Improving Pain and Reducing Opioid Use (IPaRO) in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients (IPaRO)

October 15, 2018 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Comparative Effectiveness of Multi-modal Pain Management Versus Standard Intra- and Post-operative Analgesia: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Reduce Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

Patients presenting for lumbar spine surgery experience pain related to their spine condition. Following surgery, these patients also experience surgical pain resulting from disruption of skin, muscle tissue, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and facet joints. This pain is often treated with opioid medications - with roughly 40% of patient experiencing sub-optimal pain management. Adequate pain control has become a top priority among professional societies, healthcare systems, and accrediting agencies. The current proposal will provide this critical evidence of feasibility and acceptability of a multi-modal pain management plan for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, this study will provide critical preliminary data to compare the effectiveness of protocol-driven multi-modal pain management to control post-operative pain, reduce opioid medication use, and improve physical activity, sleep, and health.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients presenting for lumbar spine surgery experience pain related to their spine condition. Following surgery, these patients also experience surgical pain resulting from disruption of skin, muscle tissue, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and facet joints. Proper pain management is necessary to reduce pain-related and medication side effects and to promote rehabilitation. This pain is often treated with opioid medications - with roughly 40% of patient experiencing sub-optimal pain management. Adequate pain control has become a top priority among professional societies, healthcare systems, and accrediting agencies.

Multi-modal pain management strategies have been proposed to (1) control pre-operative pain related to spine pathology; (2) employ non-opioid medication peri-operatively to pre-empt post-operative surgical pain; and (3) monitor and control pain intensity before and after surgery. There is a demonstrated lack of evidence regarding optimal post-operative protocols and pathways. The investigators have planned a randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two methods of peri-operative pain management to reduce post-operative pain and opioid use among patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Prior to submission to National Institutes of Health (NIH), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), or Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), it is necessary to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the trial protocol. The current proposal will provide this critical evidence of feasibility and acceptability of a multi-modal pain management plan for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Additionally, this study will provide critical preliminary data to compare the effectiveness of protocol-driven multi-modal pain management to control post-operative pain, reduce opioid medication use, and improve physical activity, sleep, and health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible participants will be English-speaking adults who are presenting to a spine surgeon (orthopaedic or neurosurgeon) for surgical treatment of a lumbar degenerative condition (spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and degenerative spondylolisthesis) using laminectomy with or without arthrodesis (i.e. fusion).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A microsurgical technique as the primary procedure, such as an isolated laminotomy or microdiscectomy.
  • Spinal deformity as the primary indication for surgery.
  • Spine surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis, trauma, infection, or tumor.
  • Back and/or lower extremity pain < 3 months indicating no history of sub-acute or chronic pain.
  • History of neurological disorder or disease, resulting in moderate to severe movement dysfunction.
  • Presence of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
  • Patient refusal to participate.
  • Known allergic reactions to any of the study medications
  • Surgery under a workman's compensation claim.
  • Not able to return to clinic for standard follow-up visits with surgeon.
  • Unable to provide a stable address and access to a telephone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard analgesia use
A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
A protocol directed and clinically appropriate post-operative analgesia. In this study, standard post-operative analgesia is defined as: oxygen, volatile anesthesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone.
Active Comparator: Multi-modal pain management
A strategy to manage pain in the peri-operative period that is in common clinical use that is designed to reduce the need for post-operative opioid medication.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.
Administration of acetaminophen (1 gm po) plus gabapentin (600-1200 mg po) in the preparation area prior to surgery; pre-induction opioid titration with fentanyl until pain is relieved and/or respiratory depression ensues; intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg load prior to incision then 10 mcg/kg/min) during surgery; acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin during hospitalization; and prescription for acetaminophen, valium plus gabapentin at discharge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up
Time Frame: 52 week
Number of participants undergoing lumbar spine surgery with complete follow-up
52 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump use
Time Frame: during surgical hospitalization, up to 12 weeks
Total morphine equivalent of opioids administered by the PCA pump
during surgical hospitalization, up to 12 weeks
Opioid medication use
Time Frame: up to 90 days
How many patients were prescribed and using opioid medication over the 90 days after hospital discharge?
up to 90 days
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of pain intensity; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Physical Function
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of physical function; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Fatigue
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of fatigue; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Anxiety
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of anxiety; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Depression
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of depression; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of sleep disturbance; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of satisfaction with social roles; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
Health status (Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12, version 2)
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of physical and mental health; Range 0 - 100; Population mean 50, standard deviation 10
at 6 and 12 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 weeks
Measure of pain-related disability; Range 0% - 100%; Scores greater than 30% indicative of moderate pain-related disability
at 6 and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard L Skolasky, ScD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Standard analgesia use [Oxygen]

3
Subscribe