- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07661199
Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis (STASS)
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether microdecompression alone is as effective as decompression with extension of fusion surgery in patients with symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after previous lumbar fusion surgery.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is microdecompression alone non-inferior to decompression with extension of fusion in improving disability 24 months after surgery, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)? Does microdecompression alone result in similar or lower rates of complications, reoperations, pain, and radiological progression compared with decompression and fusion?
Researchers will compare microdecompression alone to decompression with extension of lumbar fusion to determine whether the less invasive procedure can achieve similar clinical outcomes while reducing surgical burden and preserving spinal structures.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: microdecompression alone or decompression with extension of lumbar fusion.
Undergo the assigned surgical treatment. Attend clinical and radiological follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.
Complete questionnaires assessing disability, pain, quality of life, sleep quality, and mental health.
Undergo routine imaging and clinical examinations to evaluate treatment outcomes and possible complications.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Anton Früh, PD MD M.Sc.
- Phone Number: +49 030 450 660 376
- Email: anton.frueh@charite.de
Study Locations
-
-
State of Berlin
-
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany, 10117
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between 30% and 80% at screening.
- Symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis following degenerative lumbar fusion surgery.
- Persistent symptoms despite at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment.
- Radiological evidence of adjacent segment spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Ability to understand the study procedures and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Adjacent segment kyphosis or scoliosis greater than 10 degrees.
- Screw loosening or pseudarthrosis of the previous fusion construct.
- Known current pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Acute traumatic spinal injury or fracture.
- Active inflammatory disease of the spine.
- Active neoplastic disease of the spine.
- Contraindication to spinal surgery.
- Inability to provide informed consent or complete study questionnaires.
- Symptoms attributable to spinal stenosis are not the predominant clinical complaint
- Foraminal stenosis grade ≥2 according to the Lee classification.
- Dynamic spondylolisthesis ≥3 mm on flexion-extension radiographs.
- Persons involuntarily detained by judicial or administrative order.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Decompression and fusion
|
Participants undergo microsurgical decompression of symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis combined with extension of the existing lumbar fusion.
|
|
Active Comparator: Intervention
Mircosurgical decompression only
|
Participants undergo microsurgical decompression of symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after previous lumbar fusion surgery without extension of the existing fusion.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Achieving at Least 30% Reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
|
The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants achieving a reduction of at least 30% in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) compared with baseline.
The ODI is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing disability related to lumbar spine disorders on a scale from 0% to 100%.
A reduction of at least 30% is considered clinically meaningful.
|
24 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain related disability
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Disability related to low back pain assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
The ODI score ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and worse functional impairment.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Leg Pain Intensity at Rest
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) for leg pain at rest.The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Leg Pain Intensity during Movement
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) for leg pain during movement.The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Back Pain Intensity at Rest
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) for back pain at rest.The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Back Pain Intensity during Movement
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) for back pain during movement.The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Maximum Walking Distance
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Maximum walking distance measured in meters.
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
generates eight domain scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), each transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life and functional status.
Unit of Measure: Points on a scale (0-100).
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).
The EQ-5D-5L evaluates five dimensions of health status (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with five response levels.
Responses are converted into a single EQ-5D-5L Index Score using an established country-specific value set.
Higher index scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Unit of Measure: Utility index score (higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life).
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Mood Assessed by the German General Depression Scale - Short Form (ADS-K)
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Depressive symptoms assessed using the German General Depression Scale - Short Form (ADS-K).
The ADS-K is a self-report questionnaire comprising 15 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3 points).
Total scores range from 0 to 45 points, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptomatology and worse mood status.
Unit of Measure: Points on a scale (range: 0-45; higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms)
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Sleep Quality Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
The PSQI is a self-administered questionnaire evaluating sleep quality and disturbances over the previous month across seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.
Component scores are summed to generate a global PSQI score ranging from 0 to 21 points, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality and greater sleep disturbance.
Unit of Measure: Points on a scale (range: 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality).
|
Baseline (before surgery), 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From date of surgery until hospital discharge, up to 30 days postoperatively
|
Length of hospital stay measured in days from surgery until hospital discharge.
|
From date of surgery until hospital discharge, up to 30 days postoperatively
|
|
Intensive Care Unit Stay
Time Frame: From admission to the intensive care unit after surgery until discharge from the intensive care unit, up to 30 days postoperatively.
|
Duration of intensive care unit stay measured in days.
|
From admission to the intensive care unit after surgery until discharge from the intensive care unit, up to 30 days postoperatively.
|
|
Additional or Revision Spine Surgery
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after surgery
|
Proportion of participants requiring additional spinal surgery or revision surgery during follow-up.
|
Up to 24 months after surgery
|
|
Perioperative Complications
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
Number and type of perioperative complications associated with the surgical procedure.
|
Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
|
Operative Parameters
Time Frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss
|
Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
|
Dynamic Spondylolisthesis
Time Frame: 24 month after surgery
|
Presence of dynamic spondylolisthesis defined as a translation of ≥3 mm on flexion-extension radiographs.Unit of Measure: Participants with dynamic spondylolisthesis.
|
24 month after surgery
|
|
Central Stenosis Severity Assessed by the Schizas Classification
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
|
Central canal stenosis at the adjacent segment assessed on MRI using the Schizas classification (Grades A-D).Unit of Measure: Grade (A-D; higher grades indicate more severe stenosis).
|
24 months after surgery
|
|
Foraminal Stenosis Severity Assessed by the Lee Classification
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery.
|
Foraminal stenosis at the adjacent segment assessed on MRI using the Lee classification (Grades 1-4).Unit of Measure: Grade (1-4; higher grades indicate more severe foraminal stenosis).
|
24 months after surgery.
|
|
Implant Integrity
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery.
|
Implant integrity assessed on radiographs, including evidence of implant loosening, breakage, or material dislocation.Unit of Measure: Participants with implant failure.
|
24 months after surgery.
|
|
Segmental Lordosis
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery.
|
Segmental lordosis measured on standing lateral radiographs.Unit of Measure: Degrees (°).
|
24 months after surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STASS-Trial
- 574896382 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study, after de-identification, will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator.
Supporting documents including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and data dictionary will also be made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study, as well as the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code, will be made available to qualified researchers.
Access will be granted to investigators who provide a scientifically sound research proposal that is approved by the study steering committee. Requests must be submitted to the study sponsor and should specify the intended use of the data.
Data will be shared only after publication of the primary study results and following execution of an appropriate data-sharing agreement. Access will be provided through a secure electronic data transfer system in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridHospital San Carlos, Madrid; FUNDACION PARA LA INVESTIGACION HOSPITAL CLINICO...RecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) | Lumbar Canal StenosisSpain
-
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic,...Medtronics, Inc.Not yet recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Spinal Instability | Degenerative Lumbar Spine DiseasesPoland
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
University of ValenciaHospital General Universitario de ValenciaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Neurogenic ClaudicationSpain
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNorth American Spine SocietyCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spinal InstabilityUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital BaselCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
-
Bursa City HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar SpondylosisChina
-
The First People's Hospital of LianyungangNot yet recruitingSpinal Stenosis Lumbar
Clinical Trials on Microsurgical Decompression with Extension of Fusion
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruiting
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
Greenwich HospitalYale UniversityCompletedCervical Spondylotic MyelopathyUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalMøre og Romsdal Hospital TrustActive, not recruitingLumbar Degenerative SpondylolisthesisNorway
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkWithdrawnPatients With Spinal Stenosis Indicated for LLIFUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity Hospital of North Norway; Sykehuset Innlandet HFNot yet recruitingChronic Low Back and Leg Pain | Lumbar Adjacent Spinal StenosisNorway
-
Lahey ClinicPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteActive, not recruitingCervical Spondylosis With MyelopathyUnited States, Canada
-
Southern Medical University, ChinaCompletedChiari Malformation | Basilar Invagination | Atlantoaxial DislocationChina
-
Paradigm SpineMCRACompleted