-adjudicated final reference diagnosis determined by an independent committee.
From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician-Reported Experience
Time Frame: Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.
Physicians will assess their experience of the diagnostic workflow. Responses will be recorded using a standardized rating scale (range 1-5, where higher scores indicate more positive experience).
Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.
Patient-Reported Experience
Time Frame: Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.
Patients will assess their experience of the diagnostic workflow. Responses will be recorded using a standardized rating scale (range 1-5, where higher scores indicate more positive experience).
Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.
Appropriate Genetic Testing Recommendation Rate
Time Frame: From the initial consultation to genetic testing indication adjudication, approximately 8 weeks
The proportion of randomized patients for whom physician-recommended genetic testing is concordant with the indication determined by an independent genetics adjudication committee.
From the initial consultation to genetic testing indication adjudication, approximately 8 weeks
Candidate Diagnostic Accuracy
Time Frame: From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.
The agreement between physician-provided candidate diagnoses in the the initial consultation and the independently adjudicated reference diagnosis.
From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.
Molecular Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.
The proportion of all randomized patients in whom genetic testing performed as part of the clinical diagnostic pathway identifies a clinically relevant molecular finding that is confirmed through independent genetics review.
From the first visit to final reference diagnosis adjudication, an average of 8 weeks.
Time to a Correct Diagnosis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up, up to 8 weeks.
The number of days from the first study visit to the first physician-assigned diagnosis that is subsequently confirmed as concordant with the independently adjudicated reference diagnosis.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up, up to 8 weeks.
Duration of the Initial Physician Consultation
Time Frame: Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.
In-room consultation time will be recorded, measured, and compared between arms.
Assessed at each consultation (day 1), within 1 day.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rare Diseases

Clinical Trials on AI system

Subscribe