- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03088306
Improving Pain and Reducing Opioid Use (IPaRO) in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients (IPaRO)
Comparative Effectiveness of Multi-modal Pain Management Versus Standard Intra- and Post-operative Analgesia: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Reduce Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
- Drug: Standard analgesia use [Oxygen]
- Drug: Standard analgesia use [Hydromorphone]
- Drug: Standard analgesia use [Volatile Anesthesia]
- Drug: Standard analgesia use [Fentanyl]
- Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Acetaminophen + Gabapentin]
- Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Fentanyl]
- Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Intravenous Ketamine]
- Drug: Multi-modal pain management [Valium + Gabapentin]
Detailed Description
Patients presenting for lumbar spine surgery experience pain related to their spine condition. Following surgery, these patients also experience surgical pain resulting from disruption of skin, muscle tissue, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and facet joints. Proper pain management is necessary to reduce pain-related and medication side effects and to promote rehabilitation. This pain is often treated with opioid medications - with roughly 40% of patient experiencing sub-optimal pain management. Adequate pain control has become a top priority among professional societies, healthcare systems, and accrediting agencies.
Multi-modal pain management strategies have been proposed to (1) control pre-operative pain related to spine pathology; (2) employ non-opioid medication peri-operatively to pre-empt post-operative surgical pain; and (3) monitor and control pain intensity before and after surgery. There is a demonstrated lack of evidence regarding optimal post-operative protocols and pathways. The investigators have planned a randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two methods of peri-operative pain management to reduce post-operative pain and opioid use among patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Prior to submission to National Institutes of Health (NIH), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), or Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), it is necessary to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the trial protocol. The current proposal will provide this critical evidence of feasibility and acceptability of a multi-modal pain management plan for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, this study will provide critical preliminary data to compare the effectiveness of protocol-driven multi-modal pain management to control post-operative pain, reduce opioid medication use, and improve physical activity, sleep, and health.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible participants will be English-speaking adults who are presenting to a spine surgeon (orthopaedic or neurosurgeon) for surgical treatment of a lumbar degenerative condition (spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and degenerative spondylolisthesis) using laminectomy with or without arthrodesis (i.e. fusion).
Exclusion Criteria:
- A microsurgical technique as the primary procedure, such as an isolated laminotomy or microdiscectomy.
- Spinal deformity as the primary indication for surgery.
- Spine surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis, trauma, infection, or tumor.
- Back and/or lower extremity pain < 3 months indicating no history of sub-acute or chronic pain.
- History of neurological disorder or disease, resulting in moderate to severe movement dysfunction.
- Presence of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
- Patient refusal to participate.
- Known allergic reactions to any of the study medications
- Surgery under a workman's compensation claim.
- Not able to return to clinic for standard follow-up visits with surgeon.
- Unable to provide a stable address and access to a telephone.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard analgesia use
A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use.
|
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia.
In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia.
In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia.
In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia.
In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
|
Active Comparator: Multi-modal pain management
A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use that is designed to reduce the need for post-operative opioid medication.
|
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up
Time Frame: 52 week
|
Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up
|
52 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump use
Time Frame: during surgical hospitalization, up to 12 weeks
|
Total morphine equivalent of opioids administered by the PCA pump
|
during surgical hospitalization, up to 12 weeks
|
Opioid medication use
Time Frame: up to 90 days
|
How many patients were prescribed and using opioid medication over the 90 days after hospital discharge?
|
up to 90 days
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of pain intensity; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Physical Function
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of physical function; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Fatigue
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of fatigue; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Anxiety
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of anxiety; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Depression
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of depression; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of sleep disturbance; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of satisfaction with social roles; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Health status (Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12, version 2)
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of physical and mental health; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Measure of pain-related disability; Range 0% - 100%; Scores greater than 30% indicative of moderate pain-related disability
|
at 6 and 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard L Skolasky, ScD, Johns Hopkins University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Spinal Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Spinal Stenosis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Dissociative
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Antipyretics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Anticonvulsants
- Antimanic Agents
- Ketamine
- Fentanyl
- Gabapentin
- Acetaminophen
- Hydromorphone
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00113816
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital BaselCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
-
Bursa City HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar SpondylosisChina
-
Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandMaastricht University; Schulthess KlinikRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Spinal Disease | Lumbar InstabilitySwitzerland
-
University of Roma La SapienzaRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityItaly
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenProf. Dr. Astrid Weyerbrock, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kantonsspital St.... and other collaboratorsCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine DegenerationSwitzerland
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedDisk Herniated Lumbar | Spinal Stenosis LumbarKorea, Republic of
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Instability
Clinical Trials on Standard analgesia use [Oxygen]
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedMaternal Oxygen Use in LaborUnited States
-
Saint Thomas Hospital, PanamaCompletedSurgical Wound InfectionPanama
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne...Completed
-
Yunus EmreNot yet recruitingBiliary Obstruction | Biliary Stones | Oddi's Sphincter Constriction
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterWellcomeRecruitingAcute HypoxemiaKenya, Malawi, Rwanda
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansCompletedAcute Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia | Oxygen Inhalation Therapy | Prehospital SettingFrance
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknown
-
University Hospital, GasthuisbergCompleted
-
François LelloucheOttawa Hospital Research Institute; The Ottawa HospitalUnknownTrauma | COPD Exacerbation