- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04708977
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT (IDVD)
Is Indirect Decompression Sufficient for the Treatment of Central Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Fusion indicated by the treating surgeon. Fusion may be indicated for one or more of the following reasons:
- Mobile degenerative spondylolisthesis
- Severe vertical foraminal stenosis
- Adjacent segment degeneration and/or degenerative disc disease with suspected discogenic pain
One-level central canal stenosis
- WITH neurogenic claudication
- As measured in preoperative MRI
- Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score > 35% (18/50)
- Failed 3 months of conservative treatment
- Willing to give written informed consent and psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to comply fully with protocol, including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements, and filling out forms
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multilevel central canal stenosis
- Patients with vertebral endplate dimensions that are too small to allow for safe placement of an intervertebral cage
- Known allergy to titanium, polyethylene, cobalt, chromium, or molybdenum
- Prior surgery at index disc level (discectomy, decompression, or fusion)
- History of spinal or vertebral infection of the lumbar spine
- History of vertebral fracture of the lumbar spine
- Current pregnancy or interest in becoming pregnant over the next 1 year
- Active infection-systemic or local
- Non-English speakers
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 1: Indirect Decompression
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), with indirect decompression
|
One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion, with or without percutaneous posterior instrumentation.
Thorough discectomy will be performed using lateral access.
Fusion will then be performed using lateral access interbody cage and allograft bone graft with or without use of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 2.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 2: Direct Decompression
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), with direct decompression
|
One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion, with or without percutaneous posterior instrumentation. Thorough discectomy will be performed using lateral access instruments. Fusion will then be performed using lateral access interbody cage and allograft bone graft with or without use of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 2. Additionally, direct decompression through midline or parasagittal approach will be utilized. A unilateral laminotomy or complete bilateral laminectomy may be performed. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post-operatively
|
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 100 point scale. The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools [1]. For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated by adding all scores for each statement, divided by 50 total possible points, and then multiplied by 100 for a percentage. Percentage scores are interpreted on a scale from 0-20% as minimal disability to 61-100% as crippled. |
Up to 12 months post-operatively
|
Comparison of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-operatively. (6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months timepoints)
|
Compare ODI scores to assess the kinetics of improvement in the control (direct decompression) vs. treatment (indirect decompression) groups. The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools [1]. For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated by adding all scores for each statement, divided by 50 total possible points, and then multiplied by 100 for a percentage. Percentage scores are interpreted on a scale from 0-20% as minimal disability to 61-100% as crippled. |
Up to 24 months post-operatively. (6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months timepoints)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reoperation Rate
Time Frame: Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively.
|
Reoperation rate on the lumbar spine within 12 months and within 24 months
|
Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively.
|
Complication Rate
Time Frame: Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively.
|
Complication rate within 12 months and within 24 months
|
Within 12 months and 24 months, post-operatively.
|
Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)-Back and Leg pain
Time Frame: 6- Weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-Months.
|
Patient Reported Outcomes: Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)-back and leg pain scores
|
6- Weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-Months.
|
Radiographic Measurements - Lumbar Lordosis
Time Frame: Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in lumbar lordosis as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).
Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators.
|
Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Radiographic Measurements - Segmental Lordosis
Time Frame: Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in segmental lordosis as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).
Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators.
|
Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Radiographic Measurements - Disc Space Height
Time Frame: Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Radiographic measurements at 12 months will be compared to preoperative measurements to quantify the change in disc space height as a result of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).
Measurements will be taken in millimeters by (2) co-investigators.
|
Preoperative and 12-Month radiographs
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sravisht Iyer, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
- Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
- Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, Dargie H. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1208-17. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1208.
- Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
- Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B, Kimura H, Takemoto M, Matsuda S. Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E175-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703.
- Isaacs RE, Sembrano JN, Tohmeh AG; SOLAS Degenerative Study Group. Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S133-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001472.
- Kono Y, Gen H, Sakuma Y, Koshika Y. Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):356-364. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.356. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
- Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Satake K, Ishikawa Y, Ouchida J, Segi N, Yamaguchi H, Imagama S. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1411-E1418. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003180.
- Pimenta L. Less-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) surgical technique: video lecture. Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:441-2. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3948-4. No abstract available.
- Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012.
- Smith ZA, Sugimoto K, Lawton CD, Fessler RG. Incidence of lumbar spine pedicle breach after percutaneous screw fixation: a radiographic evaluation of 601 screws in 151 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):358-63. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826226cb.
- Baird EO, McAnany SJ, Overley S, Skovrlj B, Guzman JZ, Qureshi SA. Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Does Training Level Matter? Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E748-E753. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000274.
- Sellin JN, Mayer RR, Hoffman M, Ropper AE. Simultaneous lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screws (SLIPS) with CT-guided navigation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;175:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
- Houten JK, Nasser R, Baxi N. Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using theO-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system. Neurosurgery. 2012 Apr;70(4):990-5. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318237a829.
- Jain D, Manning J, Lord E, Protopsaltis T, Kim Y, Buckland AJ, Bendo J, Fischer C, Goldstein J. Initial Single-Institution Experience With a Novel Robotic-Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw and Pelvic Screw Placement With 643 Screws. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Oct 31;13(5):459-463. doi: 10.14444/6060. eCollection 2019 Oct.
- Huntsman KT, Riggleman JR, Ahrendtsen LA, Ledonio CG. Navigated robot-guided pedicle screws placed successfully in single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):643-647. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01034-w. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
- Boukebir MA, Berlin CD, Navarro-Ramirez R, Heiland T, Scholler K, Rawanduzy C, Kirnaz S, Jada A, Hartl R. Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Spine Lumbar Decompression and Dural Repair Through Tubular Retractors. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Apr 1;13(2):232-245. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001407.
- Sembrano JN, Tohmeh A, Isaacs R; SOLAS Degenerative Study Group. Two-year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part I: Clinical Findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S123-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001471.
- Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2027-2036. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-2228
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patients With Spinal Stenosis Indicated for LLIF
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRecruitingPatients With Spinal Stenosis Indicated for MIS TLIFUnited States
-
Biotronik, Inc.CompletedPatients Indicated for an ICDUnited States
-
Capso Vision, Inc.UnknownPatients Indicated for Periampullary or Pancreaticobiliary ExaminationUnited States
-
Angiodynamics, Inc.TerminatedPatients Indicated for a PICC for Any Medical ConditionSwitzerland, United States, Canada
-
Faculty Hospital Kralovske VinohradyCompletedPatients With an Aneurysm of Native Vascular Access Indicated for Surgical TreatmentCzechia
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...CompletedPatients With Indication for Flexible BronchoscopyIndia
-
St. Boniface HospitalCompletedPatients Waiting for Elective Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) | Patients Waiting for Aortic Valve Repair/Replacement for Moderate Aortic Stenosis or Severe Regurgitation | Patients Waiting for Mitral Valve Repair/Replacement for Moderate Stenosis or Severe Regurgitation and other conditionsCanada
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityUnknownPatients With Urosepis and Received Ertapenem for TreatmentThailand
-
B. Braun Melsungen AGCompletedParenteral Nutrition for Patients With Proven Insufficient Enteral ResorptionChina
-
Yungjin Pharm. Co., Ltd.CompletedNeurologic Claudication in Patients With Lumbar Spinal StenosisKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on One-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion with Indirect Decompression
-
OrganogenesisActive, not recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylosis | SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
ExactechTerminatedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylolisthesis | StenosisUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...CompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine DegenerationChina
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical... and other collaboratorsUnknownDegenerative Scoliosis | Spinal Deformity | Minimally InvasiveChina
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingAdjacent Segment DegenerationChina
-
Mesoblast, Ltd.CompletedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University...CompletedDrain Tube Influence the Postoperative Epidural HaematomaChina
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingFusion of Spine | Sympathetic Nervous SystemKorea, Republic of
-
Pei-Yuan Lee, MDAeon Biotechnology CorporationUnknownSpinal Fusion | Bone MarrowTaiwan
-
Invibio LtdMedical Metrics Diagnostics, Inc; Keos LLC; Technomics Research; Viedoc TechnologiesRecruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylolisthesis | RetrolisthesisUnited States